- This topic has 1,691 replies, 118 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 6 months ago by
Just3Letters.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 18, 2016 at 4:44 am #200897
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 15, 2016 at 10:21 pm #767643
monikerncParticipanti know we have been around the bend on IRA contributions and phaseouts but ninja #1088 makes no sense. why does the solution multiply $4000×2 for the maximum contribution when only 1 IRA deduction for $4000 has been made? And why is the maximum only $4000?
Rita Spano is an active participant in a company retirement plan. Her husband, John, age 45, works for a company that does not have a retirement plan. The Spanos' joint adjusted gross income for 2015 is $187,000. John contributes $4,000 to an IRA for himself. How much of this $4,000 contribution for John can the Spanos deduct on their 2015 joint return?
A. $4,000
Correct B. $2,900
C. $2,000
D. $0Calculation for reduced IRA contribution:
1) Modified AGI $ 187,000
– 183,000
2) Difference between AGI and phaseout $ 4,000
Full contribution limit / 11,000
3) Reduction factor 0.3644) Maximum contribution ($4,000 x 2) $ 8,000
Reduction factor x 0.364
Reduction amount $ 2,912 ($2,900 rounded)FAR 7/25/15 76!
AUD 10/30/15 93
BEC 2/27/16 82
REG 5/23/16 88!
Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
if you want things to change, you have to do something differentMay 15, 2016 at 10:43 pm #767644
AnonymousInactive@monikernc
Ira phase out amount starts from 183000
Joint AGI = 187000
Phase out for joint filler (187000-183000)4000/20000*5500=1100
contribution made is 4000-1100=2900May 15, 2016 at 11:13 pm #767645
monikerncParticipantAno – thank you. what is the 20,000 in the 4,000/20,000 in your solution?
FAR 7/25/15 76!
AUD 10/30/15 93
BEC 2/27/16 82
REG 5/23/16 88!
Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
if you want things to change, you have to do something differentMay 15, 2016 at 11:31 pm #767646
AnonymousInactive@monikernc
computation of phase out is AGI – 61000/10000*5500for married filing jointly change the phase out starting amount which in your question is 183000 and multiply 10000 with 2 20000.
May 15, 2016 at 11:35 pm #767647
monikerncParticipantwhy 2? sorry, i am tired and this is not making sense.
FAR 7/25/15 76!
AUD 10/30/15 93
BEC 2/27/16 82
REG 5/23/16 88!
Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
if you want things to change, you have to do something differentMay 15, 2016 at 11:42 pm #767648
AnonymousInactivefor single taxpayer we divide by 10000
for married filing jointly we divide by 20000May 15, 2016 at 11:47 pm #767649
AnonymousInactiveclick on this link and look at F1(c)
May 16, 2016 at 12:00 am #767650
monikerncParticipantso, even though only one is contributing he gets to double the phaseout range to calculate his allowed deduction? wow, i need to get married again…
thank you Ano.
3 days, 12 hr/day on this stuff since friday and i am not feeling any more ready than i did friday morning
i sit next monday and hope to have a more productive week – i am living in very strange times right now. studying is a challenge.
FAR 7/25/15 76!
AUD 10/30/15 93
BEC 2/27/16 82
REG 5/23/16 88!
Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
if you want things to change, you have to do something differentMay 16, 2016 at 12:10 am #767651
AnonymousInactive@monikernc
I think you are more than ready for the exam , I am taking on 27th of this month and I just started corporation to review and still left the gift and estate to revise and then business law.May 16, 2016 at 12:31 am #767652
monikerncParticipantit took forever to get through biz law and even though i kept reviewing tax while going through it, it took so long that i have forgotten a lot of the little tax things. i have read all your posts this weekend – you know a lot more than i do at this point.
gift is not bad. estate can be a little tricky but not don't worry. biz law, look in the UCC while you study to get a feel for it for the sims. the UCC is a monster and the language is difficult. i want only one research question on my exam.i can't wait to take this exam but i really want to pass on first try so i keep plugging away
thank you so much for your help
FAR 7/25/15 76!
AUD 10/30/15 93
BEC 2/27/16 82
REG 5/23/16 88!
Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
if you want things to change, you have to do something differentMay 16, 2016 at 12:40 am #767653
monikerncParticipantis anyone else experiencing slow response times in the ninja REG mcq's? mine has been awful this weekend and today has been the worst
FAR 7/25/15 76!
AUD 10/30/15 93
BEC 2/27/16 82
REG 5/23/16 88!
Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
if you want things to change, you have to do something differentMay 16, 2016 at 12:57 am #767654
TimWantsTheLionParticipantSo, I'm confused now regarding Partnership Contributions and recognition of income after dealing with this problem in the NINJA MCQ bank:
Quigley, Roberk, and Storm form a corporation. Quigley exchanges $25,000 of legal fees for 30 shares of stock. Roberk exchanges land with a basis of $10,000 and a fair market value of $100,000 for 60 shares of stock. Storm exchanges $10,000 cash for 10 shares of stock. What amount of income should each shareholder recognize?
A. Quigley $0, Roberk $0, and Storm $0
B. Quigley $25,000, Roberk $90,000, and Storm $0
C. Quigley $25,000, Roberk $90,000, and Storm $10,000
D. Quigley $0, Roberk $90,000, and Storm $0
The correct answer is B. While I understand that nobody in the partnership combined owns 80% cash/property to have control (and thus, they must recognize income on their tax returns), I am baffled at the reason why Storm's cash contributed doesn't give him recongizable income. Does it not matter how much one owns in the partnership for cash contributions to not be recognizable income?
REG - 62, 71, 72 (Rematch sometime in October)
AUD - 65, 69, 70, 73, 72, 81 (Exp. 4/30/2017)
FAR - 61
BEC - 57, 73, 75 (Expired)May 16, 2016 at 1:51 am #767655
AnonymousInactive@tim
when there are not a 351 controlled transaction shareholders may recognize gain if the FMV of the property transferred is greater than its adjusted basis
Storm just gave cash and receive stock there is nothing to recognize gain.May 16, 2016 at 3:16 pm #767656
TncincyParticipantMay 16, 2016 at 3:59 pm #767657
mtaylo24ParticipantThey will never put an unfamiliar topic on an exam. They will hit you with questions from “unimportant” chapters, but I wouldn't go as far to call it “unfamiliar”.
AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16) -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 41’ is closed to new replies.
