REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 204

Viewing 15 replies - 3,046 through 3,060 (of 4,354 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #632243
    taxman89
    Participant

    thanks!! i feel like a majority of the ninja MCQs on tax are focused on the phaseouts

    Aud-75 3x I knew i never liked you
    Bec-77 1x being in the bubble is stressful
    Reg-82 4x its not me its you...and no we cant be friends
    Far-78 1x easiest section

    #632244
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Tax Lady – I hope you get your scores today too!

    #632245
    Tax lady
    Participant

    Me too girl! I'm sooooo ready to know.

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired 🙁
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

    #632246
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    That's good to hear because there are so many phaseouts to remember. I'm guessing we should know at least the AMT phaseout along with the gift tax one?

    #632247
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    For corporations if cash+property combine over 80% it is tax free, but for partnerships it is tax free regardless of the percentage, correct?

    #632248
    Tax lady
    Participant

    For contributions..yes. Unless the p-ship relieves liability from a partner that exceeds his basis then it creates a gain to the partner.

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired 🙁
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

    #632249
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks, how should I study the simulations?

    #632250
    win2bet
    Participant

    In which of the following types of action, brought against a CPA who issues an audit report containing an unqualified opinion on materially misstated financial statements, may a plaintiff prevail without proving reliance on the audit report?

    A. An action for common law fraud

    B. An action for common law breach of contract

    C. An action brought under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933

    D. An action brought under Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

    Confused why answer isnt A as well, i thought with common law fraud you dont need to prove reliance.

    The answer is C – A plaintiff does not have to prove reliance on materially misstated financial statements under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.

    REG 68,87
    BEC 85
    FAR 75
    AUD 64,64, 86!

    #632251

    1934 added the reliance aspect. The question doesn't say anything about fraud or breach. The unqualified opinion may have been performed according to standards, just didn't detect the misstatement.

    A 88, B 76, F 84, R 76 Passed 2014

    Licensed in OK

    #632252
    MommyBear
    Member

    I have that common law fraud has to have “reasonable reliance” so basically any third party that you know will rely on the material or can foresee relying on the material. For Section 11 of the 1933 act you just have to prove that a material misstatement occurred & damages were incurred. You DON'T have to prove negligence or reliance.

    #632253
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    MommaBear, when are you taking your test? You seem on top of everything which is good to see.

    I'm taking mine on the 30th and will use majority of the time on the tax sections. Maybe two or so days on Business Law/Ethics.

    #632254
    MommyBear
    Member

    My test is on the 29th. I verify my notes sometimes before I post because I don't want to confuse anyone by posting incorrect information so I don't KNOW everything I post for 100% certainty until I look it up. You and I are probably chugging along at the same pace. I haven't done too much with blaw this time around and I'm not sure how I'm going to approach that section seriously. I think reviewing flashcards and notes is a better use of my time than doing hundreds of MCQs on it. What are you doing for blaw/ethics?

    #632255
    MommyBear
    Member

    I slept a little this morning and went into work late. I am refreshed and will be quizzing tonight if anyone wants to join in. Hopefully covering all topics to jump start my final review week. I should be on by 6:30 EST.

    #632256
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    For BLaw I'm going to read those sections again and do most of the MCQs on Ninja. Not all as there is I believe over 700 BLaw questions. I took good notes on them but I feel like I will have to read the sections again to fully feel comfortable.

    These tax rates for capital gains continue to confuse me. Have you figured them out yet?

    #632257
    Tax lady
    Participant

    Hey guys. I'll be on a little later. Taking my son to a school dance and then a quick dinner with my hubby but it won't be real late. Maybe like 7:30? See you guys in a bit!

    REG 8/15/14 (73); 11/13/14 (82)-expired 🙁
    AUD 5/30/15 (80)
    BEC 11/28/15 (75)
    FAR 7/30/16

    Studying with CPAexcel and Ninja notes/MCQ's/Flashcards

Viewing 15 replies - 3,046 through 3,060 (of 4,354 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 204’ is closed to new replies.