REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 16

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192517
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    “Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam

    Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

Viewing 15 replies - 226 through 240 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #677427
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @gabe for like-kind exchanges you are correct. for something like section 351 exchanges the mortgage is not considered boot for recognized gain. it only affects the basis.

    edit: there is one little thing though with like-kind exhanges: if u are exchanging property and the one your giving up has a 100k mortgage and the one ur getting has 125k mortgage but they give u 25k cash to offset the difference, that 25k cash cant be netted against the 125k to make them both 100k. u will have to recognize that 25k cash. its under reg 1.1031(d)-2, something about not being able to net excess mortgage

    #677428
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @workhard thanks I think I have a good plan going. My 69 was 4 weeks of studying+class+recruiting season. So I think I can do it! So far it hasn't been to bad and I'm getting the mcq correct on the first try. I did start with r5 then I will do blaw after. And go back and do the tax portion r1-4. That seems to be a good decision that a few people are doing here.

    #677429
    Holly
    Participant

    Does anyone know why the answer is -$400? It's Becker, R4, Simulation 2, Task 4 and they're wanting basis calculation of one of the partners after a year's worth of transactions. Included in the transactions is the annual life insurance premiums for both partners of $1600 and the partnership is the beneficiary. I thought the reduction to basis would be $800 per partner, but the solution's explanation was it would be 50% of the $800, which is $400. Meaning that the reduction of basis would be half (400) of half (800) of the total $1600 premium. Can anyone explain this?

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #677430
    Gabe
    Participant

    Laura- you GOT this!

    HR- I don't have Becker, can you provide more info? Or can anyone else shed some light?

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #677431
    okcpa2015
    Participant

    This might be a silly question, and I might have just confused myself, but C-Corps can't have passive income, just S-Corps correct?

    FAR - 91
    REG - 88
    AUD - 98
    BEC - 88

    #677432
    Peterman25
    Participant

    @ok

    are you confusing passive and flow-through? I think of passive income as portfolio income. why wouldn't they have that type of income? and then isn't portfolio income separately stated for a flow-through entity so that it can be reported by the separate individuals on k-1s?

    BEC 7/14 - PASS
    FAR 10/14 - PASS
    AUD 1/15 - PASS
    REG 4/15 - PASS

    AZ license - Official 8/20/2015

    #677433
    okcpa2015
    Participant

    I do know that Passive Income and Portfolio income are mutually exclusive.

    Passive income is rental activities and business in which a taxpayer does not materially participate (like a limited partnership).

    FAR - 91
    REG - 88
    AUD - 98
    BEC - 88

    #677434
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Gabe and HR, here's the complete info for Becker R4 Sim2 Task4 copied/pasted below:

    Scroll down to complete all parts of the task.

    During years 1 and 2, Smith and Parker were equal partners in the ABC Partnership, a computer technology business involving web site design and computer hardware repair. At start-up of the ABC Partnership on January 1, Year 1, Smith and Parker each contributed $50,000 in cash.

    During Year 1, Smith and Parker each contributed an additional $15,000 and received distributions of $2,000 each.

    ABC Partnership reports the following items during Year 1:

    Item Year 1

    Ordinary income from trade or business activities as reported on Schedule K of the partnership return for allocation to the partners $46,000

    Interest income 1,400

    Life insurance premiums paid on lives of partners (partnership is beneficiary) 1,600

    Penalties paid for late payment of payroll taxes 200

    Guaranteed payment to Parker 10,000

    Purchase of land for investment 6,000

    Use the table below to determine Smith's tax basis in the partnership interest at the end of year 1. Not all entries may be needed for the determination. For any item not needed, enter a zero (0). Decreases in tax basis should be shown as negative values.

    Smiths' beginning tax basis $50,000

    Ordinary income from trade or business activities

    Interest income

    Life insurance premiums paid on lives of partners (partnership is beneficiary)

    Penalties paid for late payment of payroll taxes

    Guaranteed payment to Parker

    Additional capital contributions

    Distributions

    Purchase of land for investment

    Smiths' tax basis at end of year $50,000

    #677435
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Here's the solution for the above:

    3. Ordinary Income: $23,000

    Smith's 50% portion of the $46,000 ordinary income given.

    4. Interest income: $700

    Smith's 50% portion of the $1,400 interest income given.

    5. Life Insurance Premiums: $(400)

    Smith's 50% portion of the $800 life insurance premiums paid. This is a non deductible expense, but does reduce the partners' basis.

    6. Penalties paid on late payment of payroll taxes: $(100)

    Smith's 50% portion of the $200 penalties paid. This is a non deductible expense, but does reduce a partner's basis.

    7. Guaranteed Payment to Parker: $0

    The entire amount is allocated to Parker. None of this is allocated to Smith. So it will not affect Smith's basis.

    8. Additional Capital Contributions: $15,000

    This amount is given in the facts.

    9. Distributions: $(2,000)

    This amount is given in the facts.

    10. Purchase of Land for Investment: $0

    The purchase of an asset does not affect the income of the partnership and has no effect on a partner's basis.

    #677436
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I am feeling like a complete idiot every step of the way.

    In context of ACE adjustments for calculating AMT, what's excess depreciation on personal property? Why is there personal property in corporation? Who is that person?

    #677437
    Holly
    Participant

    @anjanja Personal Property (Machinery and Equipment) is all property that is not classified as real property (Land and Buildings). I think of it like property that is actually used in the business by a person.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #677438
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks, I've never heard it being called that

    #677439
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    I struggled with REG compared to FAR.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #677440
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Quick question, if taking the exam on April 20, will the AICPA usually receive the exam data from prometric by midnight the same day, or is it possible that some of the exams on this day won't make it by midnight in order for a score release on May 5th?

    #677441
    Holly
    Participant

    I read on NASBA that for most people they'll get the scores within 24 hours. The only section they mentioned was BEC might take longer because of the written section.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

Viewing 15 replies - 226 through 240 (of 3,544 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 16’ is closed to new replies.