REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 162

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192517
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    “Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam

    Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 2,416 through 2,430 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #679641
    jstay
    Participant

    @anjanja i think depreciation is one

    #679642
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I have no flipping clue!

    #679643
    jstay
    Participant

    @tgwadez, heres a partnership problem to try

    Hart's adjusted basis in Best Partnership was $9,000 at the time he received the following nonliquidating distributions of partnership property:

    Cash

    $5,000

    Land

    Adjusted basis

    7,000

    Fair market value

    10,000

    What was the amount of Hart's basis in the land?

    a.

    $0

    b.

    $10,000

    c.

    $7,000

    d.

    $4,000

    #679644
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    but is answer A? For AMT question?

    #679645
    jstay
    Participant

    Stone's basis in Ace Partnership was $70,000 at the time he received a nonliquidating distribution of partnership capital assets. These capital assets had an adjusted basis of $65,000 to Ace and a fair market value of $83,000. Ace had no unrealized receivables, appreciated inventory, or properties that had been contributed by its partners. What was Stone's recognized gain or loss on the distribution?

    a.

    $13,000 capital gain.

    b.

    $5,000 capital loss.

    c.

    $18,000 ordinary income.

    d.

    $0.

    #679646
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    both questions D?

    #679647
    jstay
    Participant

    i think it was C, an exclusion item.

    #679648
    jstay
    Participant

    yes anjanja both are D

    #679649
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @jstay both answers are D

    @anj AMT question the answer was C

    #679650
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    well at least i got partnerships, sort of

    #679651

    Guys

    Under the Sales Article of the U.C.C., which of the following events will result in the risk of loss passing from a merchant seller to a buyer?

    Tender of the goods at the seller's place of business

    Use of the seller's truck to deliver the goods

    A.

    Both I and II

    B.

    I only

    C.

    II only

    D.

    Neither I nor II

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #679652
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The best I can come up with, using GAAP/tax differences as a reference point, is that a deferral item is something like installment sales, payments collected in advance, depreciation, or % of completion contracts, all of which are treated differently for GAAP and tax, but will reverse over time and equal each other. Recognition is simply “deferred.”

    Exclusion items are recognized for either GAAP/tax and not recognized for the other. Examples of these would be municipal bond interest income (completely excluded for tax purposes, but always included for GAAP), federal income tax (always included in GI for tax, expensed for GAAP), etc. As for “exemption” items, that sounds kind of like a distractor. There is an exemption for AMT, with phase outs for different filing statuses. The best answer for the state refund deduction is that it is excluded; we don't get to take that reduction in AMT – it is added back.

    Sounds counterintuitive because added back and excluded have opposite meanings. For regular tax, we get to deduct state tax refunds as an itemized deduction; for AMT, they are an add back (The T in Becker's PANIC TIMME pneumonic). Since we “add” them back for AMT, they can be thought of as an “exclusion” item in terms of regular tax…we no longer get to exclude them from regular tax.

    If this makes no sense, ignore it…AMT is so weird. I am hoping the questions are simple like they have been in Becker.

    #679653
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    willpassby2014

    I'd say B, i just watched the lecture but still not sure

    #679654

    I also answered B and i was wrong. Answer is D

    • When the seller is a merchant, the risk of loss passes from the merchant seller to the buyer upon the buyer's actual receipt of the goods. (If the seller had been a nonmerchant, risk of loss would have passed upon “tender of delivery.”) Although in a “shipment” contract risk of loss passes to the buyer as soon as the seller delivers the goods to a carrier, this rule would not be applicable in this case since the seller delivered the goods in his own truck.

    • In a noncarrier case, risk of losses passes from a merchant seller on actual delivery of the goods into the buyer's possession. Mere tender at the seller's place of business does not pass the risk. Neither does the seller using its truck to deliver the goods. (Note that since the seller is using its own truck, this is a noncarrier case—no common carrier was involved.)

    • Since the seller is a merchant, risk of loss passes when the buyer takes actual physical possession of the goods. Therefore, neither the tender of the goods at the seller's place of business nor use of the seller's truck to deliver the goods is an event that transfers risk of loss to the buyer, as the merchant seller still retains possession of the goods.

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #679655
    jstay
    Participant

    @willpassby D neither, Merchant Seller needs to have buyer actually accept goods not just tender (thats non merchant) and the second choice was just weird..is it D though

Viewing 15 replies - 2,416 through 2,430 (of 3,544 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 162’ is closed to new replies.