REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 36

Viewing 15 replies - 526 through 540 (of 4,354 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #629692
    Mary 2496
    Member

    I would know the thresholds and percentages on the main ones, and any applicable limitations. I wouldn't spend countless hours on that, but I would have a good understanding of them, IMO.

    #629693
    Amay
    Member

    Thank you guys for the support. @Amor getting a room sounds like a great idea! I think I would consider it if I had to drive longer, but the commute is really around 50 minutes (directions say 54). I normally drive 45 minutes to an hour to get to work though, so I am used to being that long in my car. If anything, I think the drive will be good for me because I can play some music and relax on a traffic-free commute 🙂

    BEC: 73, 81
    AUD: 85
    FAR: 71, 77
    REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀

    *This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂

    #629694
    funtimesNOT
    Member

    I have just started to study for REG! and OMG this stuff is JAMMED PACKED with rules and exceptions to rules.

    I was thinking of going back and forth from the TAX section to the B-Law Section. instead of first B-LAW and then Tax. Has anybody tried this approach? I am using CPA excel – and the guy who lectures during the tax course is GREAT! reminds me of the lady from FAR they speak ENGLISH!!! and that is amazing it makes all the difference. Man I am taking my exam NOV 30, and I have no clue this information seems a little dense! any ideas on methods of study?

    AUDIT - 79
    FAR - 64, 77
    BEC - 69, 71,79 - DONE!
    REG - 60, 75

    Nothing in the 80s ; however, I worked full time the whole time! (like 10 hour days) so it can be done 🙂

    #629695
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can someone please help me understand this problem?

    Vex Corp. executed a negotiable promissory note payable to Tamp, Inc. The note was collateralized by some of Vex's business assets. Tamp negotiated the note to Miller for value. Miller endorsed the note in blank and negotiated it to Bilco for value. Before the note became due, Bilco agreed to release Vex's collateral. Vex refused to pay Bilco when the note became due. Bilco promptly notified Miller and Tamp of Vex's default. Which of the following statements is correct?

    a.Bilco will be unable to collect from either Tamp or Miller because of Bilco's release of the collateral.

    b.Bilco will be unable to collect from Miller because Miller's endorsement was in blank.

    c.Bilco will be able to collect from Tamp because Tamp was the original payee.

    d.Bilco will be able to collect from either Tamp or Miller because Bilco was a holder in due course.

    Choice “a” is correct. When a person entitled to enforce an instrument impairs the value of collateral securing the instrument, the obligations of the endorsers are discharged to the extent of the impairment. The security was completely released so the endorsers will be released from their obligation (assuming the note was fully collateralized). UCC 3-606

    #629696
    Mary 2496
    Member

    I hate the night before!! Ugh – REG in the morning. I missed it last time by two points. I really need to be done with this exam.

    #629697
    tami3492
    Participant

    Good Luck tomorrow Mary!

    FAR 7/8/14 - 88 - Becker live course
    REG 10/14/14 - 82 - Becker live course, Ninja notes and audio
    BEC 11/25/14 - 88 - Becker live course, Ninja audio, Wiley book for extra questions
    AUD 2/3/15 - 94 - Becker self study, Ninja audio, Wiley book for extra questions

    #629698
    Mary 2496
    Member

    Thanks Tami!

    #629699
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    This holder in due course crap is making my head spin. Totally lost here.

    #629700
    tami3492
    Participant

    CPAHopeful, I know what you mean. I just can't wrap my head around it. It gets especially confusing when there are multiple parties involved. I understand the basics, but not much beyond that. My test is on Tuesday, so I've just given in that this will be one of those topics I don't fully understand and hope that I don't get many questions on it.

    FAR 7/8/14 - 88 - Becker live course
    REG 10/14/14 - 82 - Becker live course, Ninja notes and audio
    BEC 11/25/14 - 88 - Becker live course, Ninja audio, Wiley book for extra questions
    AUD 2/3/15 - 94 - Becker self study, Ninja audio, Wiley book for extra questions

    #629701
    Amay
    Member

    @Mary you got this girl!

    BEC: 73, 81
    AUD: 85
    FAR: 71, 77
    REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀

    *This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂

    #629702
    Mary 2496
    Member

    Thanks Amay. @ Tami – you should be fine. 😉

    (This is my second REG attempt.)

    #629703
    SomedayCPA2015
    Participant

    CPAhopeful, and Tami same here! Glad to see it's not only me spinning with the HDC stuff.

    REG - Passed
    BEC - Passed
    AUD - Passed
    FAR - Passed!!!! I have my life back.

    #629704
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ugh, tomorrow's test day. I have this horrible feeling of both guilt for not studying enough/efficiently, and sense of waste that after weeks of hell I might throw it all away tomorrow…

    #629705
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I presumed that the phrase “plus cash of $50,000” means boot PAID.

    I was wrong, it means boot RECEIVED.

    Big difference!

    This was the same issue I had with nonmonetary exchange transactions with FAR.

    How do we catch simple misunderstanding of this kind of scenario?

    CPA-01747

    In Year 9, Joan Reed exchanged commercial real estate that she owned for other commercial real estate plus cash of $50,000. The following additional information pertains to this transaction:

    Property given up by Reed

    Fair value $ 500,000

    Adjusted basis $300,000

    Property received by Reed

    Fair value $450,000

    What amount of gain should be recognized in Reed's Year 9 income tax return?

    a. $200,000

    b. $100,000

    c. $50,000

    d. $0

    Explanation

    Choice “c” is correct. $50,000 is Reed's recognized gain in Year 9.

    Rule: Gain is only recognized on an exchange of “like-kind” property for the lesser of the amount of “gain realized” or the amount of “boot” received in the exchange.

    Fair value of property received >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $450,000

    Amount of cash (“boot”) received>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50,000

    Total amount realized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 500,000

    Basis of property given up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (300,000)

    Gain realized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>$ 200,000

    Gain recognized* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ 50,000

    * Gain recognized is the lesser of the amount of “gain realized” or amount of the “boot” received.

    Choices “a”, “b”, and “d” are incorrect, per the above rule

    #629706
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    FIRST BUMP!

    Question:

    How much exclusion can the surviving spouse use?

    Situation:

    Adam and Eve got married in January 2010.

    They bought a house the same month and lived there together.

    Adam died in February 2011.

    Eve sold the house in December 2011.

Viewing 15 replies - 526 through 540 (of 4,354 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 36’ is closed to new replies.