REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 176

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192517
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    “Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam

    Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 2,626 through 2,640 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #679851
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Sand orally promised Frost a $10,000 bonus, in addition to a monthly salary, if Frost would work two

    years for Sand. If Frost works for the two years, will the statute of frauds prevent Frost from collecting

    the bonus?

    A. No, because Frost fully performed

    B. No, because the contract did not involve an interest in real estate

    C. Yes, because the contract could not be performed within one year

    D. Yes, because the monthly salary was the consideration of the contract

    How this doesn't fall under the statute of frauds? I thought Frost having to work for two years implies that the contract cannot be performed within one year?

    #679852

    In April, A and B formed X Corp. A contributed $50,000 cash and B contributed land worth $70,000 (with an adjusted basis of $40,000). B also received $20,000 cash from the corporation. A and B each received 50% of the corporation's stock. What is the tax basis of the land to X Corp.?

    A.

    $40,000

    B.

    $50,000

    C.

    $60,000

    D.

    $70,000

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #679853
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    C?

    #679854

    Yes. you are right.

    Transferor's Basis

    + Gain recognized by shareholder=0

    = Basis

    is that how you calculated?

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #679855

    Dole, the sole owner of Enson Corp., transferred a building to Enson. The building had an adjusted tax basis of $35,000 and a fair market value of $100,000. In exchange for the building, Dole received $40,000 cash and Enson common stock with a fair market value of $60,000. What amount of gain did Dole recognize?

    A. $0

    B. $5,000

    C. $40,000

    D. $65,000

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #679856
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ugh I don't know, these are confusing. 40000?

    #679857

    The answer is 60,000. No gain is recognized if you contribute property for exchange of shares only (80% rule). If you receive cash or any other property then gain is recognized lesser of

    Realized gain – which is 70,000-40000= 30,000 or cash received which is 20,000

    So 40,000+20,000=60,000

    FOR THE SECOND QUESTION THE ANSWER IS 40,000.

    IT IS TRANSFEROR BASIS + GAIN RECOGNIZED BY SH = 40,000+0= 40,000

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #679858
    RTCPA
    Member

    hi

    can any one help me with the bellow:

    Harold, an unmarried taxpayer, purchased a home in a suburb of Chicago on October , 2011. Eighteen months later his employer transferred him to St. Louis and Harold sold his home for a gain of $200,000. Since Harold sold his home because of a change in place of employment and had owned and used the home as a principal residence for eighteen months, the exclusion of his gain is limited to $250,000 × 18/24 = $187,500.

    2 questions : a – if the sales was because of employment why we had to pro rata

    b – gain is only 200,000 why the calculation was based on 250,000

    thnx

    #679859
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    An S corporation had the following income and expenses:

    Sales

    $240,000

    Rent expense

    25,000

    Entertainment expense

    5,000

    Interest income

    1,500

    Contributions to qualifying charities

    600

    Section 179 expense

    3,000

    Depreciation expense

    1,800

    What would be reported as ordinary income on the corporation's income tax return?

    A. $206,100

    B. $208,600

    C. $210,700

    D. $213,200

    I'm a bit confused with P/Ships and S-corps if you include interest income or not. I always thought you disregarded the interest income for both entities because they are reported separately on the individual's k1. edit: nevermind I can't math. Correct answer is C.

    #679860
    No_one
    Member

    @RTCPA here my 2 cents..

    If Iam not wrong Person need to stay in the house 2 out of 5 years. and Here he is single, so i guess max gain you can claim is 250000/- and MFJ 500000/- (Correct me if I am wrong)

    I am not sure about the Pro rata rule (haven't revised yet) So hopefully somebody else from the group can explain better..

    CA Candidate
    FAR: You are down...
    Aud: Surprised me...Thanks
    BEC: 75% work done
    REG: It's 80 but I am 100% done 🙂

    #679861
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    RTCPA,

    yes, the amount of the exclusion is prorated, not the amount of gain. Normally you'd have to live in the house 2 years out of 5 previous years to be qualified for the exclusion, but there are exceptions when you can prorate it. Work, health, something else

    #679862
    jstay
    Participant

    oh wow…

    ill be here in july with you guys, thats for sure

    #679863
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    why, how was it?

    #679864
    jstay
    Participant

    a mess!

    sims were pretty freaking hard. pretty sure i got research so thats one in my favor. 2 other sims im pretty sure i got 75+ on them, maybe even higher but idk. one of them i either got 100 or 0, lol it wsa hard to figure what they were asking. another i feel “ok” on. then one was just guesses, i knew the concepts but who knows.

    the mcq were alright, some were like WTF and others i knew right away.

    12 days..

    ill probably start studying again next Friday just because

    #679865
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    that doesn't sound bad at all actually. Well let's hope

Viewing 15 replies - 2,626 through 2,640 (of 3,544 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 176’ is closed to new replies.