REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 191

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192517
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    “Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam

    Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 2,851 through 2,865 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #680076

    Anna, you are right. Items subject to tax benefit rule. I have another doubt if you can clarify.

    Passive Income; Portfolio income are not counted as income on Schedule K. But we have to add them to arrive at partnership basis. Am i correct ? I dont seem to have that in my note

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #680077
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    that's my understanding, yes. I keep this in my bookmarks https://www.irs.gov/publications/p541/ar02.html#en_US_201312_publink1000104289

    #680078

    This is so cool. Thankyou

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #680079

    During 2013, Adams, a general contractor, Brinks, an architect, and Carson, an interior decorator, formed the Dex Home Improvement General Partnership by contributing the assets below.

    Asset Adjusted basis Fair market value % of partner share in capital, profits & losses

    Adams Cash $40,000 $40,000 50%

    Brinks Land $12,000 $21,000 20%

    Carson Inventory $24,000 $24,000 30%

    The land was a capital asset to Brinks, subject to a $5,000 mortgage, which was assumed by the partnership.

    For items 1 and 2, determine and select the initial basis of the partner's interest in Dex.

    OK. I AM MISSING BIG TIME. THE FIRST ONE IS SIMPLE. SECOND ONE HOW HE IS SAYING 25,500? I THOUGHT INITIAL BASIS IS THE PARTNERS ADJUSTED BASIS.

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #680080
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Is Carson item 2? Add his share of liability

    #680081
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So what should I be getting on the Becker practice tests to expect to pass the REG exam?

    When I did an overall 90 question test on chapters 1 – 7, I got a 72%. I've got 5 study days, and haven't even finished chapter 8 yet! (Let alone a good review.) 🙁

    #680082
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I didn't think I would have a problem with gift exclusion but I do

    A husband and wife agree to split monetary gifts to their relatives. The husband gives his daughter $24,500, and the wife gives her niece $21,000. The annual exclusion is $14,000. What amount is the taxable gift for the husband and wife?

    A. $17,500

    B. $0

    C. $45,500

    D. $21,000

    #680083
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It's 17,500. The annual exclusion is 28,000 for a couple.

    #680084
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    well not according to gleim. I hope this is an error ?

    Answer (B) is correct.

    Gift splitting allows married taxpayers to effectively double the amount of the gift tax exclusion by using both exclusions available to the couple. If the annual exclusion is $14,000, the couple will have a $28,000 gift tax exclusion per recipient. Since both gifts to separate recipients are below $28,000, there is no taxable gift.

    #680085
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    That is true! Sorry…glad I read this. Just read about it on the IRS site. It's $28k per recipient.

    #680086
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I… can't wrap my head around it lol. I just saw almost the exact question in aicpa released questions and also got it wrong

    #680087
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Think of it as…Jill is single and can gifts of up to $14k tax free to different individuals. Well now Jack and Jill are married, and each of them can give up to $14k tax free to different individuals. Some of those individuals may overlap, and that's okay. Does that make any sense? lol

    #680088
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Where do you see aicpa released questions?

    #680089
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks, I guess I see that, there are 4 exclusions total. But why is this confusing

    #680090
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ninja and Roger has them too

Viewing 15 replies - 2,851 through 2,865 (of 3,544 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 191’ is closed to new replies.