[AMGcpa]

I’m using NINJA MCQ’s right now to study BEC and these problems are way to difficult (the computational ones). My becker expired so I tried NINJA for the first time on audit, and LOVED those MCQ’s because they were shorter and I think more realistic.

I’m thinking of going back to Becker for BEC MCQ’s because NINJA is so brutal.

What do you guys think!!?

[monikernc]

i used ninja mcqs and passed. BEC is just a hot mess. mile wide; inch deep. i prep'd longer and scored lower for BEC than the other exams. it is just a lot of different topics with no deep dive into any of them. working the ninja mcqs will help you nail the entire concept in each question. the mcqs are 85% of exam score so you have to know everything going in.
youtube helped too. roger's variances videos and miles capital budgeting video were essential time savers for those topics. i also read some COSO Guidance docs. i did very little prep for WCs. used the suggestions folks posted here for those.
i did so many mcqs and took stacks of notes. remember to ask for a handheld calculator for the exam. do the aicpa released questions, too.

FAR 7/25/15 76!
AUD 10/30/15 93
BEC 2/27/16 82
REG 5/23/16 88!
Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
if you want things to change, you have to do something different

[Steve Brule]

Becker's computational questions are much longer than ninja's. Ninja's are definitely difficult, but I don't think Becker's questions are any less brutal.

FAR - 86
AUD - 99
REG - 88
BEC - 08/29/2016

For your health!

[AMGcpa]

Thanks for the replies! Yeah BEC sucks. Just don't like wasting time with these long computational problems when I could be doing 2-5 other problems during that time.

[Author]

Replies