REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 125

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192517
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    “Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam

    Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 1,861 through 1,875 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #679086
    jstay
    Participant

    we were talking about separately/non-separately stated income yesterday so heres on

    PDK, LLC, had three members with equal ownership percentages. PDK elected to be treated as a partnership. For the tax year ending December 31, Year 1, PDK had the following income and expense items:

    Revenues $120,000

    Interest income 6,000

    Gain on sale of securities 8,000

    Salaries 36,000

    Guaranteed payments 10,000

    Rent expense 21,000

    Depreciation expense 18,000

    Charitable contributions 3,000

    What would PDK report as nonseparately stated income for Year 1 tax purposes?

    A.

    $30,000

    B.

    $35,000

    C.

    $43,000

    D.

    $51,000

    #679087
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    when would it be 0? I'm not sure why I automatically assumed 0. Yea, jstay I remember something in Becker talking about C corps liquidating and it being assumed sold to an outsider so its FMV not basis.

    #679088
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    B?

    #679089
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It would be 0 for partnership

    #679090
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    b 35000

    revenue 120

    rent (21)

    dep (18)

    guar. pymt. (10)

    salaries (36)

    non separately =35

    #679091
    jstay
    Participant

    yep anjanja and cpa8488 are correct

    ummm, maybe you were thinking 0 right away because thats the rule for partnerships. if a partner has a basis of 100,000 and the partnership distributes 50,000 cash & land with basis of 75 and fmv of 100,000…no gain would be recognized. his basis is brought down to 50 cause of the cash then his basis in land would be 50 but not gain

    same scenario but instead the partnership distributes 105,000 in cash and basis is still 100,000..gain of 5,000. even if they distribute land with it the only gain is 5,000

    same scenario accept is a C corporation. basis is 100,00 distribute 50,00 cash so now basis is 50,000. they distribute land with basis to corp for of 50,000 and fmv of 75,000. gain recognized to shareholder of 25,000. i believe gain is also recognized to corp for 25,000

    hopefully this is all correct

    #679092
    jstay
    Participant

    heres a question related to this topic that i just got lol

    When comparing liquidating distributions of different entities, which of the following statements is incorrect?

    A.

    If a partner receives cash in excess of the partner's adjusted basis, then gain is recognized on the excess.

    B.

    A C corporation will recognize a gain or loss when the corporation is liquidated.

    C.

    An S corporation will not recognize a gain or loss when the corporation is liquidated.

    D.

    In a partnership, if no cash equivalents are distributed, no gain is recognized.

    #679093
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    C? But I suddenly went blank on everything

    #679094
    jstay
    Participant

    you are correct! yeah, @sandia said it up a little, S corps and C corps are treated the same for liquidated distributions

    #679095
    Sandia
    Member

    Now that I took my test I remember everything… LOL

    The idea is remember the test day not after or before.. GOOD LUCK !!!

    FAR - 77 x2 Wiley book & no test bank
    AUD - 83 x3 NINJA Test bank 3 time
    REG - 80 x1 NINJA Test bank
    BEC - 78 X2 NINJA Test bank ..done!!promesa cumplida mama -que llege al cielo 🙂
    Ethic 100% Licensed VA CPA

    #679096
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I should start eating before the workout, this amnesia is even scary

    #679097
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    thanks jstay that did make sense!…. all these rules it's hard to keep it all straight!

    #679098
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    does it matter if the C corp is distributing to a SOLE shareholder or a group of shareholders?

    #679099
    Ai
    Member

    I got 3 questions related to this topic wrong whilst doing MCQs earlier, I thought it would be useful to share if anyone else may come across these.

    Releases of Cosurety:

    A release of a co-surety without the consent of the other co- sureties means that remaining surety is discharged to the extent that the surety could have recovered from the released surety.

    I keep thinking that the remaining surety gets released COMPLETELY!

    AUD (x3)81 (expires SEPT 2015)
    BEC (x2) 81 (Lost Credit in March), Retake- 79
    REG (x5) 76
    FAR (x1) 62 Retake August 2015

    #679100
    jstay
    Participant

    @cpa8488, i dont think it does

Viewing 15 replies - 1,861 through 1,875 (of 3,544 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 125’ is closed to new replies.