REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 198

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192517
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    “Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam

    Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 2,956 through 2,970 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #680184
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    i don't know what the # is, here is the question:

    Lane, a single taxpayer, received $160,000 in salary, $15,000 in income from an S corporation in which Lane does not materially participate, and a $35,000 passive loss from a real estate rental activity in which Lane materially participated. Lane's modified adjusted gross income was $165,000. What amount of the real estate rental activity loss was deductible?

    A.

    $0

    B.

    $15,000

    C.

    $25,000

    Incorrect D.

    $35,000

    and explanation

    Answer is 15,000 . Please note you can offset 25000 of rental property income which is a passive income with ordinary income. This is a exception but that is phased out

    Individuals may offset up to $25,000 ($50,000 if married filing jointly) of ordinary income with rental real estate activities. This exemption is reduced (but not below zero) by 50% of the amount by which the adjusted gross income of the taxpayer for the year exceeds $100,000.

    First, the passive activities were netted $15,000 from the S corporation – $35,000 from the rental = $(20,000).

    Second, the salary of $160,000 is decreased by the net $20,000 passive activity loss for a modified AGI before limitation of $140,000.

    Third, the amount of $140,000 that exceeds $100,000 is multiplied by 50%, equaling $20,000.

    Fourth, the rental loss of $35,000 is decreased by the $20,000 limitation, leaving an allowable deduction of $15,000.

    #680185
    jeff
    Keymaster
    #680186
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    No, I know what the answer is, but the explanation doesn't make sense.” the salary of $160,000 is decreased by the net $20,000 passive activity loss for a modified AGI before limitation of $140,000.” this is not right and everything after that.

    “Individuals may offset up to $25,000 ($50,000 if married filing jointly)” – this is also not right, there is no 50000 for mfj

    #680187
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    from Gleim:

    Lane, a single taxpayer, received $160,000 in salary, $15,000 in income from an S corporation in which Lane does not materially participate, and a $35,000 passive loss from a real estate rental activity in which Lane materially participated. Lane’s modified adjusted gross income was $165,000. What amount of the real estate rental activity loss was deductible?

    A. $0

    B. $25,000

    C. $15,000

    Answer (C) is correct.

    The amount of a loss attributable to a person’s passive activities is allowable as a deduction or credit only against, and to the extent of, gross income or tax attributable to those passive activities. All rental activity is passive, but a person who actively participates in a rental real estate activity is entitled to deduct up to $25,000 of losses from the passive activity from other than passive income. However, this exception of the general passive activity loss limitation rule is completely phased out when the taxpayer has modified adjusted gross income of at least $150,000. Although Lane actively participated in the rental real estate activity, Lane’s modified adjusted gross income exceeded $150,000, so she can only deduct passive activity losses against passive activity income. Lane had passive activity income from an S corporation of $15,000 and can therefore only deduct $15,000 of the real estate rental activity loss.

    D. $35,000

    #680188
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    what is bothering from Gleim explanation though is this:

    Although Lane ACTIVELY participated in the rental real estate activity, Lane’s modified adjusted gross income exceeded $150,000, so she can only deduct passive activity losses against passive activity income.

    the question states: from a real estate rental activity in which Lane MATERIALLY participated, not ACTIVELY

    #680189
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I will look at it…my brain isn't working yet on this Sunday morning.

    The $50k MFJ is in the IRS instructions: https://www.irs.gov/file_source/pub/irs-pdf/i8582.pdf

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

    #680190
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    honestly, i don't see 50000, only in context of AGI limit for MFS

    Exception

    You actively participated in rental real

    estate activities (see Special Allowance

    for Rental Real Estate Activities, later),

    and you meet all of the following

    conditions.

    Rental real estate activities with

    active participation were your only

    passive activities.

    You have no prior year unallowed

    losses from these (or any other passive)

    activities.

    Your total loss from the rental real

    estate activities was not more than

    $25,000 ($12,500 if married filing

    separately).

    If you are married filing separately,

    you lived apart from your spouse all

    year.

    You have no current or prior year

    unallowed credits from a passive

    activity.

    Your modified adjusted gross income

    (see the instructions for line 7, later) was

    not more than $100,000 (not more than

    $50,000 if married filing separately).

    You do not hold any interest in a

    rental real estate activity as a limited

    partner or as a beneficiary of an estate

    or a trust.

    If all the above conditions are met,

    your rental real estate losses are not

    limited, and you do not need to

    complete Form 8582. Enter losses

    reported on Schedule E (Form 1040),

    Supplemental Income and Loss, Part I,

    line 21, on Schedule E (Form 1040),

    Part l, line 22. For losses from a

    partnership or an S corporation, enter

    the amount of the allowable loss from

    Schedule K-1 in Schedule E (Form

    1040), Part II, column (f). Enter losses

    reported on line 32 of Form 4835, Farm

    Rental Income and Expenses, on Form

    4835, line 34c.

    #680191
    RTCPA
    Member

    hi

    why we didn't consider the land FMV since ED is having more than 80% of the stocks?

    Ed, the sole stockholder of Looney Corp., paid $70,000 for Looney’s stock in 2010. During 2015, Ed contributed a parcel of land to Looney but was not given any additional stock for this contribution. Ed’s basis for the land was $5,000, and its fair market value was $15,000 on the date of the transfer of title. What is Ed’s adjusted basis for his Looney stock following the contribution of the parcel of land?

    $75,000

    This answer is correct. The requirement is to determine Ed’s stock basis following the contribution of a parcel of land to his solely owned corporation. When a shareholder makes a contribution to the capital of a corporation, no gain or loss is recognized to the shareholder, the corporation has a transferred (carryover) basis for the property, and the shareholder’s original stock basis is increased by the adjusted basis of the additional property contributed. Here, Ed’s beginning stock basis of $70,000 is increased by the $5,000 basis for the contributed land, resulting in a stock basis of $75,000.

    #680192
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    in fact page 3-4

    The maximum special allowance is:

    $25,000 for single individuals and

    married individuals filing a joint return for

    the tax year.

    Instructions for Form 8582 (2014) ­3­

    Page 4 of 14 Fileid: … ions/I8582/2014/A/XML/Cycle06/source 17:13 – 6-Mar-2015

    The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing.

    $12,500 for married individuals who

    file separate returns for the tax year and

    lived apart from their spouses at all

    times during the tax year.

    $25,000 for a qualifying estate

    reduced by the special allowance for

    which the surviving spouse qualified.

    #680193
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Hmmm – you're correct. I was scanning the doc, found the number, and tending to a 2 year old who wanted Cheerios all at the same time.

    I'll dig into the answer explanation.

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

    #680194
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    well thanks to this question I guess passive loss limitation is committed to my long term memory now

    #680195

    Such a badly worded question.

    For an offering to be exempt under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, Rule 505 and Rule 506 each require which of the following?

    A.

    The SEC be notified within 10 days of the first sale

    B.

    The offering be made without general advertising

    C.

    All accredited investors receive the issuer’s financial information

    D.

    There be a maximum of 35 investors

    Though i know the answer is B , still under rule 506 they can solicit and advertise accrdited investors

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #680196
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    is it C? i don't really get what they are asking though

    I don't think any advertisement allowed for 505 or 506, only for 504

    edit: ok i see, it's b

    #680197

    Under 506 advertisement is allowed for accredited investors

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #680198
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    are you sure? not according to my notes

Viewing 15 replies - 2,956 through 2,970 (of 3,544 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 198’ is closed to new replies.