REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 37

Viewing 15 replies - 541 through 555 (of 4,354 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #629707
    Mamabear
    Member

    Funtimes–Last time I did all Blaw first, then tax to keep tax fresh for the exam. It didn't work out for me. I felt like I ran out of time to get tax really nailed down. I think your plan of going back and forth will help break it up a bit so that you aren't completely bored out of your mind reading ALL blaw back to back. Good luck with your studies. I'm testing on 11/29. It's going to be an interesting 6 weeks!

    CPA Exam - Finally DONE (November 2014)
    BEC (08/10/13) 80
    AUD (08/24/13) 65 (11/13/13) 85
    FAR (04/12/14) 81
    REG (07/19/14) 69 (11/29/14) 87!!

    #629708
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The taxable amount to shareholders in a nonliquidating distribution of property is the extent of FMV, but not in excess of E&P. Here's an answer that confuses me:

    Reed's basis in Kent stock at January 1, Year 1 $ 500,000

    Accumulated earnings and profits at January 1, Year 1 : 125,000

    Current earnings and profits for Year 1 (from operations) 60,000

    A dividend paid in property other than money is taxable to an individual taxpayer to the extent of the property's fair market value, but not in excess of the current and accumulated earnings and profits of the distributing corporation. In this case the fair market value of the dividend is $200,000. It is taxable to the extent that Kent had current earnings ($60,000) plus accumulated earnings and profits ($125,000) plus any gain generated on the distribution itself ($50,000); thus the dividend is taxable to the extent of $200,000.

    E&P is to the extent of $185,000 – Why is the taxable amount then, $200,000?? I thought anything in excess of E&P reduces the shareholder's basis which would then be $15,000 in this case.

    Someone please help!

    #629709
    tami3492
    Participant

    cpastudent-The $185,000 would be taxable as dividend income, and the remaining $15,000 would be taxable as LT capital gain. So, although it is taxable at different rates, it is all taxable.

    FAR 7/8/14 - 88 - Becker live course
    REG 10/14/14 - 82 - Becker live course, Ninja notes and audio
    BEC 11/25/14 - 88 - Becker live course, Ninja audio, Wiley book for extra questions
    AUD 2/3/15 - 94 - Becker self study, Ninja audio, Wiley book for extra questions

    #629710
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @cpastudent22 it seems like you are leaving out some important information concerning the question from your post but i believe this will help you with the solution:

    When a Corporation distributes appreciated property, it recognizes a gain= FMVsellingprice-ADJUSTEDBASISprop. You didnt provide it in your post but i am assuming that the Corporation sold this propery for $50,000 more than its basis generating a 50,000 gain.

    ****When a corpoartion recognizes a gain on appreciated distributions it INCREASE EARNINGS AND PROFIT. That means that the current E&P of $185,000 is increased by $50,000. This increase put the Earnings and Profit at $235,000 meaning the whole $200,000 dividend is taxable!

    Hope this helps 🙂

    #629711
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @tami3492 …. in this case it would not be taxable as an LT Cap Gain since the shareholder has basis remaining in the corporation… if you guys are studying using Becker, make sure to check out the Pass Key on R3-44 it will help clarify this!

    #629712
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Anyone understand why Section 179 $25k reduction as taken into account when it's fully phased out at costs of $225+??

    Problem (NINJA 925)

    A taxpayer purchased and placed in service during the year a $761,000 piece of equipment. The equipment is 7-year property. The first-year depreciation for 7-year property is 14.29%. There is an allowable Section 179 limit in 2014 of $25,000. What amount is the maximum allowable depreciation without using bonus depreciation?

    Answer:C. $130,174

    A taxpayer who elects to expense under Section 179 must reduce the depreciable basis of the Section 179 property by the amount of the Section 179 expense deduction. The maximum allowable depreciation is calculated as follows:

    Basis of property $761,000

    Less: Section 179 expense (25,000)


    Adjusted basis $736,000

    1st-year MACRS rate x 14.29%


    1st-year depreciation $105,174

    Section 179 expense 25,000


    Maximum allowable depreciation $130,174

    =========

    BUT THE TEXT REFERENCE SAYS: The ceiling amount of $25,000 for 2014 is reduced dollar-for-dollar for personal property acquisitions in excess of $200,000 (i.e., if more than $200,000 of property is placed in service during a tax year, no Section 179 deduction is allowed).

    Hope someone sees what I am missing?

    #629713
    funtimesNOT
    Member

    @mama – Don't remind me it is only six week!!! Good luck to you!!!! I scheduled mine NOV 30, I really hope it does not snow that day, as it is the last of the window!!

    AUDIT - 79
    FAR - 64, 77
    BEC - 69, 71,79 - DONE!
    REG - 60, 75

    Nothing in the 80s ; however, I worked full time the whole time! (like 10 hour days) so it can be done 🙂

    #629714
    Mary 2496
    Member

    @ Cricket – we talked about this the other week when someone else posted the same issue. From what I remember, the best answer that we could come up with is that there is an error in whatever exam prep/test material that question is from. You're right – it wouldn't even be allowed to begin with, due to the limitations.

    #629715
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Mama – We sat for FAR in the same window and now we scheduled for REG for the same date. Started studying last night. This will be an interesting ride!

    #629716
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Question… REG is my last exam and I am struggling to get my head in the game. I feel like I'm just staring into an abyss when I pop open my software. I thought I'd be crazy motivated for this exam seeing as its my last one, but its not working for me. I am supposed to take the exam 11/18… assuming I can get myself in gear, do you think 4.5 weeks is enough time for REG?

    #629717
    Tax lady
    Participant

    @Elle. How much are you studying per day?

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired 🙁
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

    #629718
    WANNABE_CPA
    Member

    Hey guys..i am thinking we should start posting random questions constantly ones we get wrong or confuse us to help others understand, revise or help us understanding them. Motivate each other along the way, keep updating about what you studying, how are you studying and see everyone pass on the result day. I had an amazing group for FAR 2nd window, we did unending questions together, was great help actually, i think that really helped me stay focused.

    Is anyone with me in this? If yes post when are you taking REG next and lets begin posting and answering problems for each other.

    Wannabe_CPA : Testing 11/26 (Postponed from 11/12)

    FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God 🙂
    BEC : 78 (8/27) 🙂
    REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) 🙂
    AUD : 69,67, 07/23

    #629719
    Tax lady
    Participant

    I'm in…testing 11/13. This is a re-take for me.

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired 🙁
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

    #629720
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Tax Lady – I just started getting back to studying. Trying to do about 3 hours a day M-F and then 6 hours on Saturday and Sunday. I think I might have to bump it up though to make it through the material with enough time to review….

    #629721
    Tax lady
    Participant

    @Elle…I agree with you. It's a lot of material and I didn't give myself enough review time initially which is very important.

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired 🙁
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

Viewing 15 replies - 541 through 555 (of 4,354 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 37’ is closed to new replies.