REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 61

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192517
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    “Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam

    Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 901 through 915 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #678108
    julietul
    Member

    @ Gabe, going back to IRA question posted earlier….looking into this question has been fun, and I don't clearly understand it yet. So looking for more help.

    I found the example in 2013 Becker book where an active participant single taxpayer has AGI of 61,000. The phaseout threshold for single being (59,000-69,000). Took excess of ($61-$59K)/10,000 (the phaseout range), gives a 20% phase out percentage. Take max allowed $5000 x 20% = $1000. So max deduction is decreased $5000-$1000 = $4000.

    So…if we apply this to Rita Spano below….I don't come up with the same answer. The excess $4000/$10000 range gives a 40% phase out percentage. Taking $4000 x 40% = 1600. So I would think to lower max allowed deduction to $4000-1600 = $2400….but this is not even an answer choice….

    Rita Spano is an active participant in a company retirement plan. Her husband, John, age 45, works for a company that does not have a retirement plan. The Spanos' joint adjusted gross income for 2014 is $185,000. John contributes $4,000 to an IRA for himself. How much of this $4,000 contribution for John can the Spanos deduct on their 2014 joint return?

    A.

    $4,000

    B.

    $3,200

    C.

    $2,000

    D.

    $0

    Anyone know how they are calculating this?!

    Here is the answer:

    Beginning in 1998, individuals are not considered participants in a company retirement plan simply because their spouses are. However, the maximum deductible IRA contribution for a nonparticipant spouse is phased out for couples with joint return adjusted gross incomes between $181,000 and $191,000. In this case, the Spanos' AGI is $4,000 over the beginning of the $10,000 phaseout range so their maximum $4,000 deduction is reduced by $800 ($4,000 × 2 ÷ 10) to arrive at $3,200.

    FAR - pass (expires 7/31/15)
    AUD - pass
    BEC - pass
    REG - April 20

    #678109
    Gabe
    Participant

    @jul I know! I get the same calculation! Maybe typo?

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #678110
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I've been lurking this thread off and on. I wish I contributed more, but I'm honestly afraid of giving out wrong info if someone had a question. There have been some instances where I was going to ask a question, but in typing it out I was able to figure out the answer.

    Anyway, with April approaching, I just wanted to say GL to Gabe and everyone else taking REG during Q2.

    WE GOT THIS!

    #678111
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Man I hate pension/IRA questions. I understand them on a general level pretty well but all of the thresholds trip me up. I've been taking the stance that the exam most likely won't get that specific.

    For example, here's the explanation for the one I just missed:

    “In 2014, the phaseout of the IRA deduction for married taxpayers participating in another pension plan filing jointly exists for AGI between $96,000 and $116,000. Since their AGI is halfway between $96,000 and $116,000, only half of the $11,000 is deductible.”

    Do you think I'm making a mistake not really hammering down these thresholds? Becker constantly reinforced not memorizing phaseouts but it's still discouraging missing these.

    #678112
    Gabe
    Participant

    @angel I wouldn't be too worried about the thresholds. Know the general idea.

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #678113
    swilk
    Member

    HELP!

    I know this question will depend more on my time, and individual needs, but I just want some advice

    I scheduled my REG exam for May 1st. Life's been a little crazy, with work and a newborn being the major detractors from studying. I have not been able to study at the pace I initially planned, and have barely got through any material to date. I don't want to move the exam date back any further. Do I have enough time to get through all of REG in the next month or so? Or should I just throw my initial REG plan out the window and hit BEC hard (on the same NTS)? I'm leaning towards the BEC route, as I only have about a month, give or take, for studying. BEC just seems like far less material to cover in the shortened time frame I have allotted myself. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

    AUD - 90 (2.26.2015)
    BEC - 76 (5.4.2015)
    REG - 79 (8.31.2015)
    FAR - 76 (2.22.2016)

    Roger and Ninja MCQ FTW.

    #678114
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Without knowing your specific situation, you won't get through all of REG's material by May 1.

    BEC can be done in 2 months easily though. If you plan BEC towards the end of May, you should be OK.

