REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 270

Viewing 15 replies - 4,036 through 4,050 (of 4,354 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #633251
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Brisk Corp. is an accrual-basis, calendar-year C corporation with one individual shareholder. At year end, Brisk had $600,000 accumulated and current earnings and profits as it prepared to make its only dividend distribution for the year to its shareholder. Brisk could distribute either cash of $200,000 or land with an adjusted tax basis of $75,000 and a fair market value of $200,000. How would the taxable incomes of both Brisk and the shareholder change if land were distributed instead of cash?

    Brisk's taxable income Shareholder's taxable income

    No change No change

    Increase No change

    No change Decrease

    Increase Decrease

    #633252
    REGTaker
    Member

    Whew. I am notorious for overthinking these problems.

    #633253
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    That showed up weird! Let me know if you need me to post the question better.

    #633254
    REGTaker
    Member

    4-C?

    #633255
    CPAfit
    Participant

    @bucky 4- B Increase , No change

    #633256
    jimmymac814
    Participant

    I know we are beating this one to the ground. But I just want to make sure I am following the logic, sorry to back track so much, i was working on sims and didnt refresh for a while. But 1 is D-1,000 because taxable income is calculated before any special deductions (ex- DRD). therefore all of the dividends rec'd (1,000) are going to be included in TI?

    #633257
    terryharm
    Member

    Brick would increase Shareholder no increase

    BEC: 81
    FAR: 75
    AUD: 81
    REG: 85

    PA license Pending..

    #633258
    CPAfit
    Participant

    @jimmy yes, from the above explanation given by @regtaker that's what I've understood

    #633259
    REGTaker
    Member

    I thought corporation would treat it as a distribution at FMV so 200=200, no change. Am I wrong about this?

    #633260
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It's B (Bisk Increase/Shareholder no change) – If Brisk distributes $200,000 cash the shareholder will have $200,000 of dividend income (since sufficient earnings and profits exist). It the land is distributed, the amount of the distribution is the land's fair market value of $200,000 so the shareholder would still have $200,000 of dividend income. Thus, there is no change for the shareholder's taxable income.

    If Brisk distributes appreciated property as a dividend, it must recognize the appreciation in the property as income ($200,000 – $75,000 = $125,000). Therefore, Brisk would have higher taxable income if the land was distributed in comparison to the cash.

    #633261
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The corp has to take a gain on the change in FMV – the distribution is looked at like a sale.

    #633262
    terryharm
    Member

    I have a question about the M1 reconciliation and executive compensation. If the Presidents salary was $1.5m, is that an adjustment and reconciling item between income and taxable income on the M1

    BEC: 81
    FAR: 75
    AUD: 81
    REG: 85

    PA license Pending..

    #633263
    REGTaker
    Member

    Dang it! I got them confused again.

    #633264
    jimmymac814
    Participant

    @zubairs, thank you!

    #633265
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @terryharm – I'm not sure how to answer that – isn't executive compensation the same book and tax?

Viewing 15 replies - 4,036 through 4,050 (of 4,354 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 270’ is closed to new replies.