REG Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 49

Viewing 15 replies - 721 through 735 (of 1,064 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #748551
    pracap
    Participant

    @ bin,

    For the below mentioned question, Answer from Ninja is different from Becker, which one is correct????

    CPA 2015.0 – REG
    Earnings and Profits, Question # 1332
    Kent Corp. is a calendar-year, accrual-basis, C corporation. In 2015, Kent made a nonliquidating distribution
    of property with an adjusted basis of $150,000 and a fair market value of $200,000 to Reed, its sole
    shareholder. The following information pertains to Kent:

    Reed's basis in Kent stock at January 1, 2015 $500,000
    Accumulated earnings and profits at
    January 1, 2015 125,000
    Current earnings and profits for 2015 including the effects of this distribution 60,000

    What was taxable as dividend income to Reed for 2015?

    A. $60,000
    B. $150,000
    C. $185,000 – Correct as per Ninja Mcqs
    D. $200,000 – Correct as per Beckers

    C is correct – When a corporation makes a nonliquidating distribution of property to a sole shareholder, it is considered a dividend.

    Accumulated earnings and profits at January 1, 2015 $125,000
    plus the current earnings and profits 60,000
    ——–
    Total earnings and profits and maximum taxable dividend $185,000
    ========
    The taxable dividend income to Reed for 2015 is $185,000, which is 100% of the earnings and profits of the
    corporation.

    However, as per beckers, answer is $200,000/- and below is the explanation.

    D is correct. A dividend paid in property other than money is taxable to an individual taxpayer to the extent of the property’s FMV, but not in excess of current and Accumulated E&P of the distributing corporation. In this case, the FMV of the dividend is $200,000. It is taxable to the extent the kent had current earning ($60000) plus accumulated E&P ($125000) plus any gain generated on distribution itself ($50000), thus the dividend is taxable to the extent of $200,000/-

    #748552
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    Anybody here who is gracious to share his summary of priorities when it comes to security attachment? please…

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #748553
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    anyone???

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #748554
    Mole351
    Participant

    question for appreciable property charitable donations:

    I know if something is LTCG property and related to the function it is FMV with 30% AGI restriction, and STCG property and not related it's basis with 50% restriction.

    How about LTCG not related? Does that fall into the basis/50% category? in other words, does the FMV/30% need to be BOTH LTCG and related?

    FAR - 87 (5/15)
    AUD - 93 (8/15)
    REG - 86 (2/16)
    BEC - 87 (5/16)

    #748555
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    Anybody here who is gracious to share his summary of priorities when it comes to security attachment? please..

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #748556
    nib
    Participant

    prCAP

    I guess , 185000 correct answer .

    1) non liquidating distribution by corporation to sole shareholder is at fmv= 200000.
    So there is gain = 200000-150000=50000 , which is recognized by kent corp

    2)mcq Said
    , “Current earnings and profits for 2015 INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF THIS DISTRIBUTION: $60,000”
    this means there is no additional gain of $50,000 to be recognized by the corporation.
    3) so now corporation had 60000 current earning and profit + 125000 accumulated earning and profit = 185000
    so out of 200000 , 185000 from EARNING AND PROFIT = Dividend income .

    4) 200000-185000= 15000 is reduction in reed's basis .
    reed's basis= 500000-15000= 485000

    5) check the wording in both backer and ninja about “INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF THIS DISTRIBUTION: ”

    #748557
    patelhj1
    Participant

    Thank you REG study group! You have helped and been amazing! Moving on to FAR

    Stay committed and you will overcome this obstacle!

    BEC 78 08/2015
    REG 71 11/2015, RETAKE 83 01/2016
    FAR 75! 5/2016
    AUD ? 8/2016

    Becker with Nonstop NINJA MCQ
    Google most difficult professional exam

    #748558
    nib
    Participant

    @ patelhj1

    pls guide us how u succeed.

    #748559
    nib
    Participant

    @ futurninja

    not clear what exactly you want .explain in detail

    #748560
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can anyone walk me through how to compute the partnership interest at risk basis with the example .or can suggest me how to practice question , In wiley book I don't see any of such question.

    #748561
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @bin – kindly share if you have summarized notes for PRIORITIES OF SECURITY ATTACHMENT. Thank you.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #748562
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @patelhj1 – congratulations!

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #748563
    fruitsyrup
    Member

    @bin thank you! I have a general question as I am doing my final review 2 weeks before my exam. Do you guys have certain questions that you just can't seem to understand no matter how many times you see it? Is it necessary to understand every single Ninja question?

    FAR - 71, 78
    AUD - 71, 72, 78
    BEC - 75
    REG - 48, 60, 67, 76

    #748564
    patelhj1
    Participant

    @Future Ninja – Thank you so much.

    @bin -posted this elsewhere but i copy and paste it here

    @fruitsyrup – See how I do my review below

    So keeping it short and to the point. I used Becker as my primary and supplemented with Ninja MCQ. I go through all the material in Becker once following the course schedule. After that I reread the and take notes and redo all the HWK and SIMS. After that I start Ninja MCQ and the Nina SIMS. I focus on section I'm doing bad in Ninja MCQ and relook at them in Becker

    I would do Ninja MCQ – 20 sets and and do about and jump back and forth between SIMS. Learning to use the AL helps and will help you with most of the SIM questions they ask. I looked up all my SIM question in the AL before answering them.

    Hope this helps. Good luck and stay STRONG and NINJA!!!!

    BEC 78 08/2015
    REG 71 11/2015, RETAKE 83 01/2016
    FAR 75! 5/2016
    AUD ? 8/2016

    Becker with Nonstop NINJA MCQ
    Google most difficult professional exam

    #748565
    Mole351
    Participant

    Does someone filing married/jointly as widow/widower get a deduction/exemption for the deceased spouse in the 2 years after death?

    FAR - 87 (5/15)
    AUD - 93 (8/15)
    REG - 86 (2/16)
    BEC - 87 (5/16)

Viewing 15 replies - 721 through 735 (of 1,064 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 49’ is closed to new replies.