[Excel14]

CPAexcel or Gleim? I have the package with CPAexcel, that grants access to the Wiley bank as well (approx 8,000 MCQ for all sections). Not sure how many MCQs Gleim has for all 4 parts.

I’ve heard that unrelated to MCQs, Gleim has better practice SIMs.

Thoughts?

BEC (2/28/16) ----- 78
FAR (09/10/16)-----
AUD
REG

CIA, CGAP, CFE

[jeff]

Lots of posts here: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/ninja-mcq-trending-vs-actual-scores/

Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

[Excel14]

NM

BEC (2/28/16) ----- 78
FAR (09/10/16)-----
AUD
REG

CIA, CGAP, CFE

[HAK326]

I feel like Ninja MCQ is the best that is out there. Ninja not only explains why each answer choice is right or wrong, but also provides resources for each topic referenced within a question. I have Becker (thanks to a contract with my employer that I now regret) and I gain very little from working their MCQs. After I answer a question, I get a “correct” and then a long explanation as to why I chose the right answer and then something along the lines of “choices B-D are incorrect because A is correct.” It is so frustrating and you are missing a huge learning opportunity by not getting an explanation for each answer choice. I've actually convinced my coworkers to use Ninja instead of Becker. That is not easy to do when people have been brainwashed into thinking Becker is the best that is out there, but so far my coworkers love Ninja and have thanked me for introducing it to them.

[Anonymous]

Between Wiley and Gleim, I think Gleim has a better test bank. It's SIMS emulate the format you will see on test day. I like how their adapt technology points out what areas we need to work on. Did you take a test run of Gleim already? If not, you can go to their website and get a free trial

[Author]

Replies