CPA Excel Authoritative Literature is Horrible!

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183756
    Study Monk
    Member

    I am a Becker user who is using CPA Excel to get units for my educational requirements. I am not totally ready to bash CPA Excel, but their Authoritative literature problems are useless. They have no advanced search function. Correct me if I am wrong, but the only way people should be searching for answers on the actual exam is through the advanced search function. Becker has an advanced search function in their Authoritative problems so I know it can be done. That’s one point for Becker.

    I spoke to an ancient wise man who sent me on a mushroom induced journey through an ancient forest to find the key to passing the CPA exam. A talking spider monkey told me to throw the last of my drinking water in the dirt to find what I was looking for. So I followed his instructions and the following message appeared in the soil:

    "Do 5000 multiple choice questions for each section"

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #516088
    jaclynnh
    Member

    Agree, I noticed this as well after switching from Becker to CPAexcel. I did appreciate Becker's AL much more. However, I do prefer CPAexcel overall, I finally was able to put the highlighter down, and actually learn the topics!

    CPAexcel CPA Review

    REG - 77*, 74, 70, 71, 82
    AUD - 71, 68, 71, 83
    BEC - 75
    FAR - 65, 70, 72, 75

    * = Lost credit due to the 18 month rule

    #516126
    jaclynnh
    Member

    Agree, I noticed this as well after switching from Becker to CPAexcel. I did appreciate Becker's AL much more. However, I do prefer CPAexcel overall, I finally was able to put the highlighter down, and actually learn the topics!

    CPAexcel CPA Review

    REG - 77*, 74, 70, 71, 82
    AUD - 71, 68, 71, 83
    BEC - 75
    FAR - 65, 70, 72, 75

    * = Lost credit due to the 18 month rule

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘CPA Excel Authoritative Literature is Horrible!’ is closed to new replies.