REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 50

Viewing 15 replies - 736 through 750 (of 1,691 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #767778
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Good luck today @monikernc!!!!

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767779
    mckan514w
    Participant

    In the first one they want you to know that the assignor is still liable unless the other party grants either a novation or releases the debtor from obligation

    In the second one- this ends up being unjust enrichment- Pierce owes Duke the money- this will not change even in assignment (see above). Then Pierce painted Dukes house under the contract that Lodge would pay Duke the money- this is a personal service contract where one party performed (Pierce did in fact paint the house) but Lodge did not perform (did not pay the money)- thus Duke is able to go after both of them for breach…

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767780
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Can someone clear up liability in an Agent / Principal relationship… my notes on this seem to be a confusing mess:

    If Principal is NOT known then agent is liable??
    If principal is partially known or fully known both liable??

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767781
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    This is just concerning the two Roger Acronyms “I Embraced EHF” for AGI adjustments and “COMMITT” for AGI deductions

    “I embraced EHF” includes medical expense premiums while “Committ” includes what I just labeled as “medical”. Is the itemized deduction for medical a deduction for medical expenses beyond those covered by insurance?

    Just a little confused here 🙁

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #767782
    mckan514w
    Participant

    @just three yes because you are did not pay out of pocket what insurance covered

    Okay I know this has been asked and answered but am getting royally messed up- we are using 2015 deduction and phaseout amounts correct??? Ninja questions seem to be reflecting this but keep getting roger questions wrong because they are using 2014 deduction amounts for some things,… 2015 is what I need to be concentrating on correct???

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767783
    Tncincy
    Participant

    O.k so I have been studying like somebody crazy because I desperately want to pass, I have an nts that expires in August, it covers reg and far. If I fail reg in June, can I reapply for July? or should I go for both in August and split my study time? I am having a really hard time and I feel like I am going around in circles. So please chime in with some suggestions.

    It begins with a 75
    Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to pass

    #767784
    Claudia408
    Participant

    Just3 – the H in IEMBRACED HEF is like Health Savings Plan contributions. Not medical expenses.

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #767785
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Thanks Mckan and Claudia,

    I don't know how I got confused there!

    In other news, score release day is the worst day to watch 2 hours of lecture on corporate tax …

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #767786
    Claudia408
    Participant

    mckan – i can't remember but i think Roger said that if you take the test in May 2016 you should know last 6 months of 2015 phase outs.

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #767787
    Claudia408
    Participant

    not even tripping about score release for FAR. seriously doubt i broke 60! WAAAAHHHHH!!! whatever. gotta worry about Reg first.

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #767788
    mckan514w
    Participant

    ugh score release- ha ha ha– seriously tempted NOT to check until Friday afternoon after Reg- that way I can drink away the misery for both…. but we all know there's no way I'll actually be able to do that- I'll take my Fail and run with it—

    Thanks Claudia on the info I'm just trying to cram it all in and its slowly oozing on out…

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767789
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    I need help with this one

    Peter is an auto mechanic. On November 25, Year 1, he made some major auto repairs on Harry’s Mercedes. Harry is an attorney. In exchange for the service, Harry is going to draft Peter’s will and represent him when he settles on his new house. Harry will perform all of these services in Year 2. The repair bill for the Mercedes came to $1,200. Both Peter and Harry are cash-basis taxpayers. How do they report this income?

    A. Both report $1,200 income in Year 1.
    B. Both report $1,200 income in Year 2.
    C. Harry reports $1,200 in Year 1 and Peter reports $1,200 in Year 2.
    D. Peter reports $1,200 in Year 1 and Harry reports $1,200 in Year 2.

    Answer (C) is correct.
    Under Sec. 451(a) and Reg. 1.451-1(a), a cash-basis taxpayer generally includes an item in income when it is actually or constructively received. Under Sec. 461(a) and Reg. 1.461-1, a cash-basis taxpayer generally reports income only in the year of actual receipt. Constructive receipt is equivalent to actual receipt. The services performed for Harry were completed in Year 1, and therefore he reports $1,200 of income in Year 1. The services performed for Peter were completed in Year 2, and therefore he reports $1,200 of income in Year 2.

    The question states the car was worked on in Year 1 by Pete and Harry will perform services in Year 2, but the answer explanation says the opposite. Can anyone explain this one?

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    #767790
    Josh
    Participant

    Good job, everyone! After score release on FAR I've been dreading for too long, I imagine, I need to keep focusing on REG? I'm scrambling, wondering about which strategy is going to make the difference for the future? It probably wouldn't hurt to see things from a Ninja point of view. I'm just thankful for Blitz this last week. Mainly been in Individual Tax getting ready for Property. Everyone sets the CSO-coverage a little different especially Gleim, my main source.

    #767791
    mckan514w
    Participant

    @Mtaylo24 I did some research and think I finally understand this… because Peter has performed his end of the service and Harry has received it and can determine the compensation for it- he in theory could perform his service at any time- in other words he does not have to wait until year 2 to draw up Peter's will he could have done this on November 26th right after he picked up his car. Thus it is income to him because he has constructively been able to determine compensation thus he recognizes it.

    Peter on the other hand has not received his services/ his compensation and can not determine if the work Harry does is actually worth the same amount of money as the car repairs- I mean what if Harry does a half-ass job and the will and rep is only worth $500. Thus he is not able to recognize any income until Harry performs.

    A little messed up if you ask me…. (posted some of the applicable paragraphs from IRS below)

    “in the case of compensation for services, no determination can be made as to the right to such compensation or the amount thereof until the services are completed, the amount of compensation is ordinarily income for the taxable year in which the determination can be made”

    “Income although not actually reduced to a taxpayer's possession is constructively received by him in the taxable year during which it is credited to his account, set apart for him, or otherwise made available so that he may draw upon it at any time, or so that he could have drawn upon it during the taxable year if notice of intention to withdraw had been given. However, income is not constructively received if the taxpayer's control of his receipt is subject to substantial limitations or restrictions.”

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #767792
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    @mckan514w That helps. Thanks!

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

Viewing 15 replies - 736 through 750 (of 1,691 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 50’ is closed to new replies.