REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 4

Viewing 15 replies - 46 through 60 (of 4,354 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #629202
    rzrbkfaith
    Member

    No, it was not applicable to solving the problem. I think that is one of those phrases that they put into the problem to throw you off. Of course he didn't deduct it earlier, it happened in year 1. BUT it does help you really look at the wording in the question, which is so important.

    AUD - 99
    BEC - 97
    REG - 91
    FAR - 1/8/16

    #629203
    riascheme
    Member

    @kappa1032 I'm actually in the same boat as you! Debating on whether to take REG after BEC though…focusing on AUD now. 🙂

    #629204
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @rzrbkfaith

    Thanks so much I just purchased v1.1 for $15 and called it a day…should be here tomorrow 🙂 I'm starting my reg journey today and I'm taking the exam on 10/10. I have a new strategy that I'm going to implement I hope it works out for me… I'm going to read the whole book and take notes along the way. After just continue to do mcq from becker and ninja and look over the sims. So I have exactly one month to prep any advice from anyone would greatly be appreciated.

    #629205
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Should I memorize all the credits; the amounts and phase out? Please help

    #629206
    rzrbkfaith
    Member

    @Dcarter246 – I am familiarizing myself with the credits, and only memorizing the phaseouts on the items that Becker stresses specifically. According to Becker, the exam does not tend to test on specific phaseouts. They will give it to you in the problem. I have no experience with this part of the exam, so I'm not sure if that is right or not, but so far I've trusted their methods and its worked for me…

    AUD - 99
    BEC - 97
    REG - 91
    FAR - 1/8/16

    #629207
    J_gomez
    Member

    I sit for REG October 6th. I got through chapters 1 and 2 last week and am planning on working on 3 and 4 this week. I just completed 133 MCQ's on C Corporations utilizing Becker software. I'm hoping I've given myself enough time to prepare before the big day. Any suggestions for survival these next few weeks is greatly appreciated. Thanks everyone for posing and keeping me sane as well as feeling like I'm not all alone in my journey to passing this exam.

    #629208
    elvinglara
    Participant

    About to begin studying for hopefully the last time. I'm following the same plan that I did for the others, which is mostly Ninja notes and flash cards for an overview and then nonstop MCQs. I'm scheduled for Oct 18 to allow for time spent at recruiting events, and hopefully interviews :). I'd be willing to spend the $35 to move it up and hopefully get it over with earlier.

    FAR (8/17/14) - 86
    AUD (8/22/14) - 90
    BEC (8/31/14) - 86
    REG (2/29/16) - 90

    Study Materials: Ninja Notes, Flash Cards, and MCQ

    #629209
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    wondering:

    If I contribute my car: Fmv $20,000 basis $10,000 to a reg C Corp (I dont having a controlling interest in) and they give me stock worth $20,001. What is the gain to me if any?

    Answer not sure?

    I got the boot stuff I thin but what happens here? What is my basis in the stock they gave me?

    #629210
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    my mnemonic for Contributions to Corporations:

    If contribution to corp and immed after contribution the SH(s) own 80% or more of the corp, then no gain or loss recognized – If both:

    1. No boot received ( cod of liabilties is boot)

    2. contributions are not for tax avoidance reasons and contributions have biz purposes as per IRS.

    If boot received:

    Then, Gain to SH is excess of COD (liabilities cancelled by the corps assumption of liability) over their basis in the contributed property.

    Basis to Shareholder of the stock received: (Adj basis of contrib property plus gain recog less liabilities assumed

    mnemonic: B plus G less L

    Basis to Corp of property: Basis plus Gain:

    mnemonic

    B plus G

    In short:

    Basis to SH: B plus G less L

    Basis to Corp: B plus G

    Hopefully this is correct?

    #629211
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    this tax stuff sucks

    #629212
    rzrbkfaith
    Member

    Your basis is the FMV of your contribution. It is a taxable transaction to you because you did not have a controlling interest after the contribution. You would be taxed on the $20k – $10k.

    AUD - 99
    BEC - 97
    REG - 91
    FAR - 1/8/16

    #629213
    JamesBJames
    Participant

    I would say that phase out numbers are generally not important, for what it's worth. I only memorized the AMT phaseouts and the “mom and pop” phaseout for rental activity and I felt like that was enough.

    FAR: May 1st, 2014 - 91
    AUD: May 29th, 2014 - 97!
    BEC: July 16th, 2014 - 91
    REG: August 29th, 2014 - 88

    Licensed December 2015

    Feel free to add me on LinkedIn by clicking my username!

    #629214
    rzrbkfaith
    Member

    @JamesBJames – that is good to know! So far those are the only ones I have memorized! Any more suggestions are greatly appreciated!

    AUD - 99
    BEC - 97
    REG - 91
    FAR - 1/8/16

    #629215
    JamesBJames
    Participant

    Without going into too much detail about the nature of my exam, it seems like a lot of problems revolve around classification. You certainly want to know what's above the line and what's below the line. If you misclassify something — well, that's probably going to lead to an expected wrong answer.

    I really tried to memorize all the nuances with itemized deductions when I studied as well. There are a lot of little things that can slip through the cracks. Some of the problems on my exam were very detailed. It pays to know this stuff well now, anyway, because it's easy to get things confused when you start studying C and S corporations.

    FAR: May 1st, 2014 - 91
    AUD: May 29th, 2014 - 97!
    BEC: July 16th, 2014 - 91
    REG: August 29th, 2014 - 88

    Licensed December 2015

    Feel free to add me on LinkedIn by clicking my username!

    #629216
    wallybally
    Member

    Does anyone know why in Regulation 3 Simulation 3 number 2 of Becker's software does it decide to prorate the current earnings and profits based on the amount of distribution at that date and not the number of months that passed in the year?

    Here's the question:

    Alaska, Inc. is an accrual-basis C corporation that was incorporated on January 1, Year 1. At the end of Year 2, the corporation is considering converting to an S corporation. Alaska is required to determine its accumulated earnings and profits prior to conversion. The company has already calculated book net income, taxable income, and prior-year accumulated earnings and profits, and is now attempting to calculate the company’s current earnings and profits.

    In Year 4, Alaska is still a C corporation. Accumulated earnings and profits at the end of Year 3 were $61,000. Current earnings and profits for Year 4 are $24,000. During Year 4, Alaska made two distributions on the dates indicated in column A of the table below. Allocate the distributions indicated in column B among columns C, D, and E. Round all answers to the nearest dollar.

    According to Becker, the first row is:

    Date: 3/31/Y4

    Distribution amount: $58,000

    CE&P: $15,297

    AE&P: $42,703

    Excess: $0

    They got the amount under CE&P by taking the total CE&P = 24,000 and multiplying it by 58,000/91,000, or in other words, the amount of distribution at 3/31 divided by the total amount of distribution in year 4.

    The way I learned it in school is you take the CE&P = 24,000 and multiply it by 3/12 (6k), or in other words, the number of months that passed in the year at the date of distribution divided by the total number of months in one year. Then, you allocate AE&P in a FIFO way (61k-6k = 55k).

    FAR - 86 (July 2014)
    AUD - 85 (Aug 2014)
    REG - 80 (Oct 2014)
    BEC - 81 (Nov 2014)

    I'm done!!!!

Viewing 15 replies - 46 through 60 (of 4,354 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 4’ is closed to new replies.