REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 105

Viewing 15 replies - 1,561 through 1,575 (of 1,691 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #768603
    marqzho
    Participant

    Single or Married Filing Separately

    Your standard deduction starts at $6,300.

    Add $1,550 if you were born before January 2, 1951.
    Add $1,550 if you were blind as of December 31, 2015.
    Example: Single filer Joe, who was born in 1972 and has been blind since birth, has a standard deduction of $6,300 + $1,550 = $7,850.

    Married Filing Jointly or Qualified Widow(er) with Dependent Child

    Your standard deduction starts at $12,600.

    Add $1,250 if you were born before January 2, 1951.
    Add $1,250 if your jointly-filing spouse was born before January 2, 1951.
    Add $1,250 if you were blind as of December 31, 2015.
    Add $1,250 if your jointly-filing spouse was blind as of December 31, 2015.
    Example: Joint filers Pat and Tracy, who were both born in 1941 and are not blind, have a standard deduction of $12,600 + $1,250 + $1,250 = $15,100.

    Head of Household

    Your standard deduction starts at $9,250.

    Add $1,550 if you were born before January 2, 1951.
    Add $1,550 if you were blind as of December 31, 2015.
    Example: Head of Household filer Mary, who was born in 1963 and is not blind, has a standard deduction of $9,250.

    by turbotax

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #768604
    CPA2BEE
    Participant

    I really need to study the accounting for losses when Corps sell or distribute to shareholders…

    FAR - 80
    AUD - 82
    BEC - 80
    REG - 85

    ETHICS - 90
    EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
    Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016

    #768605
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Hi Marqzho, welcome back 🙂

    Congrats on those amazing scores!

    @CPA2BEE,

    I haven't really thought much about the losses. I just know gains. I'll check it out too!

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #768606
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Is Jeff going to launch yet the Q3 Study Group by midnight tonight EST?

    #768607
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Note: I just read in my notes that you don't recognize any losses for corporate distributions

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #768608
    CPA2BEE
    Participant

    So Corporations never recognize losses on distributions?

    What about when they sell assets to shareholder for cash?

    FAR - 80
    AUD - 82
    BEC - 80
    REG - 85

    ETHICS - 90
    EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
    Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016

    #768609
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    All I can find is information on recognizing a loss on liquidating distributions. Upon liquidation, you recognize a gain or loss but that is in respect to the capital accounts.

    What we are talking about is a normal sale of property, still looking.

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #768610
    CPA2BEE
    Participant

    Per Becker book for Corporate Liquidation:

    Corp Sells Assets and Distributes Cash to Shareholders:
    – Corp Gain(Loss) = Sales Price – Basis

    Corp Distributes Assets to Shareholders:
    – Corp Gain(Loss) = FMV – Basis

    This is limited information they give and there must be exceptions, because if the second item were true then there would have been a loss recognized in the problem I posted.

    FAR - 80
    AUD - 82
    BEC - 80
    REG - 85

    ETHICS - 90
    EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
    Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016

    #768611
    CPA2BEE
    Participant

    Kent Corp. is a calendar year accrual basis C corporation. In Year 1, Kent made a nonliquidating distribution of property with an adjusted basis of $150,000 and a fair market value of $200,000 to Reed, its sole shareholder.

    The following information pertains to Kent:
    Reed's basis in Kent stock at January 1, Year 1 $ 500,000
    Accumulated earnings and profits at January 1, Year 1 125,000
    Current earnings and profits for Year 1 (from operations) 60,000

    What was taxable as dividend income to Reed for Year 1?
    a. $185,000
    b. $200,000
    c. $150,000
    d. $60,000

    FAR - 80
    AUD - 82
    BEC - 80
    REG - 85

    ETHICS - 90
    EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
    Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016

    #768612
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    I was originally thinking B because of the FMV is taxable thing.

    But… I know that there is no tax to extent of AAA which would be 185,000…

    I'll Say B I guess.

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #768613
    CPA2BEE
    Participant

    @Just3 you are right. I picked A, forgetting that the 50,000 gain to the Corp upon distribution is included in AAA. So AAA would = 125,000 + 60,000 + 50,000 = 235,000. So the entire 200,000 is taxable. This is all so much to remember every time lol

    FAR - 80
    AUD - 82
    BEC - 80
    REG - 85

    ETHICS - 90
    EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
    Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016

    #768614
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    OHHH I just got lucky. I wasn't even thinking about the 50,000 gain. I've done that before on a few mcq.

    I was also thinking the wrong way about AAA

    So to get this straight: To extent of AAA, distributions ARE taxable as dividend income (which totally makes sense) and after AAA is 0, ordinary income right?

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #768615
    CPA2BEE
    Participant

    @Just3 assuming you are talking about taxable to the shareholder….

    For Shareholders:
    – Distributions are taxable as dividends to extent of AAA
    – Once AAA = 0, Distributions are Return of Capital until stock basis = 0
    – Once AAA & Stock Basis = 0, Distributions are taxable as capital gain? (I think)

    For Corps:
    – For property distributions, Corps recognize gains (FMV – Basis)

    FAR - 80
    AUD - 82
    BEC - 80
    REG - 85

    ETHICS - 90
    EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
    Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016

    #768616
    CPA2BEE
    Participant

    Dole, the sole owner of Enson Corp., transferred a building to Enson. The building had an adjusted tax basis of $35,000 and a fair market value of $100,000. In exchange for the building, Dole received $40,000 cash and Enson common stock with a fair market value of $60,000. What amount of gain did Dole recognize?
    a. $5,000
    b. $0
    c. $40,000
    d. $65,000

    FAR - 80
    AUD - 82
    BEC - 80
    REG - 85

    ETHICS - 90
    EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
    Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016

    #768617
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    C.

    And the basis in stock should be 75,000. I'm always thinking about basis implications now haha

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

Viewing 15 replies - 1,561 through 1,575 (of 1,691 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 105’ is closed to new replies.