- This topic has 1,691 replies, 118 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 6 months ago by
Just3Letters.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 18, 2016 at 4:44 am #200897
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 4, 2016 at 8:38 pm #767478
ABTX411ParticipantNumber 7 is the same concept as number 9 – you can only deduct the amount actually incurred, not the estimated expense. So for 7, you need to do a T-account to determine the amount of the debit: 120+16-90 = 46.
BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
REG - 88 - 5/19/2016May 4, 2016 at 8:39 pm #767479
AnonymousInactiveI am not sure about question 13 my answer is 139000 I don't know how to get 75000.
Anyone please help.May 4, 2016 at 8:43 pm #767480
ABTX411ParticipantFor question 13 – the election entitled the tax payer to carry-over basis.
BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
REG - 88 - 5/19/2016May 4, 2016 at 9:34 pm #767481
AnonymousInactive@blithesherry
for question 13
If property converted directly into property similar or related in service or use, complete non-recognition of gain is mandatory.
so the basis of the replacement property is the same as the property converted.in question13 warehouse is converted for the warehouse ,so no gain of $ 120000 will be recognized and the basis of the new warehouse will remain the same as $75000.
May 4, 2016 at 9:44 pm #767482
SaveBanditParticipant@Ano
For question 13, if Dawson had bought the new warehouse for $200k instead of 195k would the new basis be 80k? If so, would he recognize a gain for 5k?
4 for 4
FAR 85
AUD 94
BEC 86
REG 90May 4, 2016 at 10:12 pm #767483
AnonymousInactive@ save bandit
That rule is for property converted into similar property so no matter how much you reinvest.
when you buy exactly the same property then you must not recognize any gain and the basis would be the same as the old one.May 4, 2016 at 11:24 pm #767484
SaveBanditParticipant@ano
So what is the difference between question 13 and the question I posted on page 9? Why isn't its basis 30k?
Patty Cake owned real estate that was condemned by the state. Patty had purchased the property for $30,000 and received $50,000 from the state as a result of the condemnation. Patty purchased replacement real estate for $52,000. Patty's basis in the new real estate is
a. 30,000
b. 32,000
c. 50,000
d. 52,000Answer B.
New basis = New property cost – Deferred gain – Recognized gain
4 for 4
FAR 85
AUD 94
BEC 86
REG 90May 5, 2016 at 1:25 am #767485
AnonymousInactive@ SaveBandit
Special rules apply for real property used in a business or investment that is condemned. The replacement rules allow a greater flexibility in choosing replacement property, such as replacing raw land with developed land. In a direct conversion, the taxpayer receives the replacement property instead of money, in which case, the nonrecognition of realized gain is mandatory, and the replacement property acquires the carryover basis of the converted property; gain is recognized upon the disposition of the replacement property. However, if the taxpayer is compensated for the conversion by payment, then the taxpayer must elect to postpone the recognition of the gain; otherwise the realized gain is recognized in the year that it occurred.the detail information is given on this link, I am also getting through this question for the first time. I think the main point is the use of real property in business and for the investment purpose. the warehouse is used for the business that is why the nonrecognition of gain rule is applied.
https://thismatter.com/money/tax/involuntary-conversions-taxation.htmMay 5, 2016 at 1:30 am #767486
KJF1031ParticipantGain on stock held for more than 12 months and sold on October 15, 2015, that would otherwise be taxed at a 15% rate if it were ordinary income is taxed at a rate of:
A.
20%.B.
15%.C.
10%.Correct D.
0%.Aren't long term capital gains taxed at 15% only if the taxpayers marginal tax rate is between 25%-35%(There isn't even an answer choice high enough to be correct here?) . And long term capital gains taxed at 20% only if the taxpayers marginal tax rate is 39.6%. And long term capital gains aren't taxed if the taxpayers marginal tax rate is 15% or below.
How is the correct choice 0%? Shouldn't the correct choice be one of these: 25, 33, or 35%?
BEC: Passed (8/31)
AUD: Passed (11/20)
FAR: Passed (2/26)
REG: 5/22May 5, 2016 at 2:49 am #767487
AnonymousInactive@KJF1031
I think question is asking thatIf regular tax rate on ordinary income is 15%, then the marginal capital gain rate within these brackets will be what ?
so the answer will be 0%.
I think framing of the question is little weird .
Correct me if I am wrong.May 5, 2016 at 3:39 am #767488
AnonymousInactive@Ano You are definitely right and I just took REG and all too often we see questions that are framed poorly like this one. I wrote them a little comment with my opinion on this in the survey after the test. I wonder if they will consider it….
May 5, 2016 at 3:56 am #767489
AnonymousInactive@ chrisjets
How was your test ?
Do you have anything to tell about the AICPA released question no 13. which is posted on page 11.
hoping the material is still fresh in your mind.May 5, 2016 at 1:15 pm #767490
Future NinjaParticipantMay 5, 2016 at 3:00 pm #767491
TncincyParticipantMay 5, 2016 at 5:54 pm #767492
CPA2BEEParticipantQuick Corp. agreed to purchase 200 typewriters from Union Suppliers, Inc. Union is a wholesaler of appliances and Quick is an appliance retailer. The contract required Union to ship the typewriters to Quick by common carrier, “FOB Union Suppliers, Inc. Loading Dock.” Which of the parties bears the risk of loss during shipment?
a. Quick, because the risk of loss passes when the typewriters are delivered to the carrier.
b. Union, because both parties are merchants.
c. Union, because the risk of loss passes only when Quick receives the typewriters.
d. Quick, because title to the typewriters passed to Quick at the time of shipment.The answer is “a”. I picked “d” the first time. This was the explanation for d being wrong:
Choice “d” is incorrect. Although it is true that title passed to the buyer on delivery to the carrier, risk of loss does not necessarily follow title.
I'm not understanding why this makes “a” right and “d” wrong, can someone explain?
FAR - 80
AUD - 82
BEC - 80
REG - 85ETHICS - 90
EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 30’ is closed to new replies.
