Any of you upset with the abuse of non-GAAP accounting

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #198213
    win2bet
    Participant

    Anytime you see a financial headline or read a story, its always the non-gaap EPS being shown in the headlines & by the media. We do all of this studying of the proper way of presenting a company’s true financial position & its all thrown out the window.Companies are excluding e a ton of recurring, ordinary, vital operational pieces from their EPS. Some have a gain on non-GAAP and a huge loss on their GAAP.

    Here is an example a company used on their quarterly report

    ” Non-GAAP Information

    To supplement the financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the company uses non- GAAP financial measures that exclude certain items, such as amortization of inventory step-up, amortization of alliance product assets & property, plant and equipment step up, stock-based compensation step-up, contingent consideration fair value adjustments, restructuring, integration, acquisition-related and other costs, In-process research and development, impairments and other charges, (“IPR&D”), legal settlements outside the ordinary course of business, the impact of currency fluctuations, amortization including intangible asset impairments and other non-cash charges, amortization and write-down of deferred financing costs, debt discounts and ASC 470-20 (FSP APB 14-1) interest, loss on extinguishment of debt, (gain) loss on assets sold/held for sale/impairment, net, (gain) loss on investments, net, and adjusts tax expense to cash taxes. Management uses non-GAAP financial measures internally for strategic decision making, forecasting future results and evaluating current performance. By disclosing non-GAAP financial measures, management intends to provide investors with a meaningful, consistent comparison of the company’s core operating results and trends for the periods presented. Non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP. Therefore, the information is not necessarily comparable to other companies and should be considered as a supplement to, not a substitute for, or superior to, the corresponding measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.”

    REG 68,87
    BEC 85
    FAR 75
    AUD 64,64, 86!

  • The topic ‘Any of you upset with the abuse of non-GAAP accounting’ is closed to new replies.