- This topic has 4,354 replies, 165 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by
pia ach.
-
CreatorTopic
-
August 30, 2014 at 3:34 pm #188296
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
November 6, 2014 at 5:26 pm #630009
linkman311MemberCan you further explain the wash sale loss (ie, show the calculation)? I always get confused by these.
Confidence is a prerequisite for success
FAR - 1/1
AUD - 1/1
BEC - 1/1
REG - Q4Have Becker, wish I got Roger
November 6, 2014 at 5:47 pm #630010
MamabearMember@Linkman–So here was the problem I posted:
Miller, an individual calendar-year taxpayer, purchased 100 shares of Maples Inc. common stock for $10K on July 10, 2012, and an additional 50 shares of Maples Inc. common stock for $4K on December 24, 2012. On January 8, 2013, Miller sold the 100 shares purchased on July 10, 2012 for $7K. What is the amount of Miller's recognized loss for 2013 and what is the basis for her remaining 50 shares of Maples Inc. Stock?
Timeline: 07/10/12 Bought 100 shares for $10K
12/24/12: Bought another 50 shares for $4K
01/08/13 (less than 30 days after buying 50 more shares): Sell original 100 shares for $7K
If he hadn't bought the other 50 shares then the recognized loss on the original 100 would have been $3K. BUT he did buy the other 50 shares so technically it was like swapping 50 shares for 50 shares of the same stock and only really selling 50 shares from the original set. 50/100=50% so you can only recognize 50% of the $3K loss that would have been recognized without the additional purchase. The remaining 50% gets added to the basis of the second purchase. So recognized loss = $1,500 and the basis for the remaining shares =$4K + $1,500 of the loss not recognized = $5,500.
I hope that didn't make it more confusing. Remember that it is considered a wash rule if the second purchase occurs within 30 days (before or after) the sale.
CPA Exam - Finally DONE (November 2014)
BEC (08/10/13) 80
AUD (08/24/13) 65 (11/13/13) 85
FAR (04/12/14) 81
REG (07/19/14) 69 (11/29/14) 87!!November 6, 2014 at 6:35 pm #630011
AnonymousInactiveI will be joining the party this weekend. Mamabear — when are you retaking the test?
Have to pass this one before AUD rolls off…..
November 6, 2014 at 7:05 pm #630013
MamabearMember11/29 for me. Not feeling ready at all. What is the best way to memorize the little details? Working MCQ over and over didn't work for me last time. Should I do flashcards over and over? I get the big picture on everything, but I cannot remember all the little details to save my life. What do you guys do?
CPA Exam - Finally DONE (November 2014)
BEC (08/10/13) 80
AUD (08/24/13) 65 (11/13/13) 85
FAR (04/12/14) 81
REG (07/19/14) 69 (11/29/14) 87!!November 6, 2014 at 7:07 pm #630014
WANNABE_CPAMember@Taxlady and 2014cpahopefully…great lets get together and beat this beast up..I have lots to do but i am not getting down anymore, whatever happens..DO or DIE situation(Die means Pain to study this again lol) so good motivation.
@2014 ..I am taking test one day before you..
FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God 🙂
BEC : 78 (8/27) 🙂
REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) 🙂
AUD : 69,67, 07/23November 6, 2014 at 7:08 pm #630015
AnonymousInactiveNovember 6, 2014 at 7:10 pm #630016
WANNABE_CPAMember@mamabear… what helped me in last exams is until i did not seriously mark down things that trouble me and went over and over with the concept, until i am comfortable with it..i could not get Mcqs right…so thats what i am going to do now…get over everything one by one and be sure about little concepts and details, until then i will not get discouraged with wrong Mcqs.
Hope that helps, coz from our last quiz session, u did better than me…YOu can do it !!!!
FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God 🙂
BEC : 78 (8/27) 🙂
REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) 🙂
AUD : 69,67, 07/23November 6, 2014 at 7:19 pm #630017
How many letters do you needParticipantMamabear: I think you know this from our FAR group but I have two sections of my notes. One for major topics that aren't flowing that I like to review and think on…try to get the logic. The other section is a collection of details that have tripped me up during MCQ review. I collect all those details and in the final week memorize away. I still have holes come exam day…everybody does but that helps fill in a lot of them…
MBA,CMA,CPA, CFF?, ABV?
November 6, 2014 at 7:20 pm #630018
MamabearMemberUm no. I did awful on our quiz session. I got every one that I posted wrong until I saw the answer. And I had already gone over those once before. It's easy to answer things immediately after reading the section they pertain to, but the long term memorization is a huge problem for me. Thanks for the encouragement. I need to step up my game. 23 days will go by in a heart beat. Let's all nail this!!
CPA Exam - Finally DONE (November 2014)
BEC (08/10/13) 80
AUD (08/24/13) 65 (11/13/13) 85
FAR (04/12/14) 81
REG (07/19/14) 69 (11/29/14) 87!!November 6, 2014 at 7:22 pm #630019
MamabearMember@howmany–Basis trips me up no matter how many times I go over it and I know that is a big portion of the exam. It's frustrating as hell.
CPA Exam - Finally DONE (November 2014)
BEC (08/10/13) 80
AUD (08/24/13) 65 (11/13/13) 85
FAR (04/12/14) 81
REG (07/19/14) 69 (11/29/14) 87!!November 6, 2014 at 7:35 pm #630020
Julia_anikaMemberHello, I need your HELP PLEASE!
Sally Markey, who owns a heavy construction company, decided to spend some of her $2,000,000 2014 profit on a heavy-duty diesel truck costing $811,000 for her business. In order to lower her income taxes for the year, she decided to take the maximum Section 179 deduction plus the MACRS depreciation for 7-year property. The ceiling for Section 179 in 2014 is $25,000. No other capital assets were purchased during 2014. What is the total deduction for the truck in 2014?
Why in this question 25K deduction is not reduced? 811K is more than 200K…
NYC, NY
FAR - 82 Jan 2014
AUD - 86 Apr 2014
BEC - 77 Aug 2014
REG - 79 Nov 2014November 6, 2014 at 7:46 pm #630021
MamabearMemberSomeone posted that question a few days ago and the only comment about it was that the question must be incorrect. Is that from Ninja? If so, Jeff may be able to help answer, but you may have to start a new thread for it to make sure he sees the question. I agree that it doesn't make sense to not reduce the amount dollar for dollar over $200K to the point that Sally wouldn't be allowed to take the Section 179 deduction.
CPA Exam - Finally DONE (November 2014)
BEC (08/10/13) 80
AUD (08/24/13) 65 (11/13/13) 85
FAR (04/12/14) 81
REG (07/19/14) 69 (11/29/14) 87!!November 6, 2014 at 8:16 pm #630022
Julia_anikaMemberYes, it's from ninja MCQ. There are like 4-5 similar questions and none of them reduces 25K.
Ok, I'll make a separate post because I really want to know if it's a mistake or I'm missing something.
NYC, NY
FAR - 82 Jan 2014
AUD - 86 Apr 2014
BEC - 77 Aug 2014
REG - 79 Nov 2014November 6, 2014 at 8:18 pm #630023
jeffKeymasterNovember 6, 2014 at 8:39 pm #630024
Julia_anikaMemberSo, the answer should be 115,857?
NYC, NY
FAR - 82 Jan 2014
AUD - 86 Apr 2014
BEC - 77 Aug 2014
REG - 79 Nov 2014 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 57’ is closed to new replies.
