REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 132

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192517
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    “Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam

    Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #679191
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Just so you know your not alone. For example, I had a contact fitting appt. today right by my house. How long would you think it would take? 15 minutes probably I'm just trying on a new brand…. nope an hour and a half!! Want to know what else? construction on the way there so add another 10-15 to the commute. Then one of my girlfriends is going through problems and was talking to me on the phone for about an hour. And a few other things kept coming up…. So I originally had planned to start studying around 10am and now its 2pm and I'm about to start. SHIT happens I mean LIFE happens lol

    #679192
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    omg jstay seriously don't remind meeeee!!! I'm freaking out lol I want to up my mcq amount because I don't feel confident about C corps and want to do those questions over again! I think 107 a day might be to low.

    #679193
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ugh I hate life! Life is the worst, always in the way of everything

    #679194
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Confused by this: “While the purpose of the Act is not to allow for the detection of management fraud, it does have antifraud provisions.”

    Under the Securities Act of 1933, which of the following statements is (are) correct regarding the purpose of registration?

    The purpose of registration is to allow for the detection of management fraud and prevent a public offering of securities when management fraud is suspected.

    The purpose of registration is to adequately and accurately disclose financial and other information upon which investors may determine the merits of securities.

    A. I only

    B. II only

    Incorrect C. Both I and II

    D. Neither I nor II

    You answered C. The correct answer is B.

    The purpose of the Securities Act of 1933 is to protect the unsophisticated investing public by requiring registration of securities prior to issuance. Registration involves full disclosure of financial information.

    While the purpose of the Act is not to allow for the detection of management fraud, it does have antifraud provisions. Fraudulent securities transactions are prohibited even if the securities are not required to be registered (they are exempt from registration). The Act provides consequences for any untrue statement of a material fact or omission of a material fact involving the sale of securities in interstate commerce or through the mail.

    #679195

    B.law is not 20%. It is 40% of the exam.

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #679196
    jstay
    Participant

    @anjanja im pretty sure the SEC won't check for fraud or anything, they just make sure that the registration statement is complete and everything is included to let the investor make an informed decision

    #679197
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    cpa8488, lol what are you talking about I am no longer cleaning or cooking, you gotta prioritize, right?

    My son has mild autism, I must play with him as much as I can so that he wasn't playing alone and watching car wheels turning all day long. I turn a TV on for him and it makes me so guilty. LIFE!

    #679198
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    willpassby2014, great

    #679199
    Sandia
    Member

    2 things Act 33 and Act 34

    Act 33 –

    1. ’33 requires a registration statement filed with the SEC containing audited financial statements prepared by accountants for public sales of securities in interstate commerce

    2. Civil Liability –suits for money damages under Section 11 of ’33 – must show

    a. Acquired the stock – need not be the initial purchaser

    b. Suffered a loss

    c. Material Misrepresentation or omission of fact in the financial statement

    d. NO SCIENTER or RECKLESS disregard for the truth or RELIANCE need to be proven by thepurchaser.

    e. Accountant is liable unless he can prove it was not his fault (due diligence defense)

    f. Plaintiff must sue within 1 year of discovery of the misrepresentation and within 3 years of the offering date

    3. Criminal liability if accountant willfully made misrepresentation

    Act 34 11b and 10b-5

    1. ’34 generally covers stock sold on national stock exchanges in interstate commerce and requires reports and financial statements prepared by public accountants.

    2. Civil Liability for money damages under Section 10 b & Rule 10 b-5 – must show

    a. Purchaser or seller of stock

    b. Suffered a loss

    c. Material Misrepresentation or omission of fact in the accountant’s report

    d. Must also show SCIENTER (or a reckless disregard for the truth) – an intent to deceive or

    bad faith – negligence

    FAR - 77 x2 Wiley book & no test bank
    AUD - 83 x3 NINJA Test bank 3 time
    REG - 80 x1 NINJA Test bank
    BEC - 78 X2 NINJA Test bank ..done!!promesa cumplida mama -que llege al cielo 🙂
    Ethic 100% Licensed VA CPA

    #679200
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks Sandia

    #679201
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can someone explain the written policy to expense and applicable financial statement rules/limits?

    #679202
    jstay
    Participant

    @cpa8488 i have no idea what your talking about do you mean intangibles and organizational expenses under tax vs financial?

    #679203
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    its from R4. I had like 2-3 questions on it. I'm looking through the chapter now…. I think it's in the appendix at the end of R4. No I'm not talking about org. exp. 5,000 thing.

    #679204
    jstay
    Participant

    OHHH the de minimis rule? Yeah if they have an applicable financial statement they can deduct up to 5,000 per item (or the cost if its less)

    if they dont have an applicable F/S i believe it is 500 (total or per item, you'll have to check)

    its in the appendix

    #679205
    jstay
    Participant

    so basically if we have bought 15 chairs for for 45,000 and HAD an applicable F/S we can deduct the full 5,000 because each item is only 3,000 (note: this only applies to goods 5,000 or less and/or have an economic useful life of less then 12 months)

    applying my note: if the chairs we 90,000 we would not be able to deduct them and must capitalize them because they are over 5,000 and economic life is longer then 12 months

    now: lets assume we DONT have an applicable FS: – if we bought 5 chairs for 1,500 we can still deduct the full 1,500 because each chair is only 300 – less then the 500.

    If we paid 3,000 for 5 chairs we would not be able to deduct anything because they cost 600.

    hopefully this helps, hopefully im right lol but check out pgs R4-85 & 85 t

Viewing 15 replies - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 3,544 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 132’ is closed to new replies.