- This topic has 3,544 replies, 143 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 2 months ago by
falizadeh.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 5, 2015 at 8:08 pm #192517
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 24, 2015 at 1:20 pm #680184
AnonymousInactivei don't know what the # is, here is the question:
Lane, a single taxpayer, received $160,000 in salary, $15,000 in income from an S corporation in which Lane does not materially participate, and a $35,000 passive loss from a real estate rental activity in which Lane materially participated. Lane's modified adjusted gross income was $165,000. What amount of the real estate rental activity loss was deductible?
A.
$0
B.
$15,000
C.
$25,000
Incorrect D.
$35,000
and explanation
Answer is 15,000 . Please note you can offset 25000 of rental property income which is a passive income with ordinary income. This is a exception but that is phased out
Individuals may offset up to $25,000 ($50,000 if married filing jointly) of ordinary income with rental real estate activities. This exemption is reduced (but not below zero) by 50% of the amount by which the adjusted gross income of the taxpayer for the year exceeds $100,000.
First, the passive activities were netted $15,000 from the S corporation – $35,000 from the rental = $(20,000).
Second, the salary of $160,000 is decreased by the net $20,000 passive activity loss for a modified AGI before limitation of $140,000.
Third, the amount of $140,000 that exceeds $100,000 is multiplied by 50%, equaling $20,000.
Fourth, the rental loss of $35,000 is decreased by the $20,000 limitation, leaving an allowable deduction of $15,000.
May 24, 2015 at 1:30 pm #680185
jeffKeymasterMay 24, 2015 at 1:36 pm #680186
AnonymousInactiveNo, I know what the answer is, but the explanation doesn't make sense.” the salary of $160,000 is decreased by the net $20,000 passive activity loss for a modified AGI before limitation of $140,000.” this is not right and everything after that.
“Individuals may offset up to $25,000 ($50,000 if married filing jointly)” – this is also not right, there is no 50000 for mfj
May 24, 2015 at 1:39 pm #680187
AnonymousInactivefrom Gleim:
Lane, a single taxpayer, received $160,000 in salary, $15,000 in income from an S corporation in which Lane does not materially participate, and a $35,000 passive loss from a real estate rental activity in which Lane materially participated. Lane’s modified adjusted gross income was $165,000. What amount of the real estate rental activity loss was deductible?
A. $0
B. $25,000
C. $15,000
Answer (C) is correct.
The amount of a loss attributable to a person’s passive activities is allowable as a deduction or credit only against, and to the extent of, gross income or tax attributable to those passive activities. All rental activity is passive, but a person who actively participates in a rental real estate activity is entitled to deduct up to $25,000 of losses from the passive activity from other than passive income. However, this exception of the general passive activity loss limitation rule is completely phased out when the taxpayer has modified adjusted gross income of at least $150,000. Although Lane actively participated in the rental real estate activity, Lane’s modified adjusted gross income exceeded $150,000, so she can only deduct passive activity losses against passive activity income. Lane had passive activity income from an S corporation of $15,000 and can therefore only deduct $15,000 of the real estate rental activity loss.
D. $35,000
May 24, 2015 at 1:42 pm #680188
AnonymousInactivewhat is bothering from Gleim explanation though is this:
Although Lane ACTIVELY participated in the rental real estate activity, Lane’s modified adjusted gross income exceeded $150,000, so she can only deduct passive activity losses against passive activity income.
the question states: from a real estate rental activity in which Lane MATERIALLY participated, not ACTIVELY
May 24, 2015 at 1:42 pm #680189
jeffKeymasterI will look at it…my brain isn't working yet on this Sunday morning.
The $50k MFJ is in the IRS instructions: https://www.irs.gov/file_source/pub/irs-pdf/i8582.pdf
May 24, 2015 at 1:46 pm #680190
AnonymousInactivehonestly, i don't see 50000, only in context of AGI limit for MFS
Exception
You actively participated in rental real
estate activities (see Special Allowance
for Rental Real Estate Activities, later),
and you meet all of the following
conditions.
