- This topic has 2,222 replies, 130 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 1 month ago by
hasy.
-
CreatorTopic
-
September 14, 2016 at 8:43 pm #836140
jeff
KeymasterWelcome to the Q4 2016 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.
If this is your first post in the study group – please post your target exam date (just the time frame to preserve your anonymity), and your past history with this exam (optional, of course).
-
AuthorReplies
-
December 3, 2016 at 11:04 pm #1370069
HoosierCPA
Participant@namstut no problem! To add to your SIM dilemma I wish I could help. I would like to think the actual exam would recognize a blank as the same thing as zero and vice versa but who knows! I make sure I look carefully at the sim to see if they are clear on what to type but some sims just leave you in the dark!
One of my pet peeves is the sims that stack on top of each other. For instance you need to fill in multiple fields then you will fill in a subtotal line, then a total line. And if you have 1 number wrong that flows into your totals then obviously your total is going to be wrong! I just think it's silly to essentially penalize you twice for missing 1 #. On top of that you have to get 100% on the sim to get the grand total line correct.
FAR - 78
REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
BEC - 82
AUD - Aug 16December 4, 2016 at 8:45 am #1370162demarcon
ParticipantThe exam doesn't recognize blanks if there should be zeros entered. It will tell you in the last line of the question specifically how to format the response, though. So read and re-read that so you get it right. You'll be much more focused on exam day than you are doing practice exams. The thing that keeps me motivated is when I get a question wrong and can go “Oohhhh!!! I remember that!” then it almost immediately clicks from then on. That's why it's so important to read all answers.
December 4, 2016 at 9:16 am #1370177HoosierCPA
Participant@demarcon thanks, makes sense–they aren't going to reward people and give them points if they may not even have attempted a sim.
FAR - 78
REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
BEC - 82
AUD - Aug 16December 4, 2016 at 10:02 am #1370208HoosierCPA
ParticipantHere is a question related to the stock options used as bonuses:
“Logan, an employee of Argon Industries, earned a salary of $60,000 in year 2. In addition, the following two transactions between Logan and Argon occurred in year 2: Logan received a bonus of 100 shares of publicly traded stock worth $13,000 with a basis to Argon of $8,000, and Logan purchased 1,000 shares of unrestricted Argon stock pursuant to a nonqualifying stock option plan for $10 per share when stock was valued at $25 per share. What amount of compensation should Argon report in Logan's Form W-2 for year 2?”
So I understand the non-qualifying stock option (25-10×1000)= 15,000 included in wages. Now for the “Logan received a bonus of 100 shares of publicly traded stock worth 13k”…is that always going to be included? And if so, it's always going to be FMV?
Trying to cover all my ends here! lol
FAR - 78
REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
BEC - 82
AUD - Aug 16December 4, 2016 at 10:12 am #1370211HoosierCPA
ParticipantWow, here's a fun problem!:
Blake, a single individual age 67, had a 2016 adjusted gross income of $60,000 exclusive of Social Security benefits. Blake received Social Security benefits of $8,400 and interest of $1,000 on tax-exempt obligations during 2016. What amount of Social Security benefits is excludable from Blake's 2016 taxable income?
A.$0
B $4,200
C.$4,700
D. $1,260 — CORRECT
Explanation:
“A portion of a taxpayer's Social Security benefits may be taxable.
For single taxpayers with provisional income above $34,000, gross income includes the lesser of:
85% of Social Security benefits received or
85% of excess of provisional income (defined as modified AGI + 1/2 Social Security benefit) over $34,000, plus the smaller of:
the amount includible under the old law (1/2 of Social Security) or
$4,500.1. 0.85 x $8,400 = $7,140
2. $60,000 AGI
+ 1,000 Interest on tax-exempt obligations
——-
$61,000 Modified AGI
+ 4,200 1/2 of Social Security
——-
$65,200 Provisional income
– 34,000 Threshold amount
——-
$31,200 x .85 = $26,520
+ 4,200 Lesser of $4,200 or $4,500
——-
$30,720
=======LESSER OF (1) OR (2) = $7,140 (This is the INCLUDIBLE amount)
$8,400 total Social Security benefits
– 7,140 includible amount
——
$1,260 is EXCLUDABLE from taxable income
======”I'm trying to pick my battles and am not sure this is even worth spending my time trying to memorize :/
FAR - 78
REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
BEC - 82
AUD - Aug 16December 4, 2016 at 10:37 am #1370226demarcon
ParticipantThe non-qualifying stock option is the difference. Think of it this way. He has to exercise the option and actually PAY for the stock to get it.. The other amount is GIVEN to him at FMV, he doesn't have to pay for it at all.
