REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 146

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192517
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    “Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam

    Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 2,176 through 2,190 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #679401
    jstay
    Participant

    @cpa8488 see i am for a 100 and try to memorize all that i can, but recently ive been hanging out with my friends at night and thats the whole reason i feel like im gonna fail because if im not spending time studying i feel like im wasting it away. ahhh one week and it could potentially be all over. cant believe i got a 73 last time…

    #679402
    OR_CPA
    Member

    @canaanko, I am just pointing out that we added back the items to ordinary income for the S-Corp, thus retaining the character of the income items for the shareholder when passed through on the schedule K-1. The temporary tax difference for the depreciation would be reported on schedule K-1 – line 17.

    I am still trying to sort out all the different distribution rules around entities, and have seen a lot of verbiage stating an S-corp is treated similar to a partnership in regards to income recognition and pass-through items to its owner/shareholders.

    FAR - PASS
    AUD - PASS
    BEC - PASS
    REG - 11/24

    #679403
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    who's basis are you trying to figure out? a or b

    #679404
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    ok I computed basis of A and B not sure if I'm 100% correct but I know I'm close. I didn't get basis of 69,000 for either of them though. Here's what I did

    A

    basis 50

    FMV 70

    mtg 15

    CASH PAID 10 (6 for the liab. assumed + 4 in cash)

    Cash received 15 (for liab. given up)

    65-50-10+15= amt realized 20

    Amt. recognized = 5 (lesser of amt. realized or net boot)

    basis= 50-15+10+5=50

    #679405
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I don't know, either one i guess, I wasn't the one who asked, but I can't figure it out

    #679406
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    B

    basis 60

    FMV 65

    MTG. 6

    cash paid 15 (for liab. assumed)

    cash received 10 ( for liab. given up for 4 cash)

    70-60-15+10=5 amt realized

    0 amt. recognized (lesser of amt realized or net boot which is a negative 5,000 and can't recognize a loss)

    basis= 60+0-10+15=65

    #679407
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I got 55 for A

    50000 old + 6000 mortgage assumed + 4000 cash + 10000 gain = 70000 and minus 15000 mortgage given up

    edit: right, the gain is 5000, then 50000 is right

    #679408
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I am more confused with B. I agree with 70, but OP says the answer is 69

    I am also not sure if B has any gain at all. the boot received is -5000, right?

    #679409
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I got 70 for both basis. I don't know lol maybe someone else can add their input

    #679410
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    B's net boot ends up being 5. Because cash paid was 15 for the liab. assumed from A. Also, cash received from A was 6 for the mtg. and 4 in cash.

    #679411
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    no, A should have 50

    the way Roger explains it:

    DR new mortgage 15000

    DR new plug 50000

    CR old 50000

    CR new mortgage 6000

    CR cash 4000

    CR gain 5000

    #679412
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    B assumed 15000 mortgage and got 6000 debt relief + 4000 cash, it's 5000 negative, right?

    #679413
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    you right about A I just updated my post from earlier.

    #679414
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    yea the net boot would be -5000 however amt realized is 5. So it's the lesser of amt. realized or net boot. So it would be 0? because amt recognized can't be a negative number.

    #679415
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    This looks like a lot of steps, but take it slow and I think it should make sense. Also, maybe I am wrong…I guess I worked backwards since the question was posted with the answer of $69,000.

    The cancellation of debt is netted to determine A's gain. Thus, A has a gain of $9,000 (15,000 off the books – 6,000 assumption of B debt). A also pays cash of $4,000. Thus, the credits to A are: 50,000 basis of property off the books, 6,000 of B's debt onto the books, 4,000 of cash off the books, and 9,000 of gain recognized. Total credits are $69,000. Moving to the debit side…we know A got rid of $15,000 of debt, therefore, the last debit to get us to $69,000 is $54,000 of basis in new property for A.

    As for B, since he doesn't get to recognize a gain (he took on more debt than he gave up, that's a loss…never recognized for like kind exchange) the calculation is simpler. His credit side is $60,000 of basis off the books, plus $15,000 of A debt assumed. Credits total $75,000. This leaves the debit side with a $6,000 of debt off the books, and a new basis “plug” of $69,000 to get us to the $75,000 balancing entry.

Viewing 15 replies - 2,176 through 2,190 (of 3,544 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 146’ is closed to new replies.