Related parties (NINJA notes)

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #176638
    LSNYC
    Member

    How are in laws not related parties? If I sell something to my in laws and file a joint return how are they not a related party? Page 62 of NINJA notes.

    Thanks!

    A - 61, 91!!
    B - 78!
    F - 76!!!
    R - 71, 73, 74, 69, 77!!!!

    Finally done!

    This is my 2nd attempt at the exam, I had two parts passed (failed many) and I stupidly quit, big mistake. Now I'm back and with a vengeance!

Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #404495

    LSNYC, yeah, going over issues related to in-laws and this that's what i've got on them so far:

    Depending on issue, in-laws can be close relatives as in qualifying relative for a dependency exemption if criteria met

    and can be as if “total strangers” for purposes of related-party transactions.

    bwt, I though that one does not file joint return with the inlaws, but rather, claim person/both of them for dependency exemption?!

    Becker Class of Jan - Aug 2013: FARB DONE!!!!
    CPA license pending 🙂

    #404496
    LSNYC
    Member

    Thanks Seattle

    I guess what I don't understand is my parent is a related party right? Then how if I file a joint return with my husband are his parents my inlaws not a related party. I am only taking about sales to related parties here if you have NINJA notes look at pages 61-62.

    Thanks!

    A - 61, 91!!
    B - 78!
    F - 76!!!
    R - 71, 73, 74, 69, 77!!!!

    Finally done!

    This is my 2nd attempt at the exam, I had two parts passed (failed many) and I stupidly quit, big mistake. Now I'm back and with a vengeance!

    #404497
    red3biggs
    Member

    My take, and maybe I am wrong.

    Your in-laws do not become a permanent related party.

    So long as you are married and your spouse is living, they are a related party through your wife.

    But, if you divorce or your spouse passes, they would no longer be considered related parties.

    AUD: 8/17/2012
    REG: 4/29/2013
    BEC: 7/8/2013
    FAR: 1/16/2014

    #404498
    jeff
    Keymaster

    In-laws are not related parties.

    From IRS:

    Losses on sales or trades of property. You cannot deduct a loss on the sale or trade of property, other than a distribution in complete liquidation of a corporation, if the transaction is directly or indirectly between you and the following related parties.

    Members of your family. This includes only your brothers and sisters, half-brothers and half-sisters, spouse, ancestors (parents, grandparents, etc.), and lineal descendants (children, grandchildren, etc.).

    #404499
    LSNYC
    Member

    Jeff – here is my confusion, If you file a joint return with your spouse and sold property to one of your parents, for tax purposes this is a related party to only one of you how is that possible? Maybe I am over thinking this….

    A - 61, 91!!
    B - 78!
    F - 76!!!
    R - 71, 73, 74, 69, 77!!!!

    Finally done!

    This is my 2nd attempt at the exam, I had two parts passed (failed many) and I stupidly quit, big mistake. Now I'm back and with a vengeance!

    #404500
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Well – this would be where it was a business-type transaction because you're deducting a loss.

    For purposes of the exam, just run with it 🙂

Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • The topic ‘Related parties (NINJA notes)’ is closed to new replies.