- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 6 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Hi all, I came across a question in my Wiley Audit TB that has left me a little stumped. It is as follows:
Which of the following is correct concerning a CPA firm’s preparation of financial statements engagement?
A. The statements should only be used by management and not third parties.
B. A written engagement letter or oral agreement is required.
C. No accountant’s report ordinarily accompanies the financial statements.
D. At a minimum, the accountant preparing the financial statements must comply with the compilation standards.
The correct answer is C. My confusion is regarding the difference between a compilation and financial statement preparation. My understanding is that a compilation is essentially the act of taking the clients accounting data and producing a set of financial statements. So how does this differ from a preparation? Is a preparation of financial statements not essentially the same thing?, i.e. creating financial statements out of accounting data?
The reference in the professional literature is SSARS No. 21. My interpretation after reading the literature is that the difference between a compilation and financial statement preparation is that with a financial statement preparation, the client and the CPA work together in producing the financial statements, whereas, with a compilation, the financial statements are prepared and issued solely by the CPA.
According to the literature, a compilation requires the issuance of a compilation report (as I’m sure most are aware), while a financial statement preparation does not.
Can anyone help in clarifying the differences between these two services, i.e. how to differentiate between the two? Thanks.
- The topic ‘AUDIT: Compilation vs. Financial Statement Preperation’ is closed to new replies.