REG Study Group Q4 2016 - Page 67

  • This topic has 2,222 replies, 130 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by hasy.
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #836140
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q4 2016 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    If this is your first post in the study group – please post your target exam date (just the time frame to preserve your anonymity), and your past history with this exam (optional, of course).

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 991 through 1,005 (of 2,222 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #853240
    jonm857
    Participant

    An individual taxpayer reports the following information:

    U.S. Treasury bond income – $100

    Municipal bond income – $200

    Rental income – $500

    Investment interest expense – $1,000

    What amount of investment interest can the taxpayer deduct in the current year?

    a. $800

    b. $300

    c. $1,000

    d. $100

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #853245
    jpowell31
    Participant

    D)?

    Hi bet10. it's scary at first but participation always helps! i'm sitting on Friday so i may not be as involved in a few days as i switch over to the FAR beast and wait a decade and a half for my REG score.

    #853248
    jonm857
    Participant

    Yep, D is correct

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #853267
    jpowell31
    Participant

    this may be a dumb question but we need to add these both back. in layman terms can someone explain why we're adding back the depreciation?. general depreciation amount is less than the accelerated so surely we'd have a larger depreciation deduction under accelerated depreciation and therefore be deducting the $1k? or are these words just to confuse us as normally you'd do MACRS 200 and for AMT MACRS 150 (so add back)…..

    Eastern Corp., a calendar-year corporation, was formed January 3, Year 5, and on that date placed 5-year property in service. The property was depreciated under the general MACRS system. Eastern did not elect to use the straight-line method. The following information pertains to Eastern:

    Eastern's Year 5 taxable income $300,000
    Adjustment for the accelerated
    depreciation taken on Year 5
    5-year property 1,000
    Year 5 tax-exempt interest from
    specified private activity bonds
    issued after August 7, 1986 5,000

    What was Eastern's Year 5 alternative minimum taxable income before the adjusted current earnings (ACE) adjustment?
    300,000+1,000+5,000 = 306,000

    #853279
    jonm857
    Participant

    @jp

    AMT wants that “extra tax depreciation” put back into taxable income so it can have a bigger plate of food to tax.

    So now my counter-question is: in what situation would you “subtract” accelerated depreciation?? It's one of those plus or minus adjustments. I get the “plus” side of it… but when would you need to “subtract”?

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #853293
    jpowell31
    Participant

    i just didn't know if the wording was a little misguiding here. i did see a question however where SL was used for books but it specified in saying SL for books was $20K and for MACRS it was $25k so you had to deduct an additional $5k. the wording there was obvious though

    #853296
    sonja90
    Participant

    Excess for book depreciation over tax depreciation would be be subtracted from taxable income. Because to get taxable income, you added back the disallowed depreciation.

    E&P Depreciation
    To compute E&P, depreciation deductions generally must be determined under the alternative depreciation system (ADS). 20 Under the ADS, depreciation calculations use a straight-line method and depreciable lives that are generally longer than the accelerated depreciable lives permitted for regular tax purposes. 21 If corporations use the accelerated cost recovery system (ACRS) or the modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS) method in computing depreciation for regular taxable income purposes, Sec. 312(k) requires them to adjust E&P for the difference between the two methods.

    – See more at: https://www.thetaxadviser.com/issues/2013/oct/kaiser-oct2013.html?action=print#sthash.QkqxFAsS.dpuf

    #853300
    sonja90
    Participant

    @jp yes the wording is always f— up with this.E&P really makes sense when you think book vs tax income but then they just throw in bunch of the stuff and my brain starts going in all different directions 😀

    #853317
    jpowell31
    Participant

    how about this for tricky wording:

    Which of the following situations would cause a resulting trust to be created?

    I Failure of an express trust
    II Application of the cy pres doctrine
    III Fulfillment of the trust purpose

    #853321
    sonja90
    Participant

    Under a nonnegotiable bill of lading, a carrier who accepts goods for shipment must deliver the goods to:

    A.
    any holder of the bill of lading.

    B.
    any party subsequently named by the seller.

    C.
    the seller who was issued the bill of lading.

    D.
    the consignee of the bill of lading.

    #853324
    sonja90
    Participant

    i've seen that one is it A don;t remember what was the answer

    #853327
    jpowell31
    Participant

    I and III are right for mine.

    D) is the answer for yours?

    #853330
    sonja90
    Participant

    yes it is

    #853336
    sonja90
    Participant

    w

    #853341
    jpowell31
    Participant

    i'm having one of those, “OMG THIS IS SO BORING and USELESS, i miss friends and sunshine and enjoying life in general” moments. i wish i had enough confidence in myself to be one of those people who are like okay, that's enough now. and i need to shut off and relax tomorrow before my exam. anxiety says hahah YEAHRIGHT.

Viewing 15 replies - 991 through 1,005 (of 2,222 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2016 - Page 67’ is closed to new replies.