- This topic has 4,354 replies, 165 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by
pia ach.
-
CreatorTopic
-
August 30, 2014 at 3:34 pm #188296
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
October 31, 2014 at 9:39 pm #629919
taxgeek83ParticipantNovember 1, 2014 at 3:54 pm #629920
AnonymousInactiveSo what is the rule on regulation D 506? Now general soliciting advertising is allowed? On Wiley it has a question that has advertising still disallowed.
November 1, 2014 at 5:43 pm #629921
MjganierParticipantLooking for some clarification on this MCQ for Section 179.
Sally Markey, who owns a heavy construction company, decided to spend some of her $2,000,000 2014 profit on a heavy-duty diesel truck costing $811,000 for her business. In order to lower her income taxes for the year, she decided to take the maximum Section 179 deduction plus the MACRS depreciation for 7-year property. The ceiling for Section 179 in 2014 is $25,000. No other capital assets were purchased during 2014. What is the total deduction for the truck in 2014?
A.
$25,000
B.
$137,319
C.
$112,319
D.
$405,500
B is correct.
Sally Markey took the largest Section 179 deduction available in 2014, $25,000. This reduced the truck tax basis to $786,000 ($811,000 – $25,000). Depreciation available for the first year of MACRS is $112,319 ($786,000 × 0.1429). Total expense is $137,319 for the year ($25,000 + $112,319).
I don't see how she could have taken the section 179 deduction since the truck purchase was over the 200,000 limit. She could take the MACRS depreciation though which, according to a previous question I came across, takes DDB on the first year depreciation. Whereas in this case it's only 1/7. I appreciate any and all clarification. Thanks!
FAR 8/18/2014--87
AUD 10/18/2014--78
REG 11/24/2014--76
BEC 2/28/2015--76"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"-Albert Einstein
Study Mats: Cpaexcel study text and EQ, Ninja MCQ, Ninja notes
November 1, 2014 at 6:11 pm #629922
MjganierParticipantHere is another question but in this case, it mentions the 200,000 limit.
Green Valley, Inc., purchased and placed in service a $130,000 piece of used equipment in a year with a maximum allowable Section 179 amount of $25,000 and a ceiling of $200,000 of qualifying property. No other property was placed into service during the year. The equipment is 7-year property. The first-year depreciation for 7-year property is 14.29%. Before considering any depreciation deduction, Green Valley had $300,000 of taxable income. Rounding to the nearest dollar, what amount is the maximum allowable depreciation deduction?
A.
$130,000
B.
$25,000
C.
$15,005
Correct D.
$40,005
Under Section 179 of the Internal Revenue Code, the taxpayer may elect to expense up to $25,000 of tangible personal property placed in service during the year through 2014. Both new and used property qualify. The basis of the asset must be reduced by the amount so expensed.
Two limits apply. First, the amount “expensed” cannot exceed the taxpayer’s aggregate taxable income from trade or business activities. Second, the ceiling amount of $25,000 for 2014 is reduced dollar-for-dollar for personal property acquisitions in excess of $200,000 (i.e., if more than $200,000 of property is placed in service during a tax year, no Section 179 deduction is allowed). In this case, the equipment purchased was less than the limit of $200,000 and is not reduced.
Section 179 expense is deducted first, and then the regular depreciation is calculated.
Section 179 expense $25,000
Regular depreciation (0.1429
x ($130,000 – $25,000) 15,005
Total $40,005
Is the previous question I posted incorrect?
FAR 8/18/2014--87
AUD 10/18/2014--78
REG 11/24/2014--76
BEC 2/28/2015--76"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"-Albert Einstein
Study Mats: Cpaexcel study text and EQ, Ninja MCQ, Ninja notes
November 2, 2014 at 4:57 am #629923
kappa1032Participant@ Mjganier – I think the 1st question that you posted must be incorrect. I don't see how it could be B given what we know about the $200K limit. Also, the 1st question doesn't even give the MACRS depreciation rate, so how could you even calculation the remaining depreciation?
FAR - 81
REG - 74, 87
AUD - 88
BEC - 88Finally.
“The only guarantee for failure is to stop trying”
― John C. MaxwellNovember 2, 2014 at 5:17 pm #629924
AnonymousInactiveThe personal exemption for 2013 was $3900 (that's what on my material), 2014 is $3950 and 2015 will be $4000. If I will take the exam on Q1 of 2015, should I be using 2014 amount?
I'm not sure if this is included in the exam but something to keep in mind, just in case.
Edit: Also, the standard deductions increase in 2014.
November 3, 2014 at 6:40 am #629925
linkman311MemberIn a research question, if the answer is a section with just one paragraph (therefore no numbered paragraphs), what should I enter in the paragraph space? Leave it blank? Or put 1? Becker doesn't shed any light on this.
