REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 46

Viewing 15 replies - 676 through 690 (of 4,354 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #629842
    Tax lady
    Participant

    Oh yea? Are you using it for REG and FAR? I've heard good things about it.

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired ๐Ÿ™
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

    #629843
    ProdigalCPA
    Member

    @tax lady

    I used it for my AUD retake (my original score was a 64).

    I did not use it the first time taking REG , but I should have especially since I live in the Bahamas and everything tax related was somewhat new to me ( I went to college in the U.S.)

    I have not started studying for FAR yet but I plan on using the Roger Cram for that also. I love his lectures!!

    AUD - 81 Expired,
    REG - 59, 61,
    BEC - 78 Expired,
    FAR - 48 (did not complete the study material AT ALL),

    "We are judged by what we finish, not by what we start"

    "One day in retrospect, the years of struggle will strike you as the most beautiful"

    #629844
    Tax lady
    Participant

    @Prodigal I might check those out. I'm taking AUD next. Trying to fit it in before tax season. I do taxes and audits in my job. (And still failed REG!! GAH) But, I dread FAR the most. :-/

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired ๐Ÿ™
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

    #629845
    ProdigalCPA
    Member

    @ tax lady

    I do also but I have no choice but to pass FAR in February, my AUD expires the end of that month ๐Ÿ™

    AUD - 81 Expired,
    REG - 59, 61,
    BEC - 78 Expired,
    FAR - 48 (did not complete the study material AT ALL),

    "We are judged by what we finish, not by what we start"

    "One day in retrospect, the years of struggle will strike you as the most beautiful"

    #629846
    Tax lady
    Participant

    Oh yikes! I'm sure that is stressful. You can do it! And you are almost done so that's a huge motivation.

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired ๐Ÿ™
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

    #629847
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Excluded UBIs [Unrelated Business Income] items are nontaxable, correct?

    #629848
    Mamabear
    Member

    Amor–I haven't restudied that yet, but I thought unrelated business income was taxable because it was when charities made income that was unrelated to their charity. I could be completely wrong because I haven't studied that since July.

    CPA Exam - Finally DONE (November 2014)
    BEC (08/10/13) 80
    AUD (08/24/13) 65 (11/13/13) 85
    FAR (04/12/14) 81
    REG (07/19/14) 69 (11/29/14) 87!!

    #629849
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Mamabear you are right. Unrelated business income items are taxable to the not-for-profit.

    #629850
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Why can't corporations have a net capital loss?

    #629852
    MAGGIE1234
    Participant

    Can anyone help with this question?

    Rita Spano is an active participant in a company retirement plan. Her husband, John, age 45, works for a company that does not have a retirement plan. The Spanos' joint adjusted gross income for 2014 is $185,000. John contributes $4,000 to an IRA for himself. How much of this $4,000 contribution for John can the Spanos deduct on their 2014 joint return?

    A.

    $4,000

    B.

    $3,200

    C.

    $2,000

    D.

    $0

    Answer: B

    Beginning in 1998, individuals are not considered participants in a company retirement plan simply because their spouses are. However, the maximum deductible IRA contribution for a nonparticipant spouse is phased out for couples with joint return adjusted gross incomes between $181,000 and $191,000. In this case, the Spanos' AGI is $4,000 over the beginning of the $10,000 phaseout range so their maximum $4,000 deduction is reduced by $800 ($4,000 ร— 2 รท 10) to arrive at $3,200.

    Like I can understand the theory, but when it comes to calculation, no idea at all………

    AUD - 69,95
    BEC - 86
    FAR - 82
    REG - 56,82

    I finally made it!!!!!Thank YOU!!!!!!!!

    #629853
    taxgeek83
    Participant

    @CPAHOPEFUL – Where are you reading that corporations cannot have an NOL? My understanding is that C corporations have NOLs because they are taxed at the entity level. S corporations do not have NOLs because they are taxed at the shareholder level. The S corporation will pass any operating loss through to the shareholder, and the shareholder will have to determine if he or she has an individual NOL resulting from the S corporation loss. Does that make sense?

    EDIT: Nevermind – I read your question wrong. Sorry!!!

    #629854
    leglock
    Participant

    I'm curious as to if anyone knows the answer to Maggie's question from 2 posts above. Using the Becker materials, my answer would have been 3300. Hopefully someone will clarify.

    #629855
    wmcpa
    Member

    Hi leglock. I'm curious too. I calculated the same answer as yours at $3,300, and I used the IRS website – publication 590 as guidance.

    FAR: 83
    REG: 69, 69, retake Q1 2015
    AUD: Q2 2015
    BEC: Q2 2015

    #629856
    MAGGIE1234
    Participant

    @leglock how is your answer calculated???

    AUD - 69,95
    BEC - 86
    FAR - 82
    REG - 56,82

    I finally made it!!!!!Thank YOU!!!!!!!!

    #629857
    leglock
    Participant

    They exceeded the agi limit by 4000 (185000 – 181000) and the agi limit range is 10000 (181000 to 19100). So u divide the amount they exceeded the lower limit by the range (4k divided by 10k) which is .4. The allowed max deduction is 5500 but u r ineligible for .4 of the max bc the agi is too high, so u lose 2200 (5500 x .4) of the deduction, which leaves u 3300 (5500 – 2200) of eligible deduction

Viewing 15 replies - 676 through 690 (of 4,354 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 46’ is closed to new replies.