REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 76

Viewing 15 replies - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 1,691 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #768168
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Claudia, you aren't including the DRD. If you look at the problem, it states “Not including 2000 in dividends received” so you have to add those dividends back to be included in the base income. This 2000 is the full dividend prior to the DRD. Hence, this will not include the DRD because it has not been taken yet.

    Since the 2000 is from non-affiliated organization, the DRD would be 70%. Therefore, if we actually included the DRD we would only add back 30% of the 2000 or 600. But we add back the entire 2000. 2000 is before the 1400 DRD.

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #768169
    Claudia408
    Participant

    Just3 – ok so i guess i'm interpreting the question wrong. i basically want gross income?

    also what is it about the question that is tricky? or is it? seemed straight forward income and expense items…

    At the beginning of the year, Cable, a C corporation, had accumulated earnings and profits of $100,000. Cable reported the following items on its current year tax return:
    Taxable income $50,000
    Federal income taxes paid 5,000
    Current year charitable contributions in excess of 10% limitation 1,000
    Net capital loss for current year 2,000
    What is Cable's accumulated earnings and profits at the end of the year?

    Answer $142,000

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #768170
    csvirk
    Participant

    On February 1, Burns contracted in writing with Nagel to sell Nagel a used car. The contract provided that Burns was to deliver the car on February 15 and Nagel was to pay the $800 purchase price not later than March 15. On February 21, Burns assigned the contract to Ross for $600. Nagel was not notified of the assignment. Which of the following statements is correct?

    Incorrect A.
    By making the assignment, Burns impliedly warranted Nagel would pay the full purchase price.

    B.
    The assignment to Ross is invalid because Nagel was not notified.

    C.
    Ross will not be subject to any contract defenses Nagel could have raised against Burns.

    D.
    By making the assignment, Burns impliedly warranted a lack of knowledge of any fact impairing the value of the assignment.

    Why D is correct answer.

    Explanation is very confusing: “By making the assignment, Burns impliedly warranted a lack of knowledge of any fact impairing the value of the assignment. The lack of notification of the assignment has no bearing on its validity. Generally, an assignor will give notification, but it is not required. Assigning a contract does not relieve the assignor (party making the assignment) of the liability for fulfilling the contract.”

    FAR: 71, 77!
    AUD: 69, 80
    BEC: 72
    REG: 84

    #768171
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Claudia, I thought that question was going to be tricky as well when I first looked at it. However, it's just asking for accumulated earning and profits which is just how it sounds. Accumulated profit. Add all income regardless of tax consequences and subtract all expenses and payments regardless of tax consequences.

    Accumulated earnings and profits is necessary to determine the type of corporate distributions. That is where the tax stuff comes in. But anyways, you got it 🙂

    csvirk, I have absolutely no idea. I got that question wrong too and never found out the answer. Anybody want to chime in and give us an answer in English?

    My turn for another question:

    Why is the correct answer not C? Correct answer is D. A personal car is definitely a capital asset and he definitely sold it for a $5,000 loss (doesn't show depreciation of any kind which is confusing but I ignored that). So, $3,000 should be deductible in the current year… Help!

    Tom Lewis, an individual taxpayer, sold his personal automobile (never used for business purposes) for $5,000 in the current year. He purchased the automobile five years earlier for $10,000. Which of the following is the correct treatment of this transaction on Tom's current-year tax return (assuming that Tom's only other source of income was from wages)?

    A.
    Include $5,000 as miscellaneous income on his tax return.

    B.
    Deduct a $5,000 long-term capital loss on his tax return.

    Incorrect C.
    Deduct a $3,000 long-term capital loss on his current-year tax return, and carry over the remaining $2,000 to the next year.

    D.
    Show neither income nor loss from this transaction on his tax return.

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #768172
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Just3 because it was just a car– nothing more- when you go to sell your car tomorrow you won't take a gain or loss on it… it wasn't used for business so its not a business expense meaning he hasn't been taking depreciation on it. Remember a capital asset is property held by the taxpayer for business. He just owned a car…. if we could write off our cars I have a 2001 mazda sitting out front that is just begging to be sold for a loss 🙂

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #768173
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    mckan… a capital asset is a personal asset. A business used asset is 1231…

    From the IRS Website, “Almost everything you own and use for personal or investment purposes is a capital asset. Examples include a home, personal-use items like household furnishings, and stocks or bonds held as investments. When you sell a capital asset, the difference between the adjusted basis in the asset and the amount you realized from the sale is a capital gain or a capital loss.”

    https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc409.html

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #768174
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    *sigh*

    3 sets of 100 MCQ today, first set: 78%, second set: 87%!, third set: 80%. Trending score at 74 🙁

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #768175
    Bear-Bear
    Participant

    How far along are you in adaptive learning?

    Three sets of 100??? Freakin' ouch!

    #768176
    Claudia408
    Participant

    Just3 – are you using only ninja mcq including all topics? I think your trending well plsu u have plenty of time to improve. And wow 300 mcqs! Amazing! I can't focus long enough to get more than maybe 120-160 in a day depending on the topics.

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #768177
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    except for a few exceptions with time constraints I've always done sets of 100. Most people including my family think I'm crazy but it really prepares me for the marathon long tests!

    I've attempted 1264 questions. Trending 74.33, Average 76%. I've also done the tax questions in WTB and Becker. Lots of work but all worth it. I need to work on improving my trending score. I went in to FAR trending at 79% with 1880 attempts so I'm not too far off I hope.

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #768178
    Claudia408
    Participant

    Your average and trending is almost the same. I feel though average is a Better indicator bc trending includes questions you've seen. Average over 70ish and you will most likely pass!

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #768179
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Trending includes questions you've seen an average doesn't? I had no idea haha

    Thanks for the motivation Claudia 🙂

    If Jon Snow can take back the north from Ramsay Bolton, I can at least pass the CPA Exam!

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #768180
    Claudia408
    Participant

    Spoiler alert! I just started watching game of thrones, half way through season 2! Lol. I'm into the show but lit ain't no breaking bad!

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #768181
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Just3, how many weeks have you been studying for REG? You are already done with becker? Impressive. Best of luck to you! You motivate me to study harder 🙂 I was gonna call it a night. Only did around 40 problems today LOL

    Y'all need to watch DareDevil. I binged watch to 4am last weekend. Super GOOD

    BEC- PASS

    #768182
    Claudia408
    Participant

    Spartans- have u scheduled Reg yet? I'm considering taking it in 3 weeks bc it's my 3rd attempt… Plus I want to squeeze study time in for FAR in early September… but at that point Reg study retake is probably only get 60-70 hours study time. Total time would probably be 240 though. Ugh hate this test soooo much!!

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

Viewing 15 replies - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 1,691 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 76’ is closed to new replies.