REG Study Group Q4 2016 - Page 56

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #836140
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q4 2016 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    If this is your first post in the study group – please post your target exam date (just the time frame to preserve your anonymity), and your past history with this exam (optional, of course).

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 826 through 840 (of 2,222 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #851671
    Reg_Slayer
    Participant

    #851680
    sonja90
    Participant

    guess what? if you do decide to do taxes in public accounting you won't need to know most of it LOL 🙂 cuz computer does it for you
    I hope that CPA changes for 2017 will consider the fact that is 21 century 😀

    #851688
    jonm857
    Participant

    Bout to hop on sims for ch. 1…….yeeeeeeeehaw!!!!

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #851691
    sonja90
    Participant

    plus you will most of the time need to do research for stuff that are not commonly used like rehabilitated historic building credit 😀
    thanks god they wont ask that on reg cpa 😀

    #851704
    jonm857
    Participant

    me no likey stock options…. 🙁

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #851710
    jonm857
    Participant

    Starting to feel the pressure now folks. All on the line………..

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #851760
    jpowell31
    Participant

    yeah i need some more examples with stock options. ninja doesn't have many.

    #851775
    jonm857
    Participant

    Yuck.

    – – – – – – –

    Dale received $1,000 in the current year for jury duty. In exchange for regular compensation from her employer during the period of jury service, Dale was required to remit the entire $1,000 to her employer in this year. In Dale's current year income tax return, the $1,000 jury duty fee should be:

    a. Included in taxable income without a corresponding offset against other income.

    b. Claimed as an itemized deduction to the extent exceeding 2% of adjusted gross income.

    c. Claimed in full as an itemized deduction.

    d. Deducted from gross income in arriving at adjusted gross income.

    Choice “d” is correct. The $1,000 jury duty fee that was required to be remitted to the employer may be deducted from gross income in arriving at adjusted gross income. This, in effect, washes out the $1,000 income she will have to report as part of gross income for the jury duty fees paid to her.

    Choices “c” and “b” are incorrect. The amount remitted is allowed as an adjustment in arriving at AGI, not as an itemized deduction.

    Choice “a” is incorrect. A corresponding offset is allowed against other income as an adjustment in arriving at AGI.

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #851782
    jpowell31
    Participant

    that's on my cheat sheet! 🙂

    #851794
    jpowell31
    Participant

    i'm up to 87% trending 78% average with Ninja…feeling a bit better after today's progress but as always i could use another week. SIM's screw me in the head so much. studying them alone is terrifying…

    just think @jon. come dec 7/8 we COULD find out we're done with this WHOLE THING. let's gooooo!

    #851796
    jonm857
    Participant

    qualifying child requirements – CARES

    close relative
    age limit test
    residency test???
    eliminate gross income test (but exemption is required)
    support test changes

    qualifying relative requirements – SUPORT

    support test (more than half)
    under threshold for income??
    precluded from filing a joint return
    o???
    resident of the US, mexico or canada
    or
    lived with the taxpayer the entire year

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #851800
    jonm857
    Participant

    Ahhh I see where I goofed.

    SUPORT is

    support test
    under exemption amount of gross income
    precluded from filing a joint return
    only citizens of the US or residents of US, Mex, or Canada
    relative
    OR
    taxpayer lived with individual (if nonrelative) for the entire year

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #851802
    jonm857
    Participant

    @jp

    yes that would be amazing. I am ready for it to be over.

    NOW.

    B - 81
    A - 87
    R - 73
    F - July 5th

    #851803
    Reg_Slayer
    Participant

    citizen
    income < exemption amount
    relative/live with
    support
    joint return= no

    #851812
    jpowell31
    Participant

    yawn, agency. some of this stuff i could do in my sleep and just when i think i'm wasting my time i read a nugget that i think, oh i forgot that, i bet reading that will get me the extra points i need! when really, it is a waste of time. about 30% of this stuff ends up being on the exam you get and yet here we are. memorizing it all. for no reason. literally.

Viewing 15 replies - 826 through 840 (of 2,222 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2016 - Page 56’ is closed to new replies.