For the taxable social security benefits just remember that income < $25,000 none of it is taxable, and income > $60,000 85% is included in tax. You don't have to know any of the numbers in the middle.
December 4, 2016 at 11:38 am #1370255HoosierCPA
Participant@demarcon thank you! Sounds like you'r more then prepared for this exam! haha There hasn't been one topic on this thread that's stumped you!
FAR - 78
REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
BEC - 82
AUD - Aug 16December 4, 2016 at 12:32 pm #1370280demarcon
ParticipantI hope so. I'm losing my mind during these last 4 days of cramming. I just bought Gleim sims, and other than some crazy exceptions that I've never seen I'm doing alright on them. It's giving me good practice for searching the AL too. The Ninja AL is pretty bad, and even though Gleim isn't updated with new limits it's almost fully functional.
December 4, 2016 at 12:40 pm #1370292HoosierCPA
Participant@demarcon yeah the advanced search might be the only thing I noticed Gleim not having.
Gleim has really helped me, sounds like you had most of it down but it definitely exposed some of my weaknesses. I just finished all 20 of them a couple days ago and plan on working through all the corp and individual tax ones again. Those are the ones I see most likely to be on the exam.
FAR - 78
REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
BEC - 82
AUD - Aug 16December 4, 2016 at 1:05 pm #1370318Namstut
Participant@dtatham,
I haven't seen one single question in Becker asking how to calc the taxable amount of SS. The closest it got to was ask what would be the max percentage that could be taxable and the answer was 85%.I would say that if it comes easy – study, if not – skip and drill into something else that you have to study more.
AUD 7/6/16 Passed
BEC 9/3/16
FAR TBD
REG TBDDecember 4, 2016 at 1:57 pm #1370352Anonymous
Inactive@zomord – I'm also in the Dallas area (Carrollton) and would be interested in studying on the weekends now through early Jan.
December 4, 2016 at 2:00 pm #1370358Sticky Nicky
Participantlove seeing roger & ninja mcqs that arent touched in roger text,,ridic
December 4, 2016 at 7:39 pm #1370666Yolonge
ParticipantBaker, an unmarried individual, sold a personal residence, which has an adjusted basis of $70,000, for $165,000. Baker owned and lived in the residence for seven years. Selling expenses were $10,000. Four weeks prior to the sale, Baker paid a handyman $1,000 to paint and fix up the residence. What is the amount of Baker's recognized gain?
I know answer is no recognized gain, but what would be the gain if person stayed only 1 year (not qualified)? since repair was done 4 months ago, is this 165000 – 70000 – 10000 ?
Materials: Wiley book + Ninja MCQ
FAR - 83 (Jan 2016)
Study time: 6 weeks
BEC - 87 (April 2016)
Study time: 2 weeks
AUD - 92 (July 2016), (74 Feb 2016), (72 May 2016)
Study time: 4 (Feb) + 2 (May) + 3 (July) = 9 weeks total
REG - (70 April 2016)
Study time: 3 weeksDecember 4, 2016 at 8:19 pm #1370730hasy
ParticipantThis being my last exam, I feel that these exams are a mixture of tricky questions. It's like they're not testing you on actual application of the knowledge but how carefully you read the words. I just got a question on the 1934 act and one of the options were ‘negligence by the CPA' and I'm like, >.<” I didn't get it wrong because I remembered it was gross negligence, but SERIOUSLY AICPA? WHY? I just want to pass and not ever care about this again…… sighs..This studying is totally getting to me. I'm losing so much steam less than a week before the exam.
Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, ambition inspired, and success achieved - Helen Keller
-
BEC 80 (10/23/15)
FAR 72 (4/2/15); 83 (7/11/16)
REG 52 (4/28/15)
AUD (9/9/16)Roger + NINJA MCQ + WTB
December 4, 2016 at 11:29 pm #1370940vorobjeva44
ParticipantHi guys! Quick question for those who already took this exam. Do we have to memorize all thresholds? For example: AMT Individuals : Exemption amounts Single 53900 AMTI 119700$ and etc.
Also about tax credits: are they actually ask to calculate them? Ohhhh, it is such a mess in my head right now!!! 🙁 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2016 - Page 126’ is closed to new replies.