- This topic has 1,691 replies, 118 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 8 months ago by
Just3Letters.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 18, 2016 at 4:44 am #200897
jeff
KeymasterWelcome to the Q2 2016 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.
Some BLITZ videos to help your exams: https://www.another71.com/ninja-blitz
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 19, 2016 at 1:21 am #767058
SaveBandit
ParticipantThe explanations on these partnership questions seem to conflict. Thoughts?
Day's adjusted basis in LMN Partnership interest is $50,000. During the year, Day received a nonliquidating distribution of $25,000 cash plus land with an adjusted basis of $15,000 to LMN and a FMV of $20,000. How much is Day's basis in the land?
a. $10,000
b. $20,000
c. $25,000
d. $15,000Answer D. In a nonliquidating distribution, the partner takes the partnership basis for assets distributed. This basis cannot exceed the partner's partnership interest.
Owen's tax basis in Regal Partnership was $18,000 at the time Owen received a nonliquidating distribution of $3,000 cash and land with an adjusted basis of $7,000 to Regal and a FMV of $9,000. Regal did not have unrealized receivables, appreciated inventory, or properties that had been contributed by its partners. Disregarding any income, loss, or any other parthership distribution for the year, what was Owen's tax basis in Regal after the distribution?
a. $9,000
b. $8,000
c. $7,000
d. $6,000Choice B. is correct. In a nonliquidating distribution the partner's basis is reduced first by the amount of cash received and then by the adjusted basis of any property received.
What am I missing here? If you apply the logic in question 1 to question 2 you get $7,000 not $8,000.
4 for 4
FAR 85
AUD 94
BEC 86
REG 90March 19, 2016 at 2:59 am #767059ChristieF
Participant@SaveBandit, you are correct, but the second question is asking the partners remaining basis in the partnership, so $18,000 – $3,000 cash distribution and then minus the $7,000 land baits distribution, that leaves the partner $8,000 basis left in the partnership.
March 19, 2016 at 5:46 am #767060pracap
ParticipantGuys,
Does anybody have clarity on Basis & At-risk rules with regard to PS and S corp?
Its so confusing!!! Can somebody help me…March 19, 2016 at 6:56 am #767061mariam almas
Participant@pracap i have a same question as yours, hope somebody will explain it.
AUD: 81 (Done)
REG: Currently studying
FAR: TBD
BEC: TBDNH
March 19, 2016 at 4:48 pm #767062tickles
ParticipantHi,
Does anyone understand why for computing the taxable dividend procedure is different between a and d/e?
AEP CEP Distribution (july 1)
a. $9,000 $9,000 $16,000 Answer is :16000 dividend
d. $40,000 ($55,000) $15,000 Answer: is 12500 dividend
e. $30,000 ($20,000) $18,000 Answer is: 18000 dividend
Im not understanding why we would not prorate letter a as well then since technically on July 1, they would have only half of the 9000 CEP at that date, and so AEP and CEP would be 13500
Does anyone have insight on why if CEP is negative, we would prorate but not in situations where there is enough CEP and AEP?
Thanks!March 19, 2016 at 4:48 pm #767063tickles
ParticipantHi,
Does anyone understand why for computing the taxable dividend procedure is different between a and d/e?
AEP CEP Distribution (july 1)
a. $9,000 $9,000 $16,000 Answer is :16000 dividend
d. $40,000 ($55,000) $15,000 Answer: is 12500 dividend
e. $30,000 ($20,000) $18,000 Answer is: 18000 dividend
Im not understanding why we would not prorate letter a as well then since technically on July 1, they would have only half of the 9000 CEP at that date, and so AEP and CEP would be 13500
Does anyone have insight on why if CEP is negative, we would prorate but not in situations where there is enough CEP and AEP?
Thanks!March 19, 2016 at 6:27 pm #767064ChristieF
ParticipantHey everyone, quick question. So.. I'm using the Wiley books, Ninja MCQs and I've got the Yaeger lectures from last year.
I've been considering getting Ninja notes or audio for REG, but wanted to see if anyone else thinks that would be too much. I am currently the only one working, my husband is having a hard time finding a new job, so making sure I'm smart about spending that $60+ for notes,etc is super important right now. I took notes off the free Blitz last weekend, but wanted to see what everyone thought of the notes and if I'd need them. I've failed 3 exams already – and now I really can't afford to not pass another exam. I want to be as prepared as possible. Notes or no notes? Thanks everyone!!March 19, 2016 at 8:19 pm #767065SaveBandit
ParticipantI've bought ninja notes for previous sections but haven't used them much. Not that they're bad – they're basically a high level summary of all the major topics. I just would rather have more detail in my notes.
4 for 4
FAR 85
AUD 94
BEC 86
REG 90March 19, 2016 at 8:22 pm #767066SaveBandit
ParticipantWhen Jim and Nina became engaged in April of the current year, Jim gave Nina a ring that had a FMV of $50k. After their wedding in July that same year, Jim gave Nina $75k in cash so Nina could have her own bank account. Both are US citizens. What was the amount of Jim's marital deduction?
A. 0
B. $125k
C. $75k
D. $115kAnswer C.
I understand why the answer is C but what I don't get is why you get a deduction for giving your spouse $75K. Wouldn't people just give their spouse a bunch of money every year and reduce their tax liability to nothing? I know that isn't the case so there must be parameters around this rule that I am missing.
4 for 4
FAR 85
AUD 94
BEC 86
REG 90March 20, 2016 at 1:30 am #767067Bnots
Participant@SaveBandit, it's not an income tax deduction but rather a gift tax deduction. They're two different taxing schemes. If I give you $75,000, I have to file a Form 709 and pay a gift tax on $61,000 ($75k minus the $14k annual gift exclusion) of that amount. That's in addition to the income taxes I paid when earning it. If I gave that $75,000 (or $75 million for that matter) to my wife, assuming she's a US citizen, I wouldn't owe gift tax on any of it because of the marital deduction.
There's also a lifetime exclusion (the unified credit) which is, IIRC, $5.34 million beginning with the 2014 tax year and $5,43 million beginning with the 2015 tax year, and shared with your estate when you die. Because I haven't used any of my unified credit, I wouldn't actually owe any gift taxes on the $75,000 I gave you.
March 20, 2016 at 5:35 am #767068pracap
ParticipantGuys,
Am reposting same query, please somebody help me….Does anybody have clarity on Basis & At-risk rules with regard to PS and S corp?
Its so confusing!!!March 20, 2016 at 5:48 am #767069Anonymous
InactiveBasis and at-risk rules are definitely must-know topic before testing. You'll most likely see this topic in your SIMs. I took REG six times and I still could not figure it out.
You might need to keep researching online, or post the entire question (plus the solution), then ask what you want to clarify with.
Here's what I dug from somewhere:
Good luck!
March 20, 2016 at 2:06 pm #767070SaveBandit
ParticipantMarch 20, 2016 at 2:32 pm #767071SaveBandit
ParticipantMarch 20, 2016 at 4:56 pm #767072pracap
Participant@ Amor D and SaveBandit
thanks for your feedback.
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 2’ is closed to new replies.