- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 1 month ago by .
-
Topic
-
Does anyone else get confused by the way the test questions get phrased?
Sometimes I will take a small, highly manageable section of Becker, like maybe four pages, and I will go through it with a fine tooth comb. When I am done, I will be able to explain what Becker wrote, and so I feel confident in going to the MCQs. Then I’ll go to the related MCQ’s, and sometimes – not always, but definitely sometimes – the questions (or parts of them) sound like they are written in a different language. The result is, it’s sometimes hard to apply what I learned from the lecture.
One Becker Prof told me this difference is a deliberate effort on behalf of the instructional designers, but I tend to think Becker’s explanations can also be very clear, so I’m not exactly sure what is causing the problem. If it isn’t the lecture, then maybe the question is ill-stated? I guess I could just focus on the MCQs, but I do like to listen to the lectures (just because I really do enjoy reading and learning and listening to lectures).
Anyway, I was just wondering if anyone else out there sees this difference? And, if so, any advice on what to do about it? How to make the transition from the lecture (which should contain the answers to the questions) to the questions (which should be answered by the lectures (as well as in the MCQ explanations)).
Grrr… I love to learn, but I love stuff that makes sense even more… 🙂
- The topic ‘The Phraseology of Test Questions’ is closed to new replies.
