REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 183

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192517
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    “Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam

    Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 2,731 through 2,745 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #679956
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    In relation to the above question, this is what the Gleim book says:

    The illegality of duties to be performed by an agent automatically ends the agency. EXAMPLE: An agency has been formed in which the agent is expected to sell the principal's real estate. If the agent fails to obtain a real estate license, the agency is void. An unlicensed agent cannot legally sell real estate for the principal.

    Does anyone have anything to contribute to the question? Do you agree with my answer (D) or Ninja's answer (C)?

    #679957
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    No I am convinced it's d, must be a mistake

    #679958
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Many thanks, Anna!

    #679959
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    That question has popped up a few times. Different review courses offer different answers too.

    D. not liable to West for any amount because West violated the Kansas licensing requirements.

    That's the one I would focus on. That focuses on the most important issue of the question. If someone represents themselves as a CPA, Real Estate Agent, Lawyer, etc but does not actually have that license, then no contract is invalid. I'm not sure if it's void, voidable or whatever but because the person doesn't possess the legal credentials that they claim, that person will lose in court every time.

    That's what I would know for that question.

    Also, piece of advice. Don't get hung up on one question. Some of the BLaw questions go so deep into the weeds that you'll make your head spin. If you can't wrap your head around a single question, just move on.

    #679960
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thank you, Angelwatch. Yes, I learned with AUD you just have to let some questions go. I've run into a few since I started supplementing Gleim with Ninja over this past weekend and I want to make sure that when I think that I have a solid understanding of a concept and the MCQ says otherwise that I do in fact have a solid understanding. Sometimes, I read the answer explanations and see WHY I was wrong, or I see that my answer choice right but for a different reason than I thought. 🙂

    Gleim allows you to submit when you believe a question is wrong or misleading, or if you need additional assistance. For $40, I certainly don't expect individual one-on-one assistance from Ninja, but is there a way to submit “wrong” questions?

    #679961
    Kemi22
    Participant

    Seems easy enough:

    The Tuition and Fees Deduction was set to expire at the end of 2011, but has been extended again through 2014.

    So is this deductible or not, if it shows up on the exam?

    2010:
    BEC: 74, 71, 74, 75
    AUD: 71, 74, 83
    REG: 71, 76
    FAR: (I quit) 34, 45

    2015:
    BEC: 79
    AUD: 78
    REG: 67, 76
    FAR: 56 (trial run), 74, 74, 74, 80!
    Thank God. Your prayers are always answered! Do not give up. Thank you St. Joseph Cupertino.

    #679962

    HUH – I NEVER KNEW THAT…..HOW DID I MISS TO STUDY THIS

    Gibson purchased stock with a fair market value of $14,000 from Gibson's adult child for $12,000. The child's cost basis in the stock at the date of sale was $16,000. Gibson sold the same stock to an unrelated party for $18,000. What is Gibson's recognized gain from the sale?

    A.

    $0

    B.

    $2,000

    C.

    $4,000

    D.

    $6,000

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #679963
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Here is another one for you

    On March 1 of the previous year, a parent sold stock with a cost of $8,000 to their child for $6,000, its fair market value. On September 30 of the current year, the child sold the same stock for $7,000 to Hancock, who is unrelated to the parent and child. What is the proper treatment for these transactions?

    A. Parent has a $2,000 recognized loss and child has $1,000 recognized gain.

    B. Parent has $2,000 recognized loss and child has $0 recognized gain.

    C. Parent has $0 recognized loss and child has $0 recognized gain.

    Answer (C) is correct.

    With a related party stock sale, the original related seller is not permitted to recognize any realized loss on the disposition. However, if the recipient of that stock subsequently disposes of it at a gain, they are permitted to reduce any gain realized by the amount of the disallowed loss. In this case, $2,000 ($6,000 amount realized, less $8,000 adjusted basis) of loss is realized to the parent on the initial disposition. The child takes a $6,000 fair market value basis. Upon subsequent disposition, the child realizes a $1,000 gain on the sale of the shares ($7,000 amount realized, less $6,000 adjusted basis). However, this is reduced to $0 by the disallowed loss to the parent. The remaining $1,000 loss ($2,000 disallowed loss, less $1,000 used to offset the child’s gain) is permanently lost.

    D. Parent has $0 recognized loss and child has $1,000 recognized gain.

    #679964

    Oh my god…..i would have definitely lost this question if i got it in the exam….i am getting scared now

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #679965

    I WANT TO CHECK IF SOMEONE THOUGHT LIKE ME OR AM I THE ONLY DUMB?

    Alex Barbone inherited his mother's house when she died in 2013. The value of the house was $450,000 at the time of death, based on actual sales in the city. Her original basis in the house was $26,000 and she had lived there for 44 years. Alex had not lived in the house except for short visits. Alex paid $6,000 for taxes, insurance, and utilities for the next year. He also was advised by his real estate agent to spend $18,000 on maintenance and repairs, which he did. Unfortunately, the local market suffered a loss of 12% in the average sales price of houses. Alex was finally able to sell the house in 2014 for $396,000, net of commissions and sales costs. What is the capital loss or gain on the sale of the house?

    A.

    $100,000 gain

    B.

    $54,000 loss

    C.

    $60,000 loss

    D.

    $78,000 loss

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #679966
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    is it D? I am not sure

    #679967
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Willpassby2014, those related party sales are common, so definitely brush up on them. They're not too bad once you know the rules.

    As for your most recent question, B? In inheritance, basis doesnt matter, only FMV at death or the alternate date (6 months later) if elected. So in this case, $450 basis. Taxes, utilities, maintenance, and repairs are expensed and can't increase basis, so it's just 450 – 396 = 54. All the other info about basis, how long she lived there, etc, is to throw you off. Pretty sure, but not 100%. Is the answer not provided?

    #679968
    Tncincy
    Participant

    I'm guessing B

    It begins with a 75
    Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to pass

    #679969
    Tncincy
    Participant

    answer posted before my answer but I subtracted the value at time of death and selling price.

    It begins with a 75
    Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to pass

    #679970

    I also answered B but the answer is D. I am not sure if we have to add taxes, repairs and maintenance. Do they increase the value of the asset? Below is the explanation

    The first key to this question is that Alex never lived in the house, meaning it had never been his residence. The second key is that Alex receives the house at the value when his mother died, reported at $450,000. Since he did not live there, the house was the same as a property held for sale or rent. All of the expenses paid by Alex are deductible against the sale of the house. The 12% decline in value meant a difference of $54,000 between the basis Alex received and the price received on sale ($450,000 – $396,000 = $54,000 loss). Additional costs paid in cash by Alex were $6,000 for taxes, insurance, and utilities, and $18,000 for maintenance and repairs. These three items resulted in a loss for tax purposes of $78,000 ($54,000 + $6,000 + $18,000 = $78,000).

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

Viewing 15 replies - 2,731 through 2,745 (of 3,544 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 183’ is closed to new replies.