- This topic has 1,064 replies, 115 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 10 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 2, 2015 at 3:09 am #198722
-
AuthorReplies
-
January 26, 2016 at 7:17 pm #748416
nibParticipantJanuary 26, 2016 at 7:58 pm #748417
CPA2B_NJMember@ahugemistake and @bin – thanks for the feedback guys
FAR - 50, 78
BEC - 67, 72, 75
AUD - 72, 80
REG - 70, 85To God be the glory! Forever, amen!
NJ License
January 26, 2016 at 8:38 pm #748418
rosecpaParticipantAhugemistake, I don't understand the explanation to the mcq- if the agi is 140, it is reduced by 50% odd the amount over 100. 25000- (40000*.5)=5000. How did they get to allowing 15000?
January 26, 2016 at 9:34 pm #748419
AnonymousInactiveI am surprised to see this kind of MCQ in REG at NINJA-MCQ.
Was it really intended by Elliott LLC to include this question in their REG test bank or it was just by mistake?
I know this a no-big deal of a question. Just curious.The internal control questionnaire is ideally used:
A.
during substantive testing.Correct B.
in the preliminary assessment stage of audit planning.C.
after the completion of substantive testing.D.
after the audit time and expense budgets are prepared.Explanation:
The internal control questionnaire is ideally used in the preliminary assessment stage of audit planning.January 26, 2016 at 10:13 pm #748420
ahugemistakeParticipant@rose this question frustrated me so much because I kept seeing varying explanation of the rules. I don't know what I'm over looking here but the explanation given to question contradicts the code, see blow: from publication 925
Special $25,000 allowance. If you or your spouse actively participated in a passive rental real estate activity, the amount of the passive activity loss that is disallowed is decreased and you therefore can deduct up to $25,000 of loss from the activity from your nonpassive income. This special allowance is an exception to the general rule disallowing the passive activity loss. Similarly, you can offset credits from the activity against the tax on up to $25,000 of nonpassive income after taking into account any losses allowed under this exception.
If you are married, filing a separate return, and lived apart from your spouse for the entire tax year, your special allowance cannot be more than $12,500. If you lived with your spouse at any time during the year and are filing a separate return, you cannot use the special allowance to reduce your nonpassive income or tax on nonpassive income.
Example.
Kate, a single taxpayer, has $70,000 in wages, $15,000 income from a limited partnership, a $26,000 loss from rental real estate activities in which she actively participated, and is not subject to the modified adjusted gross income phaseout rule. She can use $15,000 of her $26,000 loss to offset her $15,000 passive income from the partnership. She actively participated in her rental real estate activities, so she can use the remaining $11,000 rental real estate loss to offset $11,000 of her nonpassive income (wages).
https://www.irs.gov/publications/p925/ar02.html#en_US_2014_publink1000104571
I don't have time to dive deeper, but I'm still a bit confused. Will look up more later, but let me know if this makes sense.
FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79January 26, 2016 at 10:14 pm #748421
ahugemistakeParticipantJanuary 27, 2016 at 4:24 am #748422
rosecpaParticipantCan anyone explain why you multiply SE income by .9235 before you figure out the amount that should be deductible FOR AGI? I understand that you are eliminating 7.65% of the income, but why? If you are still able to take a deduction for half the amount (15.3*.5= 7.65), then why are you eliminating it twice?
January 27, 2016 at 4:25 am #748423
rosecpaParticipantJanuary 27, 2016 at 4:32 am #748424
ahugemistakeParticipantI've learned that it's wise not flip flop on courses, certain courses will phrase things a certain way in which they teach or explain them. The CPA exam usually phrases questions in much more simpler terms from what I've seen. I just switched to Ninja after CPAExcel and usually do bad in the start and slowly get better. Don't panic, it won't make things easier.
FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79January 27, 2016 at 4:40 am #748425
rosecpaParticipantJanuary 27, 2016 at 4:46 am #748426
ahugemistakeParticipantJanuary 27, 2016 at 6:06 am #748427
ahugemistakeParticipanti found this really useful to understand non liquidating and liquidating distributions
FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79January 27, 2016 at 6:06 am #748428
ahugemistakeParticipanti found this really useful to understand non liquidating and liquidating distributions
FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79January 27, 2016 at 11:14 am #748429
AnonymousInactiveI don't understand the call of the question.
Please help. Can someone give a simpler explanation? Thanks.Which of the following statements would not apply to a written contract governed by the provisions of the U.C.C. Sales Article?
A.
The contract may involve the sale of personal property.B.
The obligations of a nonmerchant may be different from those of a merchant.C.
The obligations of the parties must be performed in good faith.D.
The contract must involve the sale of goods for a price of $500 or more.Correct answer: D
Explanation: A written contract governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) would involve personal property, its performance must be enshrouded in “good faith,†and merchants' and nonmerchants' obligations may be different. If the subject matter of the contract involves the sale of goods for a price of $500 or more, then the contract must be in writing. However, a sale of goods for less than $500 could be the subject of a written contract under the U.C.C.January 27, 2016 at 2:18 pm #748430
nibParticipant@amorD
For following sale of goods oral contract is sufficient .,
1) unique or special goods – oral contract is enforceable .
2) Between merchants, an oral contract is enforceable if one of the merchants sends a written confirmation to the other and receives no objection within 10 days after sending it. Both merchants are bound on the oral contract.
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 40’ is closed to new replies.
