- This topic has 3,544 replies, 143 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 2 months ago by
falizadeh.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 5, 2015 at 8:08 pm #192517
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 24, 2015 at 7:01 pm #677956
terryharmMember@Gabe looks like you are getting ready, just in case I don't get back I want to wish you all of the best. Keep working hard and you got this, I see a High 80 score coming your way. See you on the other side of being done with exams, and working with the State to get them everything they want to give you the license….
BEC: 81
FAR: 75
AUD: 81
REG: 85PA license Pending..
March 24, 2015 at 7:21 pm #677957
GabeParticipant@terry thanks so much!
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016March 24, 2015 at 8:16 pm #677958
AnonymousInactiveSo I finally got around to doing the Sims in Becker this weekend and most Sims are just a cluster of multiple choice on 1 topic. Itemized deductions, Charitable contributions, DRD deduction, like kind exchanges etc.
I fully expecting to fill out to a tax return for an individual, do the AMT and compare against the tax return, and fill out a corporate tax return. For example, in FAR they had you prepare a statement of cash flows. It seems like none of these “fillout the tax form” simulations exist for the Becker.. I actually took Reg almost 6 years ago and it didn't used to be like this.
I know the exam has changed since then, but should I not be expected to fill out a tax return for an individual/corporation any more?
March 24, 2015 at 8:26 pm #677959
Peterman25ParticipantIs it me or is there some funny math going on here in this MCQ? Where is this extra 4,000 coming from? 174,000-34,000 = 144,000? This is the answer explanation:
When a partner sells his interest in a partnership and he is relieved from his share of partnership liabilities, then the amount realized is the amount of cash received plus his share of liabilities. Carr’s amount realized will be $174,000. Carr’s adjusted basis of $34,000, which also includes his share of the partnership liabilities, is subtracted from the amount realized. This leaves a realized gain of $144,000.
To the extent any of the realized gain is attributable to unrealized receivables or substantially appreciated inventory, there will be gain recognized as ordinary income. In this case, there are unrealized receivables with an adjusted basis of $0 and a fair market value of $420,000. Carr’s share of the $420,000 is $140,000 ($420,000 ÷ 3). Carr will have ordinary income of $140,000 and capital gain of $4,000 from the sale of his partnership interest.
Amount realized: Cash received $154,000
+ Liability relief ($60,000 ÷ 3) 20,000
= Total amount realized $174,000
Less: Adjusted basis: Carr, capital account $ 14,000
+ Carr’s share of partnership liabilities 20,000
= Carr’s adjusted basis in the partnership (34,000)
Realized gain $140,000
Gain recognized as ordinary income due to unrealized
receivables ($420,000 ÷ 3) $140,000
Gain recognized as capital gain 4,000
Total realized and recognized gain $144,000
BEC 7/14 - PASS
FAR 10/14 - PASS
AUD 1/15 - PASS
REG 4/15 - PASSAZ license - Official 8/20/2015
March 24, 2015 at 8:32 pm #677960
GabeParticipant@club depends. I've heard of people that had to fill out tax returns as a sim. I took it in January and didn't have to. I also took FAR many times and never had to do a statement of cash flows, so I think it's just luck of the draw
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016March 24, 2015 at 8:35 pm #677961
GabeParticipant@Peterman I don't have all the info for that MCQ but it looks like in the “paragraph” portion it was misstated as $144k realized gain, but down in the calculation it shows a $140 realized gain.
What MCQ is that? Number wise? Maybe I can look it up and give a better explanation.
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016March 24, 2015 at 8:37 pm #677962
GabeParticipantWhen an agent acts for an undisclosed principal, the principal will not be liable to third parties if the
A. Principal ratifies a contract entered into by the agent.
B. Agent acts within an implied grant of authority.
C. Agent acts outside the grant of actual authority.
The only other type of authority an agent may have is apparent authority, and this type CANNOT exist if the principal is undisclosed. Apparent authority exists when a third party reasonably believes, based on a principal's actions, that an agent has authority to do something. If the third party does not know who the principal is, this cannot happen. Therefore, the only authority an agent may have in this situation is actual authority. If the agent exceeds all authority given to him, then the principal is not bound to the contract.
D. Principal seeks to conceal the agency relationship.
So…an agent cannot have implied authority?! Or is this just because it is an undisclosed principal?
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016March 24, 2015 at 9:15 pm #677963
Peterman25ParticipantIt is a NINJA question. #1853 category 6E4.
Here is the top half:
The personal service partnership of Allen, Baker & Carr had the following cash-basis balance sheet at December 31, Year 1:
Adjusted Basis Market
Assets per Books Value
Cash $102,000 $102,000
Unrealized accounts receivable — 420,000
Totals $102,000 $522,000
Liability and Capital
Note payable $60,000 $ 60,000
Allen, capital 14,000 154,000
Baker, capital 14,000 154,000
Carr, capital 14,000 154,000
Totals $102,000 $522,000
Carr, an equal partner, sold his partnership interest to Dole, an outsider, for $154,000 cash on January 1, Year 2. In addition, Dole assumed Carr’s share of the partnership’s liability.
What amount of ordinary income should Carr report in his Year 2 income tax return on the sale of his partnership interest?
Incorrect A.
$0
B.
$20,000
C.
$34,000
D.
$140,000
BEC 7/14 - PASS
FAR 10/14 - PASS
AUD 1/15 - PASS
REG 4/15 - PASSAZ license - Official 8/20/2015
March 24, 2015 at 9:30 pm #677964
GabeParticipantG/L= Amt real- basis
$140k= $154k-$14k
Any assets sold that are not capital= ordinary gain (e.g. unrealized receivables, appreciated inventory)
D. Ordinary income= unreal. rec of $420k/3= $140k taxed as ordinary
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016March 24, 2015 at 9:53 pm #677965
Peterman25ParticipantI get that part. The 4,000? Is that just the math in the question being wrong?
BEC 7/14 - PASS
FAR 10/14 - PASS
AUD 1/15 - PASS
REG 4/15 - PASSAZ license - Official 8/20/2015
March 24, 2015 at 10:56 pm #677966
AnonymousInactiveIn regards to casualty loss. If the insurance recovery was greater than loss (lesser of cost or decrease in fmw) I know their is no itemized deduction. However, is the excess taxable as additional income?
March 24, 2015 at 11:45 pm #677967
AnonymousInactiveA $50,000 insurance recovery on a small warehouse destroyed by fire was received. It was used in the business and depreciated using the straight-line method. Its adjusted tax basis at the date of the fire was $52,400. A new warehouse was rebuilt at a cost of $60,000.
What is the basis of the new warehouse?
a) $52,400
b) $57,600
c) $60,000
d) $62,400
March 24, 2015 at 11:55 pm #677968
OnlyBelieveParticipantB?
AUD - DONE
BEC - DONE
REG - 04/04
FAR - 05/30March 25, 2015 at 12:06 am #677969
AnonymousInactiveI think it's D
March 25, 2015 at 12:15 am #677970
AnonymousInactiveRescheduled from May 1 at 12:30 pm to April 16 at 09:00 am. I know I still have some studying to do but I'm feeling a lot better than I did. May 1 was just too far out and I can't maintain this level of focus and intensity for that long of a period.
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 51’ is closed to new replies.
