- This topic has 4,354 replies, 165 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 2 months ago by
pia ach.
-
CreatorTopic
-
August 30, 2014 at 3:34 pm #188296
jeff
KeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
September 10, 2014 at 3:55 pm #629202
rzrbkfaith
MemberNo, it was not applicable to solving the problem. I think that is one of those phrases that they put into the problem to throw you off. Of course he didn't deduct it earlier, it happened in year 1. BUT it does help you really look at the wording in the question, which is so important.
AUD - 99
BEC - 97
REG - 91
FAR - 1/8/16September 10, 2014 at 7:26 pm #629203riascheme
Member@kappa1032 I'm actually in the same boat as you! Debating on whether to take REG after BEC though…focusing on AUD now. 🙂
September 10, 2014 at 7:41 pm #629204Anonymous
InactiveThanks so much I just purchased v1.1 for $15 and called it a day…should be here tomorrow 🙂 I'm starting my reg journey today and I'm taking the exam on 10/10. I have a new strategy that I'm going to implement I hope it works out for me… I'm going to read the whole book and take notes along the way. After just continue to do mcq from becker and ninja and look over the sims. So I have exactly one month to prep any advice from anyone would greatly be appreciated.
September 10, 2014 at 9:25 pm #629205Anonymous
InactiveShould I memorize all the credits; the amounts and phase out? Please help
September 10, 2014 at 10:05 pm #629206rzrbkfaith
Member@Dcarter246 – I am familiarizing myself with the credits, and only memorizing the phaseouts on the items that Becker stresses specifically. According to Becker, the exam does not tend to test on specific phaseouts. They will give it to you in the problem. I have no experience with this part of the exam, so I'm not sure if that is right or not, but so far I've trusted their methods and its worked for me…
AUD - 99
BEC - 97
REG - 91
FAR - 1/8/16September 10, 2014 at 11:36 pm #629207J_gomez
MemberI sit for REG October 6th. I got through chapters 1 and 2 last week and am planning on working on 3 and 4 this week. I just completed 133 MCQ's on C Corporations utilizing Becker software. I'm hoping I've given myself enough time to prepare before the big day. Any suggestions for survival these next few weeks is greatly appreciated. Thanks everyone for posing and keeping me sane as well as feeling like I'm not all alone in my journey to passing this exam.
September 11, 2014 at 1:04 am #629208elvinglara
ParticipantAbout to begin studying for hopefully the last time. I'm following the same plan that I did for the others, which is mostly Ninja notes and flash cards for an overview and then nonstop MCQs. I'm scheduled for Oct 18 to allow for time spent at recruiting events, and hopefully interviews :). I'd be willing to spend the $35 to move it up and hopefully get it over with earlier.
FAR (8/17/14) - 86
AUD (8/22/14) - 90
BEC (8/31/14) - 86
REG (2/29/16) - 90Study Materials: Ninja Notes, Flash Cards, and MCQ
September 11, 2014 at 1:38 am #629209Anonymous
Inactivewondering:
If I contribute my car: Fmv $20,000 basis $10,000 to a reg C Corp (I dont having a controlling interest in) and they give me stock worth $20,001. What is the gain to me if any?
Answer not sure?
I got the boot stuff I thin but what happens here? What is my basis in the stock they gave me?
September 11, 2014 at 2:01 am #629210Anonymous
Inactivemy mnemonic for Contributions to Corporations:
If contribution to corp and immed after contribution the SH(s) own 80% or more of the corp, then no gain or loss recognized – If both:
1. No boot received ( cod of liabilties is boot)
2. contributions are not for tax avoidance reasons and contributions have biz purposes as per IRS.
If boot received:
Then, Gain to SH is excess of COD (liabilities cancelled by the corps assumption of liability) over their basis in the contributed property.