Confidence is a prerequisite for success
FAR - 1/1
AUD - 1/1
BEC - 1/1
REG - Q4Have Becker, wish I got Roger
November 3, 2014 at 7:40 pm #629926
Julia_anikaMemberHere I'm again with another question.
I've started doing ninja MCQs and found that some info in the ninja notes contradict MCQ's answer.
Please tell me what is correct: Estate beneficiaries pay tax on DNI regardless if distributed (as per the notes) or only if distributed (as per mcq explanation).
Thank you!
NYC, NY
FAR - 82 Jan 2014
AUD - 86 Apr 2014
BEC - 77 Aug 2014
REG - 79 Nov 2014November 4, 2014 at 12:43 am #629927
mynameisjennMemberNINJA MCQ: Looking for some clarification on this. Please help. I still dont get it!
Question #: 1367 Category: 6D2 Determination of Ordinary Income/Loss and Separately Stated Items
Graphite Corp. has been a calendar-year S corporation since its inception on January 2, 2004. On January 1, 2014, Smith and Tyler each owned 50% of the Graphite stock, in which their respective bases were $12,000 and $9,000. For the year ended December 31, 2014, Graphite has $80,000 in ordinary business income and $6,000 in tax-exempt income. Graphite made a $53,000 cash distribution to each shareholder on December 31, 2014. What total amount of income from Graphite is includible in Smith's 2014 adjusted gross income?
A.
$96,000
B.
$93,000
C.
$43,000
D.
$40,000
ANS:
The correct answer is D.
In an S corporation, income is taxed when earned, not when distributed, unless distributions exceed owners' share of earnings + basis. In this case, Smith gets 50% of ($80,000 taxable income + $6,000 nontaxable income). This yields a new basis of $55,000 ($12,000 beginning basis + $43,000 increase in basis = $55,000), which is greater than distributions. Thus, taxable income is limited to Smith's share of Graphite's taxable income, or 50% of $80,000. After the distribution, Smith's basis is $2,000 (basis of $55,000 reduced by a distribution of $53,000 = $2,000).
Basis at 01/01/14 $12,000
Share of ordinary income 40,000
Share of tax-exempt income 3,000
New basis 55,000
Distribution (53,000)
Basis at 12/31/14 $ 2,000
=========
November 4, 2014 at 1:07 am #629928
taxgeek83Participant@Myname – Which part are you having trouble with?
November 4, 2014 at 1:34 am #629929
mynameisjennMember@taxgeek83 Oh! I get it now! I didnt understand why its 40,000 for AGI includible amounts. i just read the questions and explanations over and over and finally get it! I guess I have to go over the AGI calculation items again. Thanks! =)
November 4, 2014 at 1:35 am #629930
taxgeek83ParticipantNo problem! Glad you figured it out! Try pulling up a 1040 instead of just memorizing an AGI formula. I'm a visual learner, so seeing things laid out helps me learn. If you understand the front page of the 1040, you'll get AGI in no time.
November 4, 2014 at 2:31 am #629931
Ninja JuiceParticipantNovember 4, 2014 at 2:31 am #629932
Ninja JuiceParticipantNovember 4, 2014 at 2:34 pm #629933
MICpaCandidate89ParticipantHey guys, first post here. I have been following this forum for a while and decided that maybe if I get involved, it will help me to do better on these tests by researching answers, and helping others. I am taking REG 11/30 and it is IMPERATIVE that I pass as I have only passed BEC back in April, and time is ticking! I am struggling with incorporating C-Corps. I have seen this question already posted but the answer didn't satisfy what I was looking to understand. The question is as follows:
“Quigley, Roberk and Storm form a Corporation. Quigley exchanges $25K legal fees for 30 shares. Roberk exchanges land with a basis of $10K and FMV $100K for 60 shares. Sorm exchanges $10K cash for 10 shares of stock. What amount of income should each recognize?”
The answer is Quigley = $25K, Roberk $90K, Storm $0. I understand Quigley and Storm, but why would Roberk recognize a gain on the property when none of the exceptions apply? (services, boot, liabs, and collectively >80% interest) The way I understand the rule it is that No gains/losses recognized on transfer of property when it's transferred solely in exchange for property and immediately receive >80% interest; but the exceptions are 1. boot is received, 2. services rendered 3. liabilities are transferred. All i can think of is that individually he has less than 80%, but there are many other MCQ solutions that disagree with that logic, they say that if collectively all the incorporators have >80% then individually they are OK. I appreciate the help, sorry for the long first post!
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 51’ is closed to new replies.
