REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 286

Viewing 15 replies - 4,276 through 4,290 (of 4,354 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #633492
    REGTaker
    Member

    C–tendered, you sneaky devil

    #633493
    REGTaker
    Member

    Do you need help with AMT?

    #633494
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Do you? I can try and copy/paste my SIM.

    #633495
    REGTaker
    Member

    Sure. If you want to go over it. I haven't looked at AMT recently.

    #633496
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    This is a drop-down SIM. Let me know if it's confusing.

    Selections:

    I. Increases Reliant's 2013 AMTI.

    D. Decreases Reliant's 2013 AMTI.

    N. Has no effect on Reliant's 2013 AMTI.

    1. Reliant used the 70% dividends received deduction for regular tax purposes.

    2. Reliant received interest from a state's general obligation bonds.

    3. Reliant used MACRS depreciation on seven-year personal property placed into service January 3, 2013, for regular tax purposes. No expense election was made, and Reliant elected not to use bonus depreciation.

    4. Depreciation on nonresidential real property placed into service on January 3, 2013, was under the general MACRS depreciation system for regular tax purposes.

    5. Reliant had only cash charitable contributions for 2013.

    #633497
    REGTaker
    Member

    I don't know if this is right, but I don't think DRD, Bond interest or Macrs for real property is allowed for AMT so 1 would increase 2 would decrease and 4 would increase

    3 would have no effect

    5…would have no effect??

    #633498
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Here's the answer:

    1. (N) The dividends received deduction is not an adjustment in computing AMTI before the ACE adjustment. However, note that the 70% dividends received deduction is an increase adjustment in computing a corporation's ACE.

    2. (N) The tax-exempt interest on a state's general obligation bonds is not an adjustment is computing AMTI before the ACE adjustment.

    3. (I) Generally for seven-year property, the 200% declining balance method would be used under MACRS for regular tax purposes, while the 150% declining balance method must be used for AMT purposes, resulting in an increase adjustment in computing AMTI prior to the ACE adjustment for the year placed in service.

    4. (N) For real property placed in service after December 31, 1998, the AMT adjustment has been eliminated because for AMT purposes, the recovery period is the same as that used for regular tax MACRS depreciation (e.g., 39 years or 27 1/2 years). On the other hand, for real property that was placed in service before January 1, 1999, an AMT adjustment is necessary because for AMT purposes, real property must be depreciated using the straight-line method over a 40-year recovery period, rather than the 39-year or 27 1/2-year period used for regular tax purposes.

    5. (N) Allowable charitable contributions do not result in an adjustment in computing AMTI or ACE.

    #633499
    REGTaker
    Member

    I got one right!! Now for the other 4…

    #633500
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I only got 2 right on that one!

    #633501
    REGTaker
    Member

    I need to step away for a few minutes. I will be back

    #633502
    REGTaker
    Member

    I am back.

    #633503
    REGTaker
    Member

    Clearly we need to work on the preferences/adjustments for AMT.

    #633504
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Corp or Individual or Both?

    #633505
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Rona Corp.'s 2014 alternative minimum taxable income was $200,000.

    The exempt portion of Rona's 2014 alternative minimum taxable income was

    A. $0

    B. $12,500

    C. $27,500

    D. $52,500

    #633506
    REGTaker
    Member

    I still don't understand ACE versus preACE versus AMTI. 🙁

Viewing 15 replies - 4,276 through 4,290 (of 4,354 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 286’ is closed to new replies.