- This topic has 3,544 replies, 143 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 3 months ago by falizadeh.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 5, 2015 at 8:08 pm #192517jeffKeymaster
Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.
“Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam
Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014
Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 8, 2015 at 3:25 am #677261HollyParticipant
@Kate 1-my understanding about the max contributions is the same as yours. 2-the coverdell distributions are tax free. I think what they're saying is technically you can get the benfit from the credits and also use your coverdell account. You could plan on using a combination where you could use the American opportunity credit for the first $2000 in expenses, then use coverdell for the remainder. 3-income taxes and self employment taxes are two different taxes. Half of the SE tax paid is an adjustment for AGI. Typically, your boss pays one half and the other half is deducted from your paycheck. When you're self employed you are the boss so you end up paying both parts of the social security and Medicare taxes.
BEC - 79
REG - 85
AUD - 5/27/16March 8, 2015 at 3:35 am #677262AnonymousInactiveWhat kind of study software is everyone using to help with REG. I despise taxes and have already taken REG 3 times! Last time I failed by 1 measly point and I really thought I was ready! Now I'm using Roger CPA Review. Roger energetic and presents the material in a clearer to understand way. I really like it! Here's hoping this time I will not only pass REG but pass it with flying colors!
March 8, 2015 at 3:47 am #677263March 8, 2015 at 3:55 am #677264KateMember@HRSexton thanks so much for the explanation.
Tom and Sally White, married and filing joint income tax returns, derive their entire income from the operation of their retail stationery shop. Their current year adjusted gross income was $100,000, and the Whites itemized their deductions on Schedule A. The following unreimbursed cash expenditures were among those made by the Whites during the year:
Repair and maintenance of motorized wheelchair for physically handicapped dependent child
$ 600
Tuition, meals, and lodging at special school for physically handicapped dependent child in an institution primarily for the availability of medical care, with meals and lodging furnished as necessary incidents to that care
8,000
Without regard to the adjusted gross income percentage threshold, what amount may the Whites claim in their current year return as qualifying medical expenses?
a.
$8,000
b.
$8,600
c.
$0
d.
$600
Explanation
Choice “b” is correct. Repair and maintenance of medical devices for a disabled dependent child ($600) are deductible medical expenses. The cost of a special school for a handicapped person in an institution primarily for the availability of medical care, when the meals and lodging are merely incident to that care ($8,000) is also a deductible medical expense.
Choice “a” is incorrect. Repair and maintenance of medical devices for a disabled dependent child are deductible medical expenses.
Choice “d” is incorrect. The cost of a special school for a handicapped person in an institution primarily for the availability of medical care, when the meals and lodging are merely incident to that care is a deductible medical expense.
Choice “c” is incorrect. Repair and maintenance of medical devices for a disabled dependent child are deductible medical expenses. The cost of a special school for a handicapped person in an institution primarily for the availability of medical care, when the meals and lodging are merely incident to that care is also a deductible medical expense.
I fell for the wrong answer and put $0 because I fell into the trap of thinking that Medical Expenses are not deductible until they reach > 10% of AGI. The reason why these are fully deductible is not clear to me– is it because they are 1) medical expenses for a dependent child? 2) they are medical expenses for someone who is disabled or 3) because it told us “without regard to the AGI percentage threshold?”
Just want to narrow down as to why this doesn't fall under the 10% AGI rule.
Thanks guys.
AUD (2/3/2015) Pass
REG (4/24/2015) Pass
FAR (8/3/2015) Pass
BEC (10/25/2015) PassMarch 8, 2015 at 3:56 am #677265KateMember@Chimeraboo– sorry that you haven't defeated REG but you sound so close so this time is definitely the time you will get that pass. Do you have any advice for someone taking REG for the first time? What software did you use before?
AUD (2/3/2015) Pass
REG (4/24/2015) Pass
FAR (8/3/2015) Pass
BEC (10/25/2015) PassMarch 8, 2015 at 3:07 am #677266HollyParticipant@Kate the last sentence in the facts say to disregard the threshold percentage.
BEC - 79
REG - 85
AUD - 5/27/16March 8, 2015 at 2:36 pm #677267AnonymousInactiveJust got my REG NTS this morning in my email. Hopefully it's the last NTS I ever need.
March 8, 2015 at 2:39 pm #677268BEACPAParticipantI know this was addressed to @Chimeraboo, but I thought I'd give my 2 cents.
One suggestion I'd make in studying reg is to avoid all of the minutia. It becomes so easy to get wrapped up in all of the details, such as phaseouts – because there are so many phaseouts. I personally believe spending time on phaseouts is a “waste” of time. Just be familiar with them.
With that said, there are a few phaseouts that other review courses suggest knowing. They are the mom & pop phaseout for “passive activity losses”, which is 150,000 and it's good to know the 2% itemized deductions vs the 10% itemized deductions. Also, there's the 7.5% for medical if a person is 65 or older.
I would stay focused on the big picture. I know it helps me to understand something in order to really learn it, but I didn't find a whole lot of logic with tax laws. So, I wouldn't spend too much if any time trying to figure out what the logic is for a C corporations basis. I'm sure someone could explain the logic and after awhile, if the logic is there, then you will eventually see it come to light – not by spending hours decoding the problem, but by repetition. The more problems you work through and the more you're exposed to the material, some things will just begin to stick. I wish you the very best!
@Chimeraboo, I'm interested in your thoughts as well. Have a great day!
FAR - 2/28/14 PASS Praise be to God!
AUD - 7/5/14 PASS Praise be to God!
BEC - 11/29/14PASS Praise be to God!
REG - 2/28/14 PASS Praise be to God!March 8, 2015 at 2:49 pm #677269AnonymousInactiveAlso a key to this exam, FAR and BEC. Read the stem of the question first on a calculation (the last sentence which is asking the actual question). You can avoid wasting a lot of time by knowing what the question is asking first so you can pick out the important details when you go back and read the rest of the question.
Also, remember, RTFQ. Read the freaking question (feel free to replace the F with other words of your choosing). AUD is really bad for this where a single word in the question will, completely, change what the correct answer is. But all exams will try to trip you up with words that change how the question should be answered.
March 8, 2015 at 3:33 pm #677270KateMember@BEACPA I appreciate any and all advice.
AUD (2/3/2015) Pass
REG (4/24/2015) Pass
FAR (8/3/2015) Pass
BEC (10/25/2015) PassMarch 8, 2015 at 4:12 pm #677271AnonymousInactiveFinished the lecture for C Corps and, knock on wood, it doesn't seem terrible. A lot of sticky points but I never took Corporate Tax in my master's program so I had it built up to be an invincible juggernaut. I really need to spend some time going through things again but at first glance, it doesn't seem nearly as bad as I was afraid of.
March 8, 2015 at 6:05 pm #677272hunter32MemberHey guys, I'm currently going through the AMT material (fun, I know). They mention that NOL's and Investment interest expense must be recomputed, but don't really go beyond that. Can anyone shed some light on this please? Thanks
BEC - 80 (Becker)
AUD - 92 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
FAR - 87 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
REG - 90 (Becker+NINJA MCQ and Audio)March 8, 2015 at 7:30 pm #677273GabeParticipantAttempting to wrap my head around M1 adjustments…for me, it's akin to cash to accrual, which I never truly grasped.
So…from what I have looked at,
if it is an expense and book is GREATER than financial, than it is an increase M1 adjustment?
e.g. Book expensed $30k of meals…but FS only expensed $15k…so it is a $15k increase
So, in other words, if it is not allowed on the FS, than add it back (for expenses)…sorry, just talking myself through this.
Anyone else have anything else to add/clarify?
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016March 8, 2015 at 8:15 pm #677274AnonymousInactiveGabe: I think that's pretty much it.
A non-taxable income would be subtracted from Book Income and a non-taxable expense would be added back to Book Income. So for the 30,000 in meals. We would add back $15,000 to get to taxable income.
Which reminds me of a related point. I don't think Becker has ever used the term but when I took Tax for my Master's, the 50% limitation on meals and entertainment expenses were referred to as the “cutback” I don't see the term cutback used in Becker but wanted to toss it out there if you see it on the exam or another test bank.
March 8, 2015 at 8:25 pm #677275 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 5’ is closed to new replies.