REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 48

Viewing 15 replies - 706 through 720 (of 4,354 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #629873
    SomedayCPA2015
    Participant

    The 100,000 in dividend revenue is not included in the gross income from operations, so you must add it to the 600,000.

    700,000 – 400,000 – 80,000 (DRD) = 220,000

    Does that help?

    REG - Passed
    BEC - Passed
    AUD - Passed
    FAR - Passed!!!! I have my life back.

    #629874
    Tax lady
    Participant

    @Julia. I'm trying to figure this out too. Should the answer be 220,000? (300,000-80,000)?

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired 🙁
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

    #629875
    Tax lady
    Participant

    @CPAHOPEFULL I think about joint tenancy as someone you buy a house with. If you buy a house with your spouse and they die then their interest goes to you. With tenancy in common, I think about a timeshare because they can sell, will, or mortgage their piece of the interest.

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired 🙁
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

    #629876
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    That's right, you have to add dividend income to gross income first, then use the DRD.

    Thanks tax lady, that makes sense. I just don't get the right to survivorship after the death.

    #629877
    Julia_anika
    Member

    Wait, DRD should be calculated as 80% * taxable income (if no loss created by the DRD), and not the dividend income.

    80% * 100 is only calculated when there is a loss situation.. No?

    I'm totally lost (((

    NYC, NY
    FAR - 82 Jan 2014
    AUD - 86 Apr 2014
    BEC - 77 Aug 2014
    REG - 79 Nov 2014

    #629878
    Tax lady
    Participant

    You multiply the percentage by the dividends received. DRD is limited by taxable income unless the DRD creates or adds to a loss. In your example, this was not an issue because income was higher than the DRD. If taxable income is lower than dividends received, then you multiply the percentage by taxable income. If I am incorrect, then someone please chime in. This is how I have learned it.

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired 🙁
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

    #629879
    Tax lady
    Participant

    Example: If corp owns 20% of stock in a domestic corp, and has taxable income of $200 and dividends rec'd of $100, then DRD = $70 (70% * $100). If taxable income were $90, and dividends were $100, then DRD is $63 (70% * $90).

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired 🙁
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

    #629880
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    No, you're right that's exactly how it works. So seems like you are ready to go for the exam tax lady.

    #629881
    Tax lady
    Participant

    I don't feel ready! LOL

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired 🙁
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

    #629882
    Julia_anika
    Member

    Tax Lady, many thanks!!!

    NYC, NY
    FAR - 82 Jan 2014
    AUD - 86 Apr 2014
    BEC - 77 Aug 2014
    REG - 79 Nov 2014

    #629883
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    You are ready, just look at the amount of questions you have answered here.

    #629884
    iman_a
    Member

    AUD - 96
    BEC - 85
    REG - 81
    FAR - 11/28

    #629886
    romajoon
    Member

    Taking REG again in about a month. Any advice on how to tackle this brutal section? I preformed strong on most sections of the MCQ, but weak on SIMs and Taxation on Entities MCQ. I think just hammering MCQ and re-writing my notes should help a lot.

    AUD 2/25/14 - 82
    BEC 4/14/14 - 82
    REG 7/5/14 - 66, 80 (11/30/14)
    FAR 10/13/14 - 76
    ETHICS - PASSED
    EXPERIENCE - DONE

    #629887
    linkman311
    Member

    @lobnat, thanks I totally blanked on the phaseout range part.

    I'm ready to get this last part over with. Thanks for those that post frequent questions and answers, this is really helpful. The Q3 BEC study group had a number of people posting questions/answers which really helped – I'm pretty sure most/all(?) of the people who were active and taking it seriously passed.

    Stick with it everyone! Part of the prestige is having to earn those letters. This quote always gets me going (think of non-CPA average Joe people you know):

    “…That's the difference between you and me – you want to lose small and I want to win BIG.”

    Confidence is a prerequisite for success

    FAR - 1/1
    AUD - 1/1
    BEC - 1/1
    REG - Q4

    Have Becker, wish I got Roger

    #629888
    Tax lady
    Participant

    I finally have alimony recapture figured out! This was something I didn't know the 1st go round…..

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired 🙁
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

Viewing 15 replies - 706 through 720 (of 4,354 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 48’ is closed to new replies.