- This topic has 1,064 replies, 115 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 9 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 2, 2015 at 3:09 am #198722
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 4, 2016 at 5:22 am #748551
pracapParticipant@ bin,
For the below mentioned question, Answer from Ninja is different from Becker, which one is correct????
CPA 2015.0 – REG
Earnings and Profits, Question # 1332
Kent Corp. is a calendar-year, accrual-basis, C corporation. In 2015, Kent made a nonliquidating distribution
of property with an adjusted basis of $150,000 and a fair market value of $200,000 to Reed, its sole
shareholder. The following information pertains to Kent:Reed's basis in Kent stock at January 1, 2015 $500,000
Accumulated earnings and profits at
January 1, 2015 125,000
Current earnings and profits for 2015 including the effects of this distribution 60,000What was taxable as dividend income to Reed for 2015?
A. $60,000
B. $150,000
C. $185,000 – Correct as per Ninja Mcqs
D. $200,000 – Correct as per BeckersC is correct – When a corporation makes a nonliquidating distribution of property to a sole shareholder, it is considered a dividend.
Accumulated earnings and profits at January 1, 2015 $125,000
plus the current earnings and profits 60,000
——–
Total earnings and profits and maximum taxable dividend $185,000
========
The taxable dividend income to Reed for 2015 is $185,000, which is 100% of the earnings and profits of the
corporation.However, as per beckers, answer is $200,000/- and below is the explanation.
D is correct. A dividend paid in property other than money is taxable to an individual taxpayer to the extent of the property’s FMV, but not in excess of current and Accumulated E&P of the distributing corporation. In this case, the FMV of the dividend is $200,000. It is taxable to the extent the kent had current earning ($60000) plus accumulated E&P ($125000) plus any gain generated on distribution itself ($50000), thus the dividend is taxable to the extent of $200,000/-
February 4, 2016 at 5:28 am #748552
Future NinjaParticipantAnybody here who is gracious to share his summary of priorities when it comes to security attachment? please…
AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
BEC - 85
REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,February 4, 2016 at 6:31 am #748553
Future NinjaParticipantanyone???
AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
BEC - 85
REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,February 4, 2016 at 3:32 pm #748554
Mole351Participantquestion for appreciable property charitable donations:
I know if something is LTCG property and related to the function it is FMV with 30% AGI restriction, and STCG property and not related it's basis with 50% restriction.
How about LTCG not related? Does that fall into the basis/50% category? in other words, does the FMV/30% need to be BOTH LTCG and related?
FAR - 87 (5/15)
AUD - 93 (8/15)
REG - 86 (2/16)
BEC - 87 (5/16)February 4, 2016 at 7:00 pm #748555
Future NinjaParticipantAnybody here who is gracious to share his summary of priorities when it comes to security attachment? please..
AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
BEC - 85
REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,February 4, 2016 at 7:19 pm #748556
nibParticipantprCAP
I guess , 185000 correct answer .
1) non liquidating distribution by corporation to sole shareholder is at fmv= 200000.
So there is gain = 200000-150000=50000 , which is recognized by kent corp2)mcq Said
, “Current earnings and profits for 2015 INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF THIS DISTRIBUTION: $60,000”
this means there is no additional gain of $50,000 to be recognized by the corporation.
3) so now corporation had 60000 current earning and profit + 125000 accumulated earning and profit = 185000
so out of 200000 , 185000 from EARNING AND PROFIT = Dividend income .4) 200000-185000= 15000 is reduction in reed's basis .
reed's basis= 500000-15000= 4850005) check the wording in both backer and ninja about “INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF THIS DISTRIBUTION: ”
February 4, 2016 at 7:24 pm #748557
patelhj1ParticipantFebruary 4, 2016 at 7:26 pm #748558
nibParticipant@ patelhj1
pls guide us how u succeed.
February 4, 2016 at 7:27 pm #748559
nibParticipant@ futurninja
not clear what exactly you want .explain in detail
February 4, 2016 at 7:39 pm #748560
AnonymousInactiveFebruary 4, 2016 at 7:40 pm #748561
Future NinjaParticipantFebruary 4, 2016 at 7:40 pm #748562
Future NinjaParticipant@patelhj1 – congratulations!
AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
BEC - 85
REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,February 4, 2016 at 10:18 pm #748563
fruitsyrupMember@bin thank you! I have a general question as I am doing my final review 2 weeks before my exam. Do you guys have certain questions that you just can't seem to understand no matter how many times you see it? Is it necessary to understand every single Ninja question?
FAR - 71, 78
AUD - 71, 72, 78
BEC - 75
REG - 48, 60, 67, 76February 5, 2016 at 5:49 am #748564
patelhj1Participant@Future Ninja – Thank you so much.
@bin -posted this elsewhere but i copy and paste it here
@fruitsyrup – See how I do my review below
So keeping it short and to the point. I used Becker as my primary and supplemented with Ninja MCQ. I go through all the material in Becker once following the course schedule. After that I reread the and take notes and redo all the HWK and SIMS. After that I start Ninja MCQ and the Nina SIMS. I focus on section I'm doing bad in Ninja MCQ and relook at them in Becker
I would do Ninja MCQ – 20 sets and and do about and jump back and forth between SIMS. Learning to use the AL helps and will help you with most of the SIM questions they ask. I looked up all my SIM question in the AL before answering them.
Hope this helps. Good luck and stay STRONG and NINJA!!!!
BEC 78 08/2015
REG 71 11/2015, RETAKE 83 01/2016
FAR 75! 5/2016
AUD ? 8/2016Becker with Nonstop NINJA MCQ
Google most difficult professional examFebruary 5, 2016 at 1:44 pm #748565
Mole351ParticipantDoes someone filing married/jointly as widow/widower get a deduction/exemption for the deceased spouse in the 2 years after death?
FAR - 87 (5/15)
AUD - 93 (8/15)
REG - 86 (2/16)
BEC - 87 (5/16) -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 49’ is closed to new replies.
