REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 47

Viewing 15 replies - 691 through 705 (of 4,354 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #629858
    MAGGIE1234
    Participant

    @leglock Thanks a lot!!!I think this calculation better matches the theory…

    AUD - 69,95
    BEC - 86
    FAR - 82
    REG - 56,82

    I finally made it!!!!!Thank YOU!!!!!!!!

    #629859
    shinallsm
    Member

    @leglock I thought the max IRA deduction was 5k ?

    REG - 90 - 10/31/14
    FAR - 77 - 1/3/15
    AUD - 89 - 4/1/15
    BEC - ?? - 5/27/15

    #629860

    Mamma: How is REG treating you? When is your exam?

    MBA,CMA,CPA, CFF?, ABV?

    #629861
    leglock
    Participant

    5000 was for 2013. 5500 is for this hear and what is testable

    #629862
    Mamabear
    Member

    @howmany–My exam is 11/29. I'm behind on my studies, but I feel like I'm getting it more this time around. I'm reading the book this time and taking plenty of notes. I'm not a fan of reading the book, but I think it helps with the bigger picture for REG. How is AUD treating you?

    CPA Exam - Finally DONE (November 2014)
    BEC (08/10/13) 80
    AUD (08/24/13) 65 (11/13/13) 85
    FAR (04/12/14) 81
    REG (07/19/14) 69 (11/29/14) 87!!

    #629863
    jeff
    Keymaster

    This question has been updated. Get the new question here:

    https://www.another71.com/introducing-ninja-mcq-adaptive-learning-technology/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

    #629864
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    A convenant not to compete is an asset if the person you buy the property agrees not to compete for lets say 10 years?

    #629865
    lobnat
    Member

    In regards to MAGGIE1234's question, the way I understand it is, the maximum deduction amount for 2014 is $5,500, but you can't deduct more than what was contributed. In the question it states that $4,000 was contributed. The $800 exclusion from the deduction is calculated as:

    $4,000 (amount over the 181,000 beginning phaseout amount under the special rule for one covered, one not)

    x 2 (married filing jointly, one for each spouse under special rule for one covered, one not)

    / 10

    = $800.

    You would then subtract that from the $4,000 contribution amount to arrive at the $3,200 deduction.

    If the contribution amount would have been $5,500, then the $800 would have been subtracted from the $5,500 limit instead of the $4,000.

    I think the explanation got confusing when the AGI amount over the 181,000 phase out and the contribution amount are both $4,000

    B - 80
    A - 82
    R - 79
    F - 77

    Boom

    "No shortcuts, work for it."

    #629866
    linkman311
    Member

    ^^ Makes sense, but where does the divided by 10 come from? Am I missing something?

    Confidence is a prerequisite for success

    FAR - 1/1
    AUD - 1/1
    BEC - 1/1
    REG - Q4

    Have Becker, wish I got Roger

    #629867
    lobnat
    Member

    @linkmann311, I think it can be calculated this way as well, which might make more sense:

    $4,000 x ((185,000-181,000)/($10,000×2))

    $4,000 x ($4,000/$20,000)

    $4,000 x 0.2

    =$800

    $4,000 = Contribution amount

    185,000-181,000 = The amount over the beginning phase out amount (happens to also be $4,000)

    $10,000 x 2 = phase out range (181,000 thru 191,000 for the special rule where one is covered one in not and the spouses are filing a joint return) times 2 for each individual.

    Hope this helps. Feel free to correct me if I'm mistaken, but that's how I've been doing all the MCQ's I've seen on this and it's worked so far.

    B - 80
    A - 82
    R - 79
    F - 77

    Boom

    "No shortcuts, work for it."

    #629868

    Mama: ugh to me it's just as bad as REG but just a different kind of bad. Two weeks out and feel overwhelmed so I guess I'm right on track hah….this last exam stuff definitely adds additional pressure. Trying to not think about that right now though…that's what the two weeks between exam day and score release are for:)

    As with the other three Im just going to prepare as well as I know how…follow my silly rituals…do the best I can on exam day and hope for a 75+.

    That's good news on your studies! It will help big time to have an understanding about all that stuff come exam day. I think I've already forgotten more than I remember….

    MBA,CMA,CPA, CFF?, ABV?

    #629869

    Sorry, edit because WRONG subtopic. I'm losing my mind. Haha

    REG - 87 (Becker)
    AUD - 96 (Becker & Ninja MCQs)
    FAR - 85 (Becker, Ninja MCQs, Audio and Blitz)
    BEC - Last one! Waiting on score release 11/24!

    Remember: a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step

    #629870
    Julia_anika
    Member

    Please HELP. Question from WTB. I don't agree with their correct answer.

    Beta, a C corporation, reported the following items of income and expenses for the year:

    Gross income from operations $600,000

    Dividend income from a 30% owned domestic corporation 100,000

    Operating expenses 400,000

    What is Beta’s taxable income for the year?

    Since DRD doesn't create loss I believe it should be calculated as 80% of taxable income, and not 80% * 100.

    NYC, NY
    FAR - 82 Jan 2014
    AUD - 86 Apr 2014
    BEC - 77 Aug 2014
    REG - 79 Nov 2014

    #629871
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    What was the answer? Was it 120,000?

    Also, can someone tell me the difference between joint tenancy and tenancy in common with an example?

    #629872
    Julia_anika
    Member

    No, their answer is 220,000 ((( I also thought it should be 120K.

    NYC, NY
    FAR - 82 Jan 2014
    AUD - 86 Apr 2014
    BEC - 77 Aug 2014
    REG - 79 Nov 2014

Viewing 15 replies - 691 through 705 (of 4,354 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 47’ is closed to new replies.