REG Study Group Q4 2016 - Page 81

  • This topic has 2,222 replies, 130 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by hasy.
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #836140
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q4 2016 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    If this is your first post in the study group – please post your target exam date (just the time frame to preserve your anonymity), and your past history with this exam (optional, of course).

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 2,222 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #855970
    waitspring
    Participant

    Hi, I just saw the message ” Please complete your signature!!”

    Can anyone tell me where can I find and update my signature? Thanks again!

    #855973
    jonm857
    Participant

    Fckin brutal man.

    The first testlet was for the most part straightforward. The next two were absolutely INSANE. My Sims were not too crazy but I had spent so much time on MCQs that I only had 5 minutes to work with for 2 of them. Thats going to kill my chance of passing… I just know it. Dont feel 100% about the other sims either but i know I got some things right here and there. Ugh

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #855976
    Reg_Slayer
    Participant

    @jon
    hey if anything maybe you got the “harder” 2nd and 3rd testlets, which is actually a good thing.

    @wait
    just click the link

    UNRELATED:

    The adjusted basis of the property to the c-corp is the greater of:
    -s/h's basis in the property + the gain recognized
    -Liab assumed by c-corp

    #1025023
    jpowell31
    Participant

    @jon third testlet harder means you nailed the second testlet, which was also harder so you have a good shot!

    i have no idea how to feel about mine either. there was nothing crazy but so much lot of “wait but this could be X or Y if i could just explain why!” i'm confident i got the research and think and one other sim completely. I definitely got one wrong…the other 3 are up in the air. i used so much time to no avail using the AL so my fingers are crossed.

    this is going to sound ridiculous but i actually took 5 minutes in the exam calculating how much points i could lose on the SIMs and pass given a few different variables. didn't boost my confidence lol shocker

    #1143397
    jonm857
    Participant

    In my opinion there just isnt enough variation in beckers mcqs/sims to prep you for REG. They got me through AUD and BEC, but REG is just another animal by itself. You need to be equipped with absolutely fool-proof basis formulas so that if any variation gets thrown at you, then all you have to do is trust the formula. I dont trust these formulas anymore. There's about 20 pages in the text on bankruptcy alone, but the payoff for studying that is practically nonexistent. Now of course some people can vouch for becker in regards to REG, but it just isnt working for me. If i dont get it this time im switching to something else.

    On to FAR dammit.

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #1220812
    jonm857
    Participant

    Further, I wish everybody the best of luck in prepping for REG. I think it is the hardest out of the 4 without a doubt. Now that I have made it out of New Orleans' psychotic traffic, I can chill out. Thank you for listening to my rant.

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #1246420
    Reg_Slayer
    Participant

    @jon

    study temporary tax differences vs permanent tax differences first!
    also i think the DRD is on both exams.

    unrelated:
    Vacation pay earned by employees is deductible from income on the corporate 1120.

    #1253179
    Spartans92
    Participant

    @Reg_slayer, Im using Becker and I don't think I have seen any AMT for individual or corps on the SIMS. Does Ninja have them? How do I specifically focus on those? Like can I pick out the topics on the SIMS like the progress test? I have not done any ninja SIMS before. Thanks

    BEC- PASS

    #1253184
    Spartans92
    Participant

    @jonm, I agree becker doesn't really do well with REG imo. They only had 11 Questions on Individual AMT and a few on corporate and a SIM may show up! Like seriously. Dang Reg_slayer, those temp and perm differences suck! They got me on my first go I def need to improve them this round.

    BEC- PASS

    #1253257
    Reg_Slayer
    Participant

    we have to fight back.

    #1262455
    sonja90
    Participant

    @jon don't be so hard on yourself, I think you have passed.
    I got similar experience with my teslets
    T1-medium-marked 1
    T2-marked 9
    T3-marked 8
    Sims I know i got research and other 3 right, one i probably did not cuz i run out of time half way through. And one, the way they set it up was very weird it took me 5 minutest to figure out how to set my answers although i knew what they should be, I did not know how to set it in the “table” they gave it to me, that one pissed me off and i spent more time on it than what i should have.

    #1262646
    A1lessio
    Participant

    you guys definitely passed! I'm pretty sure you're suppose to feel defeated after the exam. When I walked out of audit I marked 10-11 per testlet, and had Far type sims I had no idea how to answer. I got an 86!

    @jonm – did you take the Becker practice exam?

    Also, my exam is on the 24th and I feel pretty screwed. My busy season ends hopefully by Friday and then I have a solid 8 days of nonstop cramming. I went through all the chapters. My plan is to do nonstop mcqs, re-read notes, re-study blaw chapters and just kind of lock everything down.

    AUD (08/02/2016)

    #1262952
    A1lessio
    Participant

    @Reg-Slayer: I think sims are great because they really drill into a specific topic and you can write it out and really study the specific topic. The only downside is that they are so time consuming, especially if you are studying them after you complete them.

    AUD (08/02/2016)

    #1262982
    aatoural
    Participant

    For the current year, Maple Corp.'s book income, before federal income tax, was $100,000. Included in this $100,000 were the following:
    Provision for state income tax $ 1,000
    Interest earned on U.S. Treasury Bonds 6,000
    Interest expense on bank loan to purchase U.S. Treasury Bonds 2,000
    Maple's taxable income for the current year was:
    a.$97,000
    b.$100,000
    c.$101,000
    d.$96,000

    Explanation
    Choice “b” is correct. Maple's taxable income for the year was $100,000.
    No adjustments from book income are required:
    State income taxes are a deductible corporate expense.
    Interest earned on U.S. treasury bonds are taxable.
    Interest expense on bank loans to purchase U.S. treasury bonds are deductible since the interest income earned on U.S. treasury bonds is taxable.

    My problem with this question was the wording. I did know that state income taxes and interest expense were deductible, whereas interest earned on treasury bonds were taxable. But my logic was that book income was $100,000 and that included all three items, thus for taxable income I needed to dedcut the $3,000 of allowable dedutions for this case.

    Where is it that I am misinterpreting the question?

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1262988
    Spartans92
    Participant

    @aa, I remember that question and I totally understand what you said as well. I did it for the second time without looking at the answer and I too came up with 3k deductible which I thought is subtracted from book. Since the interest is taxable and already included no adjustments are needed. This is one of my weak areas all these reconciliation between book and tax.

    BEC- PASS

Viewing 15 replies - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 2,222 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2016 - Page 81’ is closed to new replies.