REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 61

Viewing 15 replies - 901 through 915 (of 1,691 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #767943
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Per the IRS: https://www.irs.gov/publications/p527/ch03.html

    Maximum special allowance. The maximum special allowance is:

    $25,000 for single individuals and married individuals filing a joint return for the tax year,

    $12,500 for married individuals who file separate returns for the tax year and lived apart from their spouses at all times during the tax year, and

    $25,000 for a qualifying estate reduced by the special allowance for which the surviving spouse qualified.

    If your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is $100,000 or less ($50,000 or less if married filing separately), you can deduct your loss up to the amount specified above. If your MAGI is more than $100,000 (more than $50,000 if married filing separately), your special allowance is limited to 50% of the difference between $150,000 ($75,000 if married filing separately) and your MAGI.

    Generally, if your MAGI is $150,000 or more ($75,000 or more if you are married filing separately), there is no special allowance.

    Based the preceding explanation, Lane's MAGI of $165K is over the threshold of $150K. So wouldn't you just net the 35K of passive loss against the passive income of $15K ? Lane would be able to offset $15K of the passive loss.

    #767944
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    if you treat them separately then you would up with 0 loss being allowed from the rental activity.

    I saw this question and thought the explanation was confusing. Maybe I need to go back and compare Roger's explanation to the Ninja notes – but, Roger explains the loss from active rental property as you can deduct up to $25,000 if the AGI doesn't exceed $100,000. Once it's over $100,000 then you have to reduce the $25,000 by 0.50 for every dollar over. So in this case, the AGI would be:

    160,000
    15,000 S Corp income
    -15,000 rental activity
    160,000 = AGI, right? or am i doing this all wrong?

    so then 160,000-100,000 = 60,000 x .5 = 30,000
    25,000 – 30,000 = no additional deduction for active rental activity. so you would only get to deduct the 15,000 that you had other passive activity income to offset (The 15,000 of s corp income). So the only way you can deduct the 15,000 is by combining the rental and s corp activity – if you didn't combine them then the entire rental activity loss would be deferred.

    I guess the ninja calculation is going through steps 2 – 4 to figure out if any of the $20,000 loss can be deducted.

    but why does step 2 calculate MAGI…didn't the question already say the MAGI was 165,000 – right?

    Again, i find the ninja explanation really confusing and I seem to get to the right place using Roger's process so i guess i'll stick with that. I suppose there are a variety of ways to get to the same answer, you just need to figure out which one makes the most sense to you.

    #767945
    csvirk
    Participant

    @allaboard & @Villan Thank you guys. Here is another one.

    Mike and Jane Lewis, a married couple, file a joint 2015 federal income tax return. They have one child, age 15, whom they support 100%. Both are under age 65. They have the following income and expenses for the year:

    Mike's wages $50,000
    Jane's wages 40,000
    Total allowable itemized deductions 12,000
    Mike's contribution to an IRA 4,000
    Jane's contribution to an IRA 4,000

    Mike is not covered by a pension plan at work, while Jane is covered by a plan at her employer.

    The exemption amount (per exemption) for 2015 is $4,000. The standard deduction amount for married filing jointly is $12,600.

    What is the Lewises' total exemption amount for 2015?

    A.
    $4,000

    B.
    $4,050

    Incorrect C.
    $12,600

    D.
    $12,000

    Explanation:

    The Lewises have a total of three exemptions: one for Mike, one for Jane, and one for their dependent child.

    Thus, their total exemption amount is $4,000 × 3 = $12,000.

    Why C is incorrect?

    FAR: 71, 77!
    AUD: 69, 80
    BEC: 72
    REG: 84

    #767946
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    because it's asking for exemption amount. 12,600 is the standard deduction amount. it's obviously presented in a way to confuse people.

    #767947
    csvirk
    Participant

    Mike and Jane Lewis, a married couple, file a joint 2015 federal income tax return. They have one child, age 15, whom they support 100%. Both are under age 65. They have the following income and expenses for the year:

    Mike's wages $65,000
    Jane's wages 60,000
    Total allowable itemized deductions 13,000
    Mike's contribution to an IRA 4,000
    Jane's contribution to an IRA 4,000

    Mike is not covered by a pension plan at work, while Jane is covered by a plan at her employer.

    The exemption amount (per exemption) for 2015 is $4,000. The standard deduction amount for married filing jointly is $12,600.

    What is the Lewises' taxable income amount for 2015?

    A.
    $92,000

    B.
    $96,000

    C.
    $96,400

    Incorrect D.
    $100,000

    Explanation :

    The Lewises' taxable income amount is calculated as follows:

    Mike's wages $ 65,000
    Jane's wages 60,000
    Mike's contribution to an IRA (4,000)
    ———
    Adjusted gross income $121,000
    Less Itemized deductions (13,000)
    Less Exemption amount (12,000)
    ———
    Taxable income $ 96,000

    Note

    The Lewises could not deduct their standard deduction amount since they itemized their deductions. Taxpayers cannot take the standard deduction amount if they itemize their deductions. Taxpayers can elect each year to itemize deductions or take the standard deduction.

    Since only Jane is covered by a pension plan at work, Mike may take an IRA deduction in 2015 because they are below the threshold in AGI. Jane's IRA contribution is not deductible since they are above the threshold of $118,000 in AGI and she is covered by a pension plan at work.

    I thought Both of 4000 IRA contribution were subject to Phaseout since thier AGI is 125K (above threshold of 118). Thank you guys for your help.

    FAR: 71, 77!
    AUD: 69, 80
    BEC: 72
    REG: 84

    #767948
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    damnit mike and jane, get the F out of here!

    i wrote this down in my notes when going through roger:

    If one spouse is covered by a plan, then contributions for the non-participating spouse cannot be deducted if AGI exceeds 193,000. In other words, if one spouse is covered by a plan then the AGI limitation changes for the non-participating spouse.

    All these stupid limitations are going to mess me up.

    #767949
    csvirk
    Participant

    @allaboard. Thank you. Gotta make those notes.

    FAR: 71, 77!
    AUD: 69, 80
    BEC: 72
    REG: 84

    #767950
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Hey guys,

    So I know the answer to this question is C, but I just don't understand what happens to the other $10,000 of realized gain from the subsequent sale that is not part of the built-in gains tax?

    Magic Corp., a regular C corporation, elected S corporation status at the beginning of the current calendar year. It had an asset with a basis of $40,000 and a fair market value (FMV) of $85,000 on January 1. The asset was sold during the year for $95,000. Magic’s corporate tax rate was 35%. What was Magic’s tax liability as a result of the sale?

    A. $0
    B. $ 3,500
    C. $15,750
    D, $19,250

    Thanks for the help!

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #767951
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ready for this?

    Per the IRS “Note. If you were married and both you and your spouse contributed to IRAs, figure your deduction and your spouse's deduction separately.”

    Use Worksheet 1-2. Figuring Your Reduced IRA Deduction for 2015

    https://www.irs.gov/publications/p590a/ch01.html#en_US_2015_publink1000230381

    Jane does not get the IRA deduction because she's covered at work and MAGI exceeds 118K

    Mike gets the IRA deduction because he's not covered at work and MAGI is less than 183K

    The key to the problem to calculate the deduction on each spouse separately

    #767952
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @just3letters it flows through to the members so they can determine their treatment of it.

    #767953
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Just3, when you have built in gains and sell an asset, you take the lower of the appreciated amount or the gain on disposition. In this case the appreciation is 45,000 x .35 gives you 15,750 tax liability

    #767954
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Thanks everyone!

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #767955
    theunexperienced
    Participant

    Hey guys. I'm taking my test this Friday and I'm having a mild to moderate panic attack…Even though I'm doing great with NINJA MCQ (76avg, 95trending) I feel like I'm still brain dead on certain things. Any advice on this “hell week”?

    FAR - 75 (2/25/16)
    AUD - 80 (4/8/16)
    REG - 80 (6/10/16)
    BEC - 79 (7/19/16)

    You only get one shot with the spirit bomb.

    #767956
    Credit Revenue
    Participant

    That's about where I was… I think 78 avg 92 trending. I made an 83. I would read or look at areas that aren't sinking in. Besides that just keep reviewing MCQs. Spend a day on SIMs. Sounds like you are in good shape. Take most of Thursday off… So you are fresh on Friday.

    A - 79 expires 4/30/16 need a pass on REG
    B - 78
    F - 80
    R - 83!!! Can live again!

    #767957
    theunexperienced
    Participant

    @Credit Thanks! Just those few sentences helped me walk away from the ledge lol. I did plan on mashing out 6hr days from tuesday through thursday, but I guess I should cut it short the day before the test huh?

    FAR - 75 (2/25/16)
    AUD - 80 (4/8/16)
    REG - 80 (6/10/16)
    BEC - 79 (7/19/16)

    You only get one shot with the spirit bomb.

Viewing 15 replies - 901 through 915 (of 1,691 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 61’ is closed to new replies.