    #678115
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Do bec. To much material in reg for only 1 month of studying. I have mine scheduled for may 4th and I'm half way done with my second to last chapter. I'm also a full time studier and have no other obligations. Just aim for bec at the end of May and start studying for reg in June and take it sometime in q3. Assuming your NTS will make it that far and you have no more obstacles preventing you from studying.

    #678116
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can someone explain accumulated adjustment accounts in English lol

    #678117
    OnlyBelieve
    Participant

    Gabe- I am reworking all ninja sims i have constantly scored below 70. Just something to keep me busy till the 4th:).

    On a more serious note, i am concentrating more on concepts regarding corp taxation and like kind exchanges. I plan to do 30 mins of my blitz every night after two hours of mcq's. Although, the questions have become all too familiar, i cannot afford to be complacent. It's easy to forget very simple principles, so i am keeping up with it. I am also listening to a little bit of ninja audio and reviewing my personal notes on my lunch break. I plan to take Friday off, and go through multiple sets of mcq's and all of ninja blitz again.

    The morning of my exam, i will review more notes and mcq's. I don't buy the idea of relaxing the day or two before your test!

    I have used these strategies for BEC and AUD and its never failed me. I BELIEVE IN JUMP-STARTING YOUR BRAIN THE MORNING BEFORE YOUR EXAM:) So that as soon as you see the questions on the exam, you know what to do immediately.

    What's your game plan Gabe?

    AUD - DONE
    BEC - DONE
    REG - 04/04
    FAR - 05/30

    #678118
    OnlyBelieve
    Participant

    Fuller was the owner and beneficiary of a $200,000 life insurance policy on a parent. Fuller sold the policy to Decker, for $25,000. Decker paid a total of $40,000 in premiums. Upon the death of the parent, what amount must Decker include in gross income?

    A.

    $0

    B.

    $135,000

    C.

    $160,000

    D.

    $200,000

    AUD - DONE
    BEC - DONE
    REG - 04/04
    FAR - 05/30

    #678119
    Gabe
    Participant

    Sorry my posts haven't been showing up for some reason…

    @only same game plan. I never rest the day before an exam…probably do some light note reading on the day of. Since he wasn't the beneficiary he has to include all of it in gross income.

    Also think of aaa as retained earnings for s corps.

    In response to your question. Answer is b. Take the amount he paid for it and subtract expenses/premiums.

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #678120
    Gabe
    Member

    This is from a Wiley sim…org had $50k or org expenditures…I answered $5k as deductible, but below they calculate as $8k. Why are they amortizing $45k when you only deduct and amortize when it's over $50k?

    ($8,000) A corporation may deduct up to $5,000 of organizational expenditures for the tax year in which the corporation begins business. This $5,000 amount must be reduced by the amount by which organizational expenditures exceed $50,000. Remaining expenditures are deducted ratably over the 180-month period beginning with the month in which the corporation begins business. Aviator's qualifying expenditures include the legal fees and state incorporation fees, which total $50,000. However, the $15,000 commission for selling stock is neither deductible nor amortizable. The amount of Aviator's deduction for organizational expenditures for 2013 is $5,000 + ($45,000 x 12/180) = $8,000.

    AUD: 84
    BEC: 76
    FAR: 81
    REG: 4/3/15

    OK Candidate

    #678121
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    If it's 50,000 or less you subtract 5,000 right away. I believe angel watch posted about this a few pages back. So they had org costs of 50,000 you subtract 5,000 and amortize the rest over 180. Anything over 50,000 is reduced dollar for dollar. Until you hit 55,000 then you can't subtract 5,000 anymore because it's phased out. I was asking about this earlier. Why do initially subtract 5,000 then to compute the expense you add 5,000.

    #678122
    Gabe
    Member

    ah duh…I just didn't think you could deduct more than $5k on the tax return.

    in re: to your question, look at it this way:

    $23k org exp

    $5k exp


    > $5k

    = 18k to be amortized-> 1.2

    = total amount to be expensed $6.2

    The $5k is expensed (and it lowers your “base” for amortization) AND you have to expense the amortization for the year.

    AUD: 84
    BEC: 76
    FAR: 81
    REG: 4/3/15

    OK Candidate

Viewing 15 replies - 901 through 915 (of 3,544 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 61’ is closed to new replies.