Basis to Shareholder of the stock received: (Adj basis of contrib property plus gain recog less liabilities assumed
mnemonic: B plus G less L
Basis to Corp of property: Basis plus Gain:
mnemonic
B plus G
In short:
Basis to SH: B plus G less L
Basis to Corp: B plus G
Hopefully this is correct?
September 11, 2014 at 2:02 am #629211Anonymous
Inactivethis tax stuff sucks
September 11, 2014 at 2:28 am #629212rzrbkfaith
MemberYour basis is the FMV of your contribution. It is a taxable transaction to you because you did not have a controlling interest after the contribution. You would be taxed on the $20k – $10k.
AUD - 99
BEC - 97
REG - 91
FAR - 1/8/16September 11, 2014 at 3:32 am #629213JamesBJames
ParticipantI would say that phase out numbers are generally not important, for what it's worth. I only memorized the AMT phaseouts and the “mom and pop” phaseout for rental activity and I felt like that was enough.
FAR: May 1st, 2014 - 91
AUD: May 29th, 2014 - 97!
BEC: July 16th, 2014 - 91
REG: August 29th, 2014 - 88Licensed December 2015
Feel free to add me on LinkedIn by clicking my username!
September 11, 2014 at 3:34 am #629214rzrbkfaith
Member@JamesBJames – that is good to know! So far those are the only ones I have memorized! Any more suggestions are greatly appreciated!
AUD - 99
BEC - 97
REG - 91
FAR - 1/8/16September 11, 2014 at 3:45 am #629215JamesBJames
ParticipantWithout going into too much detail about the nature of my exam, it seems like a lot of problems revolve around classification. You certainly want to know what's above the line and what's below the line. If you misclassify something — well, that's probably going to lead to an expected wrong answer.
I really tried to memorize all the nuances with itemized deductions when I studied as well. There are a lot of little things that can slip through the cracks. Some of the problems on my exam were very detailed. It pays to know this stuff well now, anyway, because it's easy to get things confused when you start studying C and S corporations.
FAR: May 1st, 2014 - 91
AUD: May 29th, 2014 - 97!
BEC: July 16th, 2014 - 91
REG: August 29th, 2014 - 88Licensed December 2015
Feel free to add me on LinkedIn by clicking my username!
September 11, 2014 at 1:53 pm #629216wallybally
MemberDoes anyone know why in Regulation 3 Simulation 3 number 2 of Becker's software does it decide to prorate the current earnings and profits based on the amount of distribution at that date and not the number of months that passed in the year?
Here's the question:
Alaska, Inc. is an accrual-basis C corporation that was incorporated on January 1, Year 1. At the end of Year 2, the corporation is considering converting to an S corporation. Alaska is required to determine its accumulated earnings and profits prior to conversion. The company has already calculated book net income, taxable income, and prior-year accumulated earnings and profits, and is now attempting to calculate the company’s current earnings and profits.
In Year 4, Alaska is still a C corporation. Accumulated earnings and profits at the end of Year 3 were $61,000. Current earnings and profits for Year 4 are $24,000. During Year 4, Alaska made two distributions on the dates indicated in column A of the table below. Allocate the distributions indicated in column B among columns C, D, and E. Round all answers to the nearest dollar.
According to Becker, the first row is:
Date: 3/31/Y4
Distribution amount: $58,000
CE&P: $15,297
AE&P: $42,703
Excess: $0
They got the amount under CE&P by taking the total CE&P = 24,000 and multiplying it by 58,000/91,000, or in other words, the amount of distribution at 3/31 divided by the total amount of distribution in year 4.
The way I learned it in school is you take the CE&P = 24,000 and multiply it by 3/12 (6k), or in other words, the number of months that passed in the year at the date of distribution divided by the total number of months in one year. Then, you allocate AE&P in a FIFO way (61k-6k = 55k).
FAR - 86 (July 2014)
AUD - 85 (Aug 2014)
REG - 80 (Oct 2014)
BEC - 81 (Nov 2014)I'm done!!!!
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 4’ is closed to new replies.