REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 55

Viewing 15 replies - 811 through 825 (of 1,691 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #767853
    Claudia408
    Participant

    mckan – good luck tmrw, then enjoy the long weekend!

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #767854
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Ugh Thanks Cluadia! I feel like I am having FAR flashbacks as I seem to be getting stupider– but am remaining hopeful that my scores are falling because I've been hammering the questions Ive been getting wrong all day… fingers crossed please that I remember enough to get a pass!!!!! Will check in tomorrow and let everyone know how it goes… and yes!!! I CAN. NOT. WAIT!!! for a long weekend of NOT looking at CPA stuff!!!!!!

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767855
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Mckan good luck tomorrow! You got this!

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #767856
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Thanks Just3! and GOOD LUCK Ano!!! we CAN do this!!

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767857
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @mckan514w
    good luck to you too !!!!!!!!!!!!!

    #767858
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    I'm just finishing up R3 on C-Corps. This material has absolutely exhausted me. Anybody else feel frustrated with all the minutia of this topic?

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #767859
    c1oth
    Participant

    Can anyone please explain the second part of this answer? I thought the corporation received land of 40,000 + 20,000 = 60,000 why is the FMV of 70,000 used?

    In April, A and B formed X Corp. A contributed $50,000 cash, and B contributed land worth $70,000 (with an adjusted basis of $40,000). B also received $20,000 cash from the corporation. A and B each receives 50% of the corporation's stock. What is the tax basis of the land to X Corp.?

    A.
    $40,000

    B.
    $50,000

    C.
    $60,000

    D.
    $70,000

    Answer is C. 60,000

    Explanation:

    X Corp's basis in the land is B's basis in the land ($40,000) plus any gain recognized by B. B's recognized gain is the lower of 1) the realized gain, or 2) the boot received. The realized gain is $30,000 ($70,000 – $40,000). The boot received is the cash of $20,000. Thus, the gain recognized is $20,000. X Corp's basis in the land is $60,000 ($40,000 + $20,000).

    B's amount realized is computed as follows: The corporation received cash of $50,000 and land of $70,000 for a total of $120,000. But it also gave $20,000 cash back to B as part of the formation. This is subtracted from above – – so the net value of what the corporation received is $100,000. $100,000 x 50% = $50,000, so that is the value of the stock received by B. His amount realized is $50,000 + cash received of $20,000 = $70,000.

    #767860
    CPA788
    Participant

    I just recently got on board with this awful formula. So when calculating the basis of property to a corp, you are going to have to first evaluate and calculate what gain, if any, the contributor made. That's why the 70k is being considered. B's basis was 40k, but the FMV was 70k, so B's realized gain is 30k – boot is 20k, take the lesser of those two (20k), add to basis (40k). I find it super odd that a corp has to find out what the contributor's gain was, because what if that info isn't always available? I guess it HAS to be, idk.

    I hope that made sense and didn't just repeat your explanation 🙂

    BEC - 74, 77
    FAR - 72, 71 (retake 7/29)
    REG - 69
    AUD - Q4 '16

    CA Candidate

    #767861
    CPA788
    Participant

    Hi ya'll. I haven't posted in the study group before until tonight. Taking my test on Saturday morning, and you know that feeling where you feel like you can't review enough? You reviewed agencies 4 days ago but it's almost go time and you swear you forgot half of it? How does one trudge on? I can hardly see straight. REG has been such a nice break from FAR but damn it's still tough.

    BEC - 74, 77
    FAR - 72, 71 (retake 7/29)
    REG - 69
    AUD - Q4 '16

    CA Candidate

    #767862
    mckan514w
    Participant

    @CPA788 you sound like you got this— @c1oth just to add to what CPA said this question is testing whether you know to take lower of realized value or boot… hence why they gave you the 70K so you could spend the time doing the extra calculation 🙂

    @CPA788 in your same boat- I test today and I hit the wall so to speak about 5 days ago- yes Reg has been a nice break from FAR to be honest Hell would have been a nice vacation from FAR but it is so much stuff to keep in your head. I have just been plodding through MCQs and re-reading my notes on the things that I seem to consistently miss- like CAP liability and Negotiable Paper… You have this… just take it a day at a time and knock out as many MCQs as you can… 4 days is almost here I have just been telling myself hold it inside your head a few more days….

    GOOD LUCK!

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767863
    Fk
    Participant

    What does Substantial Standard means

    #767864
    csvirk
    Participant

    A heavy equipment dealer would like to trade some business assets in a nontaxable exchange. Which of the following exchanges would qualify as nontaxable?

    A.
    The company jet for a large truck to be used in the corporation

    B.
    Investment securities for antiques to be held as investments

    C.
    A road grader held in inventory for another road grader

    Correct D.
    A corporate office building for a vacant lot

    Why C would not be consider like exchange? thank you

    FAR: 71, 77!
    AUD: 69, 80
    BEC: 72
    REG: 84

    #767865
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi All, I'm having problems with recognized gain on c corp. The question is a simulation and this is the info they provided: Assuming the following 4 partners have 100% ownership

    1) Clay – provided 20,000 boot, property FMV is 60,000 but his cost is 40,000
    2) Finch – provided 10,000 booth, property FMV is 50,000 but his cost is 30,000 with 20,000 recourse liability
    3) Lark – provided property FMV is 60,000 but his cost is 50,000, he also receive 10,000 boot
    4) Token – provided 10,000 cash, property FMV is 40,000 his cost is 5,000 with 20,000 recourse liability

    I'm having problem with Finch, Lark, and Token

    Finch:
    Amount Realized: 50,000
    Adj Basis 30,000
    Realized Gain 20,000
    Recognized Gain ??? (The ans is 0, because the liability was less than the assets basis, but can someone show me where the liability and asset basis? Which asset basis FMV or his cost, and what liability?

    Lark:
    Amount Realized 60,000
    Adj Basis 50,000
    Realized G/L 10,000
    Recognized Gain 10,000 boot he received , so does that mean if they receive boot is automatically the recognized gain?

    Token:
    Amount Realized 40,000
    Adj Basis 5,000
    Realized Gain 35,000
    Recognized Gain, why is 5,000?

    Thank you all!

    #767866
    csvirk
    Participant

    Dunn received 100 shares of stock as a gift from Dunn's grandparent. The stock cost Dunn's grandparent $32,000 and it was worth $27,000 at the time of the transfer to Dunn. Dunn sold the stock for $29,000. What amount of gain or loss should Dunn report from the sale of the stock?

    A.
    $0

    B.
    $2,000 gain

    C.
    $3,000 gain

    Incorrect D.
    $3,000 loss

    Why not D? correct answer is A. I am so confused!!

    FAR: 71, 77!
    AUD: 69, 80
    BEC: 72
    REG: 84

    #767867
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Hey Guys- I took advantage of a cancellation at prometrics and went in to test at 7:30 this morning… overall I am brain dead but don't want to vomit like I did after FAR…. either I was very well prepared or I effed up royally as I didn't really notice my testletts getting harder but I did seem to have more computations in 2 and 3 than I did in 1 so who knows…. Overall I felt good about it which can be a very bad and dangerous thing. Hit those ninja MCQs like no tomorrow some questions were almost word for word… (THANKS JEFF!!!! 🙂 ) I will say the devil is in the details there is a lot of minutia tested that if I had not taken the time to read all of the MCQ explanations I might have been “lost” on. and the SIMS…. HOLY FAR batman!!!! I am pretty sure I found the research one and there was one on a completely random topic that I just barely glanced at in Uber on the way to test center so am not hopeful at all on that one and PRAYING its a pre-test and the others just WOW- could have just as easily have been on FAR… I think if I failed it will be due to the SIMS…. fingers crossed….

    GOOD LUCK all– weekend off then on to BEC hope to see everyone there 🙂

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

Viewing 15 replies - 811 through 825 (of 1,691 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 55’ is closed to new replies.