REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 14

Viewing 15 replies - 196 through 210 (of 1,691 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #767238
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @ future ninja
    for the previous question how the answer is C.$4,000………$10,000
    can you explain the answer please.

    #767239
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @Ano

    Betty contributed land with a $6,000 basis and a $10,000 FMV to the ABC Partnership in Year 1. In Year 2, the land was distributed to Sally, another partner in the partnership. At the time of the distribution, the land had a $12,000 fair market value, and Sally had a $30,000 basis for her partnership interest. What gain is recognized by Betty on the distribution? What is Sally’s basis for the distributed land?

    This is what they call pre-distribution gain. Actual Distribution is in current Y2. There was a pending Betty's gain from Y1 of usd4,000 which will be recognized upon actual distribution. For Land New Basis on Y2 (Adjusted Basis plus Gain recognized) which is usd6,000 plus 4,000 = usd10,000.

    – See more at: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-study-group-q2-2016/page/5?replies=196#post-907136

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #767240
    Andyred04
    Participant

    Betty will only recognize that $4,000 pre-contribution gain if the asset is distributed to a non-contributing partner within 7 years of initial contribution.

    FAR: 80 (Gleim, Ninja Notes, Ninja MCQs)
    REG: 87 (Gleim, Ninja Notes, Ninja MCQs)
    BEC: 87 (Gleim, Ninja Notes, Ninja MCQs)
    AUD: 8/27/16

    PA Candidate

    #767241
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @Andyred04 – you explain it very well. Thank you.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #767242
    Andyred04
    Participant

    @Ano, the reasoning behind the $10,000 basis to Sally is a little more difficult (actually I just searched my Gleim book for a few minutes to figure it out). When this pre-contribution gain is recognized, the initial basis of the asset is increased by the amount of gain the contributor recognized. Therefore, the $6,000 initial basis in the asset will be increased by the $4,000 pre-contribution gain. Then, the distributee (Sally) will take a transfer basis (Betty's basis + the pre-contribution gain) in the distributed property.

    FAR: 80 (Gleim, Ninja Notes, Ninja MCQs)
    REG: 87 (Gleim, Ninja Notes, Ninja MCQs)
    BEC: 87 (Gleim, Ninja Notes, Ninja MCQs)
    AUD: 8/27/16

    PA Candidate

    #767243
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @ Andyred04 .@ future ninja
    thank you for the explanation
    this is a new topic for me ,my study course didn't mention anything about pre-contribution gain.

    #767244
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @Andyred04 – I'm using Ninja plus Gleim this time around. I read that explanation and I translated it to my own understanding.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #767245
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @Ano – at risk question:

    The at-risk limitation provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit:

    I.A partner’s deduction for his or her distributive share of partnership losses.
    II.A partnership’s net operating loss carryover.

    A. I only.
    B. II only.
    C. Both I and II.
    D. Neither I nor II.

    answer: A

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #767246
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    everyone: please help why we should use 50% to get the share of Andrew's?

    Andrew is a 40% partner in the ABC Partnership, in which capital is a material income-producing factor. He gives one-half of his interest to his brother, John. During the current year, Andrew performs services for the partnership for which reasonable compensation is $65,000 but for which he accepts no pay. Andrew and John are each credited with a $100,000 distributive share of the partnership’s ordinary income. How much should Andrew report?

    A. $132,500
    B. $100,000
    C. $67,500
    D. $105,000

    Answer: A

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #767247
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    Because he gave one half interest to his brother. They are both credited 100,000K and he takes half of the 65K (32.5K)

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    #767248
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @mtaylo24 – Thank you. My concern is he has 40% interest and he gave half of his interest, then it should be 20% right? Or I need to bump my head against the wall now!???

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #767249
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    another one:

    Partners Ann, Bob, and Carol of ABC, a calendar-year partnership, share partnership profits and losses in a ratio of 5:3:2, respectively. All three materially participate in the partnership business. Each partner’s adjusted basis in the partnership as of December 31, 2015, was as follows:

    Ann $19,000
    Bob 22,000
    Carol 9,000

    The partnership incurred an operating loss of $50,000 in 2015. What are Ann’s, Bob’s, and Carol’s shares of the loss to be reported on their 2015 individual income tax returns?

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #767250
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    Half his interest would be 20%. I told you wrong in my explanation, but they yielded the same result. the $65K is included in the $200K they got. So Andrew gets the full $65 K for his services and they split the remaining $135,000 (67,500 a piece) which is still $132,500 for Andrew. I hate REG, I'm going back to the BEC thread lol.

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    #767251
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @mtaylo24 – laugh out loud!

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #767252
    Tncincy
    Participant

    I think the loss is distributed per ratio of each, then limited to given basis, per each.
    so the loss is 50,000

    Ann share is 25,000 of loss, basis is 19,000, loss amount is 6
    Bob share is 15,000 of loss, basis is 22,000, loss amount is 15
    Carol share is 10,000 of loss, basis is 9,000, loss amount is 1

    I got lost trying to type this in….I guess it's good to turn it into a sim. My understanding is the loss is limited to basis and the remainder of the loss is carried forward. I did something wrong I think ( trying to participate)

    It begins with a 75
    Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to pass

Viewing 15 replies - 196 through 210 (of 1,691 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 14’ is closed to new replies.