REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 51

Viewing 15 replies - 751 through 765 (of 1,691 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #767793
    Tncincy
    Participant

    I was able to answer the question but the why explanation is very good.

    It begins with a 75
    Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to pass

    #767794
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Is there a limit on the deduction of bonus accruals for non-shareholder/employees? Becker Page R3-16 doesn't give any limit

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #767795
    alanam
    Participant

    I'm gearing up for take 2 of REG. I have 2 weeks to study. REEEAAAAALLLLYY not looking forward to this. Major cram cession coming on.

    And GO

    FAR - 79 (Expires 8/31/16)
    AUD - 75 (Expires 11/30/16)
    REG - 66 (June 8 Retake)
    BEC - 88 (Expires 8/31/17)

    #767796
    Claudia408
    Participant

    Far question in the Reg review course. I failed FAR miserably so can someone please help break this down? How does a dividend from a sub increase parent's loss?

    Parent company X and subsidiary company Y file a calendar year consolidated federal income tax return. Company X reported a $120,000 tax loss, which included a $10,000 dividend from Y. Company Y reported $140,000 of taxable income, which included $30,000 of dividends received from less than 20% owned stock investments. Neither company took into account any applicable dividends received deduction. What is the group's consolidated tax loss for the year?

    Answer: Parent Company X’s loss of $120,000 will be increased by the elimination of the $10,000 in intercompany dividends, resulting in a taxable loss of $130,000. Company Y’s taxable income includes dividend income of $30,000, which will be reduced by the 70% dividends-received deduction, or $21,000, reducing Y’s income to $119,000. On a consolidated return the tax loss will be $130,000 – $119,000 or $11,000.

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #767797
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Claudia- remember your dividend received deductions:
    Less than 20% then you can take 70% deduction
    between 20 and 80% you can take 80% deduction
    and over 80% (i.e. control) you can take 100% deduction

    In this question they are filing a consolidated return- so essentially you have:
    Parent Company X Taxable Income (120,000)
    Parent Company X Dividend Received Deduction (10,000)- they own at least 80% of Y in order to have control be able to file consolidated return (this in essence eliminates the 10,000 dividend that was included in the 120,000)

    Thus giving Company X a loss of (130,000)

    Another way to think of this is prior to the dividend Company X had Taxable Income of (130,000) they received a dividend of 10,000 which thus decreased their loss to (120,000) so when you take that out they are back up to a loss of 130,000

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767798
    Claudia408
    Participant

    mckan – lightbulb! lol, thank you!

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #767799
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    Damn BEC has really thrown me off my game. I was good last night, but today I'm feeling a lil salty. I HAVE to knock this one out of the ballpark on Tuesday! Sorry to derail the thread!

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    #767800
    mckan514w
    Participant

    🙁 right there with you mtaylo24- its just been an all around crappy review day for me… wasn't surprised I failed but it was still a punch to the gut to actually have confirmation and is completely making me re-think the “Im actually feeling fairly good about REG thoughts” I had been having…

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767801
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Hang in there- YOU CAN DO IT! We all can!!

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767802
    mckan514w
    Participant

    @Just3- the only limitation I have noted is there is a $1M max deduction for PUBLICLY TRADED companies…

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767803
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can anyone please explain me Trust for minor
    In the book, it says that it allow the parents and donor to obtain annual exclusion for the gift to trust even though the trust does not distribute its income annually.
    but the explanation of one question says that interest income is accumulating and distributed when the child reaches to 21, so it is a gift of future interest so cannot take the $14,000 annual exclusion. This thing is confusing to me.
    I understand the explanation but how both of them true .

    #767804
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I understand what are 5 conditions of stock redemption
    but when a question related to stock redemption came to me I confused that whether it is stock redemption or liquidation.
    So is there is the way to know the difference in between them especially one which says ” ALL of the shareholder’s stock is redeemed”.

    #767805
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Ano- a Crummy Trust is a safe harbor rule that allows the annual gift tax exclusion on gifts to trust… Essentially it is a trust that has a provision that the minor can withdraw the gift for use for up to thirty days after the donation is made thus working around the “future interest” rule making the gift a “present interest”- if the trust is not a crummy the gift deduction can not be taken…..

    As for the stock question section 302 IRC says that the distribution from a corp is considered a dividend (i.e not a liquidation)- UNLESS
    there is complete termination of the shareholders interest (i.e. 100% of shares)
    There is a substantially disproportionate redemption-(there was / is actually a question posted on this a page or two back- the ownership must be reduced 80% of his interest owned in the corporation prior to the redemption AND shareholder owns less than 50% of outstanding shares)
    The redemption is not equivalent to a divided — haven't come across a question like this so can't help explain!
    or the redemption is from a non-corporation shareholder in partial liquidation of the corporation

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767806
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @mckan514w
    Thank you, that helps, I am also taking on 27th of this month.

    #767807
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Good Luck!!! I feel like I have so much information crammed in between my ears that my head is going to explode and I am STILL feeling like I don't know enough… (it did't help that i was very unproductive this afternoon either)–

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

Viewing 15 replies - 751 through 765 (of 1,691 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 51’ is closed to new replies.