[jeff]

What is your preference?

-Old way – 30 per (scan more topics before having to click to page 2)

-New way – 15 per (easier for mobile loading)

-Agnostic

[Anonymous]

Ditto to KasiaS !!!

[jeff]

I moved it back to 30…I don't run CPM ads (pay per impressions) on here anyway…so page views wasn't a factor. I found that I scroll like a mofo with my iPhone when it's 30, but I also like seeing more topics.

[Anonymous]

Thanks…I like it better this way…maybe it's just because I'm used to it…

[Minimorty]

Ditto to scrolling like a mofo. Lol.

[jeff]

Cool .. That's why I asked! As always … appreciate everyone's contributions.

Jeff

[Anonymous]

I didn't see why not to have 15 per page…and it made sense to make things easier for those with mobile devices…but once you changed it to 15 it did seem a little weird to have so few threads/posts per page…

[jeff]

15 it is…if I get death threats, I'll change it back 🙂 much easier to read on mobile.

[Anonymous]

Whoa!? Back to 15?

[Minimorty]

Jeff – are the # of topics on the front page and the number of posts in a topic linked or can you have 30 topics on front page and each topic has 15 posts per page? I hadn't even noticed until now that there are only 15 unstickied topics. I kinda think this is no bueno ( even though I love the 15 posts per page).

[Anonymous]

Yeah, I second Mimorty's suggestion. I liked more threads available on the front page…I don't really care if 15 or 30 posts show up on the pages of each of the threads' posts.

[jeff]

I just made it 10. Muh hahahahahahahaaaaa

Ahem.

They are linked…same non sticky on front = topic posts

[jeff]

Back to 30 … I like that better anyway 🙂 I will quit jacking with it.

[Anonymous]

🙂 Yes! We're back to 30! I even counted to make sure 🙂

Wish it would work out better for those using phones, though…oh well.

[Author]

Replies