REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 135

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192517
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    “Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam

    Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 2,011 through 2,025 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #679236
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can someone help me understand what the Uniform Capitalization Rules in Becker R1 is trying to say? I'm having trouble getting the big picture of what this is and Becker uses big paragraphs for this section that are hard to digest.

    #679237
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So when an s-corp makes a distribution is that separately stated item?

    Edit: its not. has nothing to do with it

    #679238
    jstay
    Participant

    omg so much info

    #679239
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Main thing about Uniform Capitalization Rules is to know what can be capitalized as inventory and what cannot. The biggest one is off-site storage and warehousing costs of inventory. Read it again with that in mind.

    #679240
    Sandia
    Member

    You must know the difference among: Negligence, Actual Fraud, Constructive Fraud or Gross Negligence. Yaeger explain very well that: read many time until you became familiar with πŸ™‚

    Accountants are liable for Negligence-must know 4 elements

    lements of Negligence

    Duty of Care The accountant owed a duty of due care to the party harmed

    Breach The accountant breached by failing to use due care

    Β· Failed to act like a reasonably prudent accountant

    Β· Usually means failed to follow GAAS or GAAP unless following

    GAAS or GAAP would make the report misleading

    Damages Some type of harm was suffered

    Casuality The damages were caused by the accountant’s breach

    Accountant is liable for fraud – either actual or constructive.

    a. Actual Fraud – must know 5 elements ELEMENTS OF FRAUD

    Must have Material Misrepresentation of fact

    Must have Scienter – intent to deceive (misrepresentation was made intentionally or

    knowingly)

    Must have Reasonable Reliance

    Must have Intent to rely

    Must have Damages – liable to anyone suffering a loss

    b. Constructive Fraud or Gross Negligence has all 5 elements of actual fraud but scienter is taken care of by a reckless disregard for the truth 5 ELEMENTS OF CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD –

    Must have Material Misrepresentation of fact

    Reckless disregard for the Truth (making a statement without knowing if it is true or

    false)

    Must have Reasonable Reliance

    Must have Intent to Rely

    Must have Damages – liable to anyone suffering a loss

    FAR - 77 x2 Wiley book & no test bank
    AUD - 83 x3 NINJA Test bank 3 time
    REG - 80 x1 NINJA Test bank
    BEC - 78 X2 NINJA Test bank ..done!!promesa cumplida mama -que llege al cielo πŸ™‚
    Ethic 100% Licensed VA CPA

    #679241
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Jstay how r the questions going? What's ur average?

    #679242
    No_one
    Member

    @Angelwatch and @Gabe and @ anyone else whoes name I am not familiar (sorry about that), Questions for you guys.

    First of all Congratulations πŸ™‚ you guys are done, I can't wait to have that feel good feeling :). I am using Becker can you please share your thoughts and strategies, how you did your revision and anything special, to deal with REG? I have zero tax practical exposure and thought of that is kind of killing me right now! I also want to join the club where I can say I am officially done. This is my last section and It's giving me cold sweats during nights.

    Please Please Please share your thoughts/ strategies.

    Thanks a lot! Have a big party.

    CA Candidate
    FAR: You are down...
    Aud: Surprised me...Thanks
    BEC: 75% work done
    REG: It's 80 but I am 100% done πŸ™‚

    #679243
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I used Becker as well.

    My strategy was to start with R5 and go thru R8 first. Those are the Ethics and Business Law sections and account for 40% of the exam. Some of the subjects aren't fun (I still hate Commercial Paper) and they make Contract MCQ as confusing as possible. But it's 100% conceptual. One you understand it, you're good to go. After finishing R5 – R8 I moved on to R1 – R4. The tax chapters. This is where you're going to spend the majority of your study time.

    For Becker I watched all of the Lectures, did all the MCQ and about 90% of the Sims. As Jeff himself said way earlier in this thread, if I was going to study for REG again, I wouldn't waste a single minute practicing Business Law sims. Once I finished that, I did a combination of NINJA MCQ and Becker MCQ. NINJA is really good to pull from all sources so you get a better idea of how much you actually know. You're going to start memorizing answers at some point so it's best, even on those memorized answers, to stop at each question and go through why it's the correct answer “I remember the answer is B but the reason it's B is because…” Becker was really good for targeted studying (I need to study this topic hard today so I load up Becker) but NINJA is better for an overall review.

    As far as the Sims go, I'm not really sure what to tell you. I recommend practicing some to get a feel of what they could ask you but you're not going to be ready for them on exam day. It sucks to hear that but it's true. So you're better off understanding the tax concepts really well so you can work the Sims from there. For what it's worth, every single one of my Sims was on a subject I knew about and had studied. They were just a lot more complicated and confusing than I was expecting. Biggest piece of advice: Learn the IRC and where to find specific information. It's confusing at first but after you play around with it for awhile, you'll learn who it's structured and be able to flip through it pretty fast to find specific information. And Becker's IRC in the Sims is almost a mirror image of the actual IRC on the exam (Becker just doesn't include everything).

    #679244
    No_one
    Member

    @Angelwatch Thanks a lot! I am really gonna target the Tax part and will not forget to include IRC in my studies/ practice. I really appreciate the way you explained and took time to cover everything in this regard. Congrats one more time. Enjoy your life, it's done.

    Asset of Q2 REG group. Have seen your contribution so far. Big Thank you!

    CA Candidate
    FAR: You are down...
    Aud: Surprised me...Thanks
    BEC: 75% work done
    REG: It's 80 but I am 100% done πŸ™‚

    #679245
    No_one
    Member

    Just one more question, How to target those dollar amounts and cutoffs/limits when it comes to tax? Do we have to memorize them?

    CA Candidate
    FAR: You are down...
    Aud: Surprised me...Thanks
    BEC: 75% work done
    REG: It's 80 but I am 100% done πŸ™‚

    #679246
    jstay
    Participant

    @cpa8488, im trending 85 and average 78. on my 72 question becker progress tests i usually get in the 80s. I have about 100 ninja that i have not answered yet

    #679247
    jstay
    Participant

    @no_one idk how important they are but im knowing the main ones (mom & pop, 1244, IRA, etc)

    #679248
    No_one
    Member

    @Jstay Thanks! when you are sitting for the test? Are you using Becker too?

    CA Candidate
    FAR: You are down...
    Aud: Surprised me...Thanks
    BEC: 75% work done
    REG: It's 80 but I am 100% done πŸ™‚

    #679249
    jstay
    Participant

    yes i am and im sitting on 5/15. 9 days…

    #679250
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @no_one how is studying going? when are you taking REG?

    to answer on jstay's behalf hes taking the exam on 5/15 and he did becker like 100x over lol going to ruin the curve for us all :/ jk

Viewing 15 replies - 2,011 through 2,025 (of 3,544 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 135’ is closed to new replies.