REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 111

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192517
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.

    “Death and Taxes” – Individual Tax for the CPA Exam

    Posted by Another71 on Monday, November 24, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #678874
    Tncincy
    Participant

    I think it read 12,000 land, 21,000 20% and 5,000 mortgage. So then deduct the mortgage amount then add back his portion for partnership %…….I think I get it. I know it's simple, I guess I need some more coffee

    It begins with a 75
    Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to pass

    #678875
    Jostrowski
    Member

    @jstay I take the exam this Tuesday. I've already gone through all of the material twice including the sims. I just got worried when I heard Becker's sims for REG aren't too helpful for the actual exam. I also am awful at finding things in the AL. Any tips on how to find what I'm looking for in the AL in the most efficient way?

    AUD: 62 [2/27/15], 87 [5/29/15]
    REG: 76 [5/1/15]
    BEC: 86 [7/20/15]
    FAR: 76 [8/28/15]

    DONE!

    Becker self-study, Illinois candidate

    #678876
    hunter32
    Member

    Boy, that was a weird experience. First testlet was very manageable. Second and third were a different story. Lots of questions where two choices were very obviously wrong and the other two very very close. SIMS were pretty tough, couple that I probably could've done a little better on and one completely out of left field. Time for the agonizing wait…

    BEC - 80 (Becker)
    AUD - 92 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
    FAR - 87 (Becker+NINJA MCQ)
    REG - 90 (Becker+NINJA MCQ and Audio)

    #678877
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hunter, I envy you, you'll be free soon

    #678878
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I don't get this, how is matching not a fringe benefit?

    Tapper Corp., an accrual-basis, calendar-year corporation, was organized on January 2, 2014. During 2014, revenue was exclusively from sales proceeds and interest income. The following information pertains to Tapper:

    Taxable income before charitable contributions for the year ended December 31, 2014

    $500,000

    Tapper’s matching contribution to employee-designated qualified universities made during 2014

    10,000

    Board of directors’ authorized contribution to a qualified charity (authorized December 1, 2014; made February 1, 2015)

    30,000

    What is the maximum allowable deduction that Tapper may take as a charitable contribution on its tax return for the year ended December 31, 2014?

    A. $10,000

    B. $40,000

    Answer (B) is correct.

    The total amount of charitable contributions is limited to 10% of a corporation’s adjusted taxable income. Tapper is limited to a $50,000 ($500,000 × 10%) deduction. Contributions to qualifying charities are deductible in the year paid. In addition, an accrual-method corporation may deduct a contribution authorized by the board of directors during the current tax year and paid no later than 2 1/2 months after the close of the tax year. Tapper has qualifying contributions totaling $40,000, which is under the 10% limit of $50,000, so Tapper may fully deduct its qualifying contributions in 2014.

    C. $30,000

    D. $0

    #678879
    Gabe
    Participant

    All the employees donated to a university and Tapper matched these contributions as a chartiable cause. Thus, not a fringe benefit. It's like when you give $10 to Breast Cancer Awareness and your company says they'll “match” your contribution. It's charitable, not fringe. Hope this helps

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #678880
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can someone explain what investment interest expense and net investment income is and how they relate?

    #678881
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Gabe,

    how is that you posts appear with delay?

    It doesn't say that those were charitable contributions, I figured it was some kind of education benefit for employees.

    #678882
    Gabe
    Participant

    @anj I am not sure. For the past few weeks, only in this thread, my posts are delayed. Maybe it's just a poorly worded question? I always assumed they were contributions…never fringe benefits. Anyone else chime in?

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #678883

    Is charitable contribution not allowed as a deduction for tax purpose – S Corp? i am getting anwer as 205,000 which is not here.

    In 2014, O'Day, an S corporation, had net income per books of $200,000 after deducting $100,000 for compensation to officers. O'Day also had a $10,000 capital loss and a $10,000 charitable contribution on its books for 2014. Depreciation per books was $20,000. MACRS depreciation is used for tax purposes and was $25,000. What is O'Day's ordinary income for tax purposes for 2014?

    A.

    $305,000

    B.

    $325,000

    C.

    $225,000

    D.

    $215,000

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #678884
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    is it D? no contributions, separately stated item, claimed on 1040

    #678885

    yes. It is D. Damn…i thought CC is allowed…too much information to remember..getting confused and scared.

    BEC Passed
    FAR Passed
    AUD Passed
    REG Passed

    #678886
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    me too

    #678887
    jstay
    Participant

    i went with D but the compensation to officers threw me off

    #678888
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Don't remember reading about this concept in roger's book

    fyi

    All of the following items are separately reportable items for electing large partnerships except

    A. Tax-exempt interest.

    B. Net capital gain or loss.

    C. Sec. 1231 gains and losses.

    Answer (C) is correct.

    For tax years beginning after December 31, 2000, to simplify reporting of partnership income, the new provision reduces the number of items that must be separately reported to partners by an electing large partnership. The taxable income of an electing large partnership considers Sec. 1231 gains and losses. Net Sec. 1231 gain is considered long-term capital gain, while net Sec. 1231 loss is considered ordinary and is consolidated with other partnership ordinary income.

    D. Taxable income or loss from passive loss limitation activities.

Viewing 15 replies - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 3,544 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 111’ is closed to new replies.