Rental real estate activities with
active participation were your only
passive activities.
You have no prior year unallowed
losses from these (or any other passive)
activities.
Your total loss from the rental real
estate activities was not more than
$25,000 ($12,500 if married filing
separately).
If you are married filing separately,
you lived apart from your spouse all
year.
You have no current or prior year
unallowed credits from a passive
activity.
Your modified adjusted gross income
(see the instructions for line 7, later) was
not more than $100,000 (not more than
$50,000 if married filing separately).
You do not hold any interest in a
rental real estate activity as a limited
partner or as a beneficiary of an estate
or a trust.
If all the above conditions are met,
your rental real estate losses are not
limited, and you do not need to
complete Form 8582. Enter losses
reported on Schedule E (Form 1040),
Supplemental Income and Loss, Part I,
line 21, on Schedule E (Form 1040),
Part l, line 22. For losses from a
partnership or an S corporation, enter
the amount of the allowable loss from
Schedule K-1 in Schedule E (Form
1040), Part II, column (f). Enter losses
reported on line 32 of Form 4835, Farm
Rental Income and Expenses, on Form
4835, line 34c.
May 24, 2015 at 1:47 pm #680191
RTCPAMemberhi
why we didn't consider the land FMV since ED is having more than 80% of the stocks?
Ed, the sole stockholder of Looney Corp., paid $70,000 for Looney’s stock in 2010. During 2015, Ed contributed a parcel of land to Looney but was not given any additional stock for this contribution. Ed’s basis for the land was $5,000, and its fair market value was $15,000 on the date of the transfer of title. What is Ed’s adjusted basis for his Looney stock following the contribution of the parcel of land?
$75,000
This answer is correct. The requirement is to determine Ed’s stock basis following the contribution of a parcel of land to his solely owned corporation. When a shareholder makes a contribution to the capital of a corporation, no gain or loss is recognized to the shareholder, the corporation has a transferred (carryover) basis for the property, and the shareholder’s original stock basis is increased by the adjusted basis of the additional property contributed. Here, Ed’s beginning stock basis of $70,000 is increased by the $5,000 basis for the contributed land, resulting in a stock basis of $75,000.
May 24, 2015 at 1:47 pm #680192
AnonymousInactivein fact page 3-4
The maximum special allowance is:
$25,000 for single individuals and
married individuals filing a joint return for
the tax year.
Instructions for Form 8582 (2014) 3
Page 4 of 14 Fileid: … ions/I8582/2014/A/XML/Cycle06/source 17:13 – 6-Mar-2015
The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing.
$12,500 for married individuals who
file separate returns for the tax year and
lived apart from their spouses at all
times during the tax year.
$25,000 for a qualifying estate
reduced by the special allowance for
which the surviving spouse qualified.
May 24, 2015 at 2:27 pm #680193
jeffKeymasterMay 24, 2015 at 2:37 pm #680194
AnonymousInactivewell thanks to this question I guess passive loss limitation is committed to my long term memory now
May 24, 2015 at 3:00 pm #680195
willpassby2014MemberSuch a badly worded question.
For an offering to be exempt under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, Rule 505 and Rule 506 each require which of the following?
A.
The SEC be notified within 10 days of the first sale
B.
The offering be made without general advertising
C.
All accredited investors receive the issuer’s financial information
D.
There be a maximum of 35 investors
Though i know the answer is B , still under rule 506 they can solicit and advertise accrdited investors
BEC Passed
FAR Passed
AUD Passed
REG PassedMay 24, 2015 at 3:05 pm #680196
AnonymousInactiveis it C? i don't really get what they are asking though
I don't think any advertisement allowed for 505 or 506, only for 504
edit: ok i see, it's b
May 24, 2015 at 3:16 pm #680197
willpassby2014MemberUnder 506 advertisement is allowed for accredited investors
BEC Passed
FAR Passed
AUD Passed
REG PassedMay 24, 2015 at 3:23 pm #680198
AnonymousInactiveare you sure? not according to my notes
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 198’ is closed to new replies.
