The article definitely did not get into any specifics. The article begins with a blanket statement that they have seen no difference in quality among employees with degrees and without, but they do not furnish proof in the article, perhaps EY did have actual data to support this.
I think that this is a ploy of sorts, in all honesty. There are tons of people commenting high accolades and praises for EY who have NO clue about public accounting. They just like the sentiment that people should not be vetted based mostly on a college degree, which I agree with. However, in public accounting, not having the basic means of earning a CPA license (in audit/tax/ and in some cases consulting) will hugely stifle the earning potential of the employee. I do not believe without the CPA that an individual can progress beyond senior (right?). They can always go to private, but is an industry employer going to be as welcoming of someone without a college degree and probably only 3 years of experience?
Then my last question … is it more advantageous to leave college off of your resume at EY then to include a college that is not recruited from or has a mediocre reputation? College discrimination does occur in these institutions (which is fine), does this make a loophole of sorts?
I just do not see this being practiced